--:-- Bankless Nation, it is the third week of Downtober. We are not getting uptober. It looks like October is not on the menu. It kind of was the same exact thing that happened last year. Happy one-year anniversary, Ryan, this week of 1010. That happened one year and five days ago. Wow. It's been a while. You said this was like last year, but like last year was a lot worse than this. I'd just like to say, I mean, we're not that down that much. Like last year was like the end of crypto's fourth cycle. It started with a hint of bullishness and then quickly rose to be very, very red. And so that is a repeat of last year. We're turning red. Last year, Bitcoin started at like 120,000 and then ended at like... 80 or 90,000 or something. Yeah. And we started this month or even last month in 60,000s and we're ending 80,000s last month. And so the direction of travel is quite different. Every month, we start out with the roll-ups saying the words Uptober Curses of the month, okay? And it's bound to be a downtober instead, or like a blood red tober. It's not just us, though. Everyone in crypto does that. In addition to downtober in the crypto markets, we also got a flush coming out of the AI sector of the traditional stock markets, both in the United States equities markets, but also the Korean stock market. The Korean stock market down 23%, blowing back into the NASDAQ and the S&P. The AI credit... Part of the AI infrastructure build out starting to show some cracks and maybe it's blowing back into Bitcoin, into crypto, or maybe not. Ryan has a take. I do have a take on that. I don't know if it's the best informed take, but I do have a take, David. Also, I have a take on the attack on the Ledger wallet supply chain. Somebody was implementing a spy sort of device inside of Ledger wallets, the hardware wallets you guys know. that would read your seed phrase during setup and beam it to some hackers that would then steal your funds. Over $100 million in funds stolen this way. How deep does this attack go? We're also going to talk about the Bank of America. Apparently, they had been ignoring some suspicious activity, a little bit of terrorism, a little bit of drug cartels. Money laundering. A little bit of crime. Yeah, $5 billion worth, and they were fined by FinCEN this week. CZ has some thoughts on that fine, actually, having been there before. What else we got? Richard Hart, we have not talked about that name in a very, very, very long time. Good riddance as well. Was arrested in Istanbul on an Interpol red notice. The law finally caught up to him. We're going to talk about the saga and how it all concludes. And I have a take about the hexagons that I want to share with you. with you as well when we get there. Can't wait. And then we're also, I'm going to talk to Ryan about paper trade. Yeah, what is this thing? What the heck is this thing? I know Ryan has been just dying to get his hands on a way to go 1,000x long in any particular direction. So we're going to talk about what it's been like in paper trade 10 days in or so, but Let's start in the crypto markets. Bitcoin is down 2.5% on the week to $82,500. I think we actually are recovering a little bit at the time of recording, at least some of the down market coins. But overall, down 2% on the week. I think there was a lot of bullishness as the Bitcoin price broke through the previous May highs of this year into Bitcoin. $85,000, $87,000. We are now below the May highs, and so people are now worried about, I don't think we're worried about setting a lower low, but I think people are worried about setting a higher low, but going down nonetheless. Like the whole Ben Cowan bearish until the midterms take seems to be coming back into focus, back into view. I thought he reversed on that, though. He did reverse on that, right? He didn't quite reverse on it. He said that he was wrong about getting new highs above the May highs, but he still held out room for the midterms could still be rough. I was just wrong about having a new high set in this year. Yeah, well, maybe this is part of a midterm sell-off, of course. So on PolyMarket, 64% chance the Democrats take the Senate right now, and 91% chance the Democrats take the House. So this could be a blue sweep coming in early November. And you can't imagine that the crypto assets want that. Like, over the last, like, month or so, we have to have seen, like, Bitcoin and other crypto assets just price in a Democrat win, right? Yeah, I wonder. But, I mean, like, why would that be so negative for crypto at this point? I could understand why a crypto disparaging president would be incredibly negative for crypto. But it's not like we have any laws in Congress, right? Clarity's dead. Sure. What does crypto have? Yeah. Yeah, I don't know that this would be so bearish for crypto. Yeah, I mean, traders could just be trading it, right? Like, I agree with you, the fundamental analysis. I don't think the Democrats are going to come in and be like, all right, let's rip everything about crypto out. I don't think they care that much. They're mostly indifferent to crypto at this point. They're focused on AI right now. Yeah, they're focused on AI. They're distracting everything. All of the flack, yeah. Yeah, it really has. Yeah. I was going to say, I think because part of the reason the vibe seems so down this week is not just because of Bitcoin. That's only actually off 2.5%. It's because the rest of the alt market has continued to sell off. We started seeing that in the beginning of October, and that has persisted. ETH down 7.5% on the week. But if you look at Sol, Zek, Hype, Near, another 10% down, and that's stacking on, what, the 10%, 15% down from last week? What's happening in the altcoin market right now? Yeah, I guess using Bitcoin as a barometer for the market isn't really that useful these days because Bitcoin has just been really slow. A lot of the activity has been down market in some of those coins that you've mentioned. In the last like two hours, so we are recording right now at 11.30 a.m. Eastern time on Thursday, in the last two hours, some tokens have, have had a rebound in strength. So VVV is up 10% on the day. NIR is actually back up above $5. So there's definitely been some strength in the market, not everywhere. PUMB and LIT are both down 20%. HYPE is down 10%. Zcash down 10%. And so, yeah, it continues to be a flush from some of the strongest assets in the market, but you're still seeing some strength. Do you remember what 2023 felt like? That was the early bull of last cycle. I want you to teleport your mind back there. It was early bull, but we still felt like shit. That's right. That's right. That was sort of the point Michael Nato made this week in the DeFi report. And he looked at this number, which is so in blue, you see the 50-week moving average for Bitcoin and the Bitcoin price in purple. And at the time of inflection, the same point at which we saw this time where things started to flip early bullish, we did stay above the 50-week moving average, which is about 78K Bitcoin. So if we stay above the 50-week moving average and the average will go down a little bit over time, that would still mean a Bitcoin over 75K. That said, though... There was about seven months of oscillation, of sideways action, of like we might call it BARTs on the charts, right? Where it held this very narrow range. We had two times 17% corrections on Bitcoin and just seven months of absolute chop, even though it was the early bull market in 2023. So that's kind of the way early bull markets feel. They feel sideways. It's like Schrodinger's market. Like, is it a bull market? Is it a bear market? You just don't know until hindsight. Yeah. So still my base case is that we have broken the back of the bear market, that we're not going back. For sure. We are not setting a lower low. We are not going down the low that we set a couple months ago. Exactly. But that doesn't mean like the good times are here and like it's all, you know, going to be sunshine and rainbows and easy from here on out. That's not what the early bull market actually has has been in the past. That's not what it feels like. So we're probably continuing to just maintain that trend. Yeah, yeah. There are some just idiosyncrasies. Like, this is a new cycle. We are in a new era of crypto. Everyone feels it. We're in, like, the product era. It is interesting to me that, like, one big story of this last flush or so of the last two weeks is, like, what are the tokens that have really spawned this boost in crypto morale that are up anywhere between, like, 4 and 10x from the bottom. Like VVV at $24 right now was $1.5 nine months ago. You know, Zcash was $50 12, 14 months ago. So some of these tokens are up bigly. Like Lit, for example, was $1. Now it's at $3, touched $5.5. Revenue generating assets, other than Zcash. Revenue generating assets are all up very, very big. Hype, the big one, has been up very, very big. It's all revenue generating. And those assets really changed the whole tide, the whole morale of the rest of the market. And two weeks ago, even last week, it really kind of did the euthanasia rollercoaster where people are like, oh, the bull market's on. Let me go take a leverage long position on a super illiquid dog shit coin. Like, I don't want to name examples because I just made it mean. But there were people buying the bottom of coins. Calling them quality alts. And let me tell you, they were not quality alts. So we just skipped into like the bull market froth way too soon. And that was like last week. And now I think we're just paying our debts from like people going from fundamentals to like rampant speculation just way too fast in crypto. And that's getting flushed out right now. I agree. And I also agree with the idea that our tokens seem much stronger this cycle than in previous cycles. And I think that could persist into this early bull phase and then into kind of wealth creation phases a little bit later. So that might be where the majority of crypto alpha has actually generated less Bitcoin dominance this time around. But let's talk about some of the other things in the waters in macro and financial markets. I think The big thing we should start with is inflation. It came in pretty hot this week, David. So September inflation came in at 3.7%. That is almost 4%. This is versus an expected 3.6%. It was 3.4% in August. And I mean, this, like when you start to get to 4% inflation, yeah. I mean, that does not feel normal at all. I think this is going to bite Republicans in the midterms as well. And where was the bulk of this inflation coming from? Energy, gas, air travel, which is gas, fuel. I don't know why fuel and gas are in different categories, but they are. It's all energy. It's all downstream of the Iran war and increased gas prices coming out of the Strait of Hormuz. Okay, so when you have hot inflation prints, then what happens is the probability that the Fed has to raise rates increases. And that's what we saw in prediction markets and probabilities go up that the Fed was going to continue to increase. We also saw the 10-year and the 30-year long duration U.S. bonds, they spiked back up. So they were starting to settle down a little bit. Now they spiked back up on the back of this because, of course, investors in bonds want higher yields in exchange for this increase. very hot, these very hot inflation numbers. It's just, I mean, GDP has been pretty high lately, you know, we're tracking five, between five and maybe 6%. And inflation has been hot too. So three to 4%. Just the nominal number here, like nominal growth here is like pretty large, right? So I guess real growth, we might be like one to 2% in real terms. But when we got 4% inflation, 5%, 6% GDP growth. Everything is running pretty hot on the money side of things. Also, the AI financing concerns popped up. There was CoreWeave, which I don't know if you saw this, David, but CoreWeave, which is kind of the NeoCloud story, it's data centers for AI, it fell 17% on Wednesday, okay? And the big scare was CoreWeave bonds, which now the 2032 bonds bought at par four months ago, so bought at 100, trade at 78 cents, okay? So this implies that CoreWeave might have a greater than 50% chance of default in the next five years. That's what bond investors are pricing this as. And so it's become a narrative again of like, okay, like how is the AI build out going and Are the revenues justifying the amount of CapEx spend? Where is that CapEx spend coming from? Because in 2025, it was all retained earnings from hyperscalers. It's just basically profits on their balance sheet, cash on their balance sheet. Now it's bonds. Here's a chart from the No Opinion Post I read this morning. Look at 2026. This is the amount of bonds issued by the hyperscalers that are flooding the market. So we're starting to see more and more debt, more and more leverage to fund the AI buildout, which means everyone is focused on kind of the revenue side. What is Anthropic? Is OpenAI? Are these these neoclouds? Are they generating enough revenue to justify the loans and the debt that these companies are taking on? And when there's little blips, like there was a blip this week on OpenAI revenue projections. This was in the last week or two. And also Anthropic. Anthropic, Benythropic. Both, right? Both, really? Yeah. OpenAI, it looks like it's coming in closer to 50 billion ARR rather than the 68, 70 billion that investors thought. Anthropic is looking a little softer as well. And again, still growing insanely quarter to quarter, but just not as fast. as it had been previously. So people are wondering if revenue is starting to approach that S-curve. And when that happens, then the entire AI trade starts to become suspect. I should say like NASDAQ is down one to 2% on this. So it hasn't hit, Stock indices in large measure is just hitting some specific sectors, but you're starting to hear this narrative once again that, okay, like debt funded. Is this like railroads again? Is this 1873 when just after a railroad boom, we ran out of debt, loans started going bad and it caused like, you know, a multi-year depression in the U.S.? Did it cause a multi-year depression? Yeah. Oh, nice. So it caused a multi-year depression. It looks like this. Noah actually has another chart in his story. It looks something like this. Let me see if I can find that. Here you go. This is the... Number of miles of railroads built in the U.S. And I think these bars are kind of like, you know, depression, recession type bars. Depression in the number of miles built, but not a broad economic contraction. Oh, no, it definitely did that, too. It definitely did that, too. See, this gray part, that is all kind of recession negative growth arrows of the chart. But here's the interesting thing about the railroads. There were multiple cycles of this, too. Yeah. So you see this. So after there was a flush, they just started happening again. There was a boom in the 1870s and then a bust. Okay. And then there was another bigger boom in the 1880s, followed by another bust. And then there was another bigger boom in like the late 1880s, followed by another bust. Wow, that's funny. Right? So you had multiple cycles of this with railroad infrastructure. All of this in the AI sector feels very expected. The efficient frontier of AI investment requires some amount of leverage, right? It's just like who of all the companies that have burned through their cash, before AI really turned into like an investment project, all the big companies, all the hyperscalers like Facebook, Amazon, all had, were sitting on piles of cash like Microsoft. Yeah, yeah. Burned through all that cash. But the race isn't over, and so you have to go into debt. Yep. And there is a correct amount of debt, a correct amount of risk. That's right. You can't have no debt because the race is still on. You can't have too much debt because you'll get wiped out. But there is a correct amount of debt. And whichever company plays this game correctly is going to be one of the winners. And so when we see people like CoreWeave kind of getting punished by the market or other companies getting punished by the market. This is what you would expect to happen when the market is so sensitive to Anthropic and OpenAI's revenue numbers. So we got Anthropic's revenue numbers this week, $16.8 billion of Q3 revenue, which is up 50, 5-0% quarter over quarter, which how can you be upset about that? You can if you're expecting like 100% or 120%. So there was 140% revenue growth quarter over quarter between Q1 and Q2. And then only 45% revenue growth in Q3, the 50% number it is quoted. And so it's actually slowing down. And so when people are on margin and the acceleration slows, the acceleration is decelerating. Then all of a sudden the people on the further end of the risk spectrum get in trouble the most. This is totally normal and expected. And markets climb a wall of worry. And I feel like this is just what this looks like. Yeah, and it is the case that you need 100%, 140%, some more numbers like that in order to justify the amount of capex that's being spent here. Of course, Korea was starting to price this in. So didn't you say that the COPSE was down almost like 20% or something like this? Yeah, 23%. And the COPSE is our NASDAQ or SPY. So imagine if the SPY was down 20%. The reason why it's like that is because memory stocks, just like chip productors for the AI build out, are such a large part of the Korean stock market. And so the Korean stock market is down a very big amount. When the Korean stock market is down that much, it blows back into the American stock markets. So there's a little bit of contagion happening here. You know, if the AI trade hadn't kind of unwound in the last week, would crypto prices be higher? Probably also true. They probably would be higher. It maybe is a little bit of that. Did crypto need to cool off? Yes. And the reason why we know this is true is because, as we said, Bitcoin was down like 1% or 2% on the week, but the big ones that have gone up multiples are up down 20% to 30%. It's like our equivalent of memory stocks went down. Yeah. And so like overall, I think there's a lot of reasons to talk about. We talked about inflation, the AI climbing a wall of worry, people worry about leverage, revenue growth stalling out, but also timing with just like, yo, crypto was running hot for a hot bit. Well, can I give you the backdrop on this and maybe a projection beyond where we are in 2026 into 2027? This was, I think this was kind of the required reading of the week. My favorite piece of the week was from Ray Dalio. He had wrote an article called Numbers Behind the Bond and Bear Market and Outlook to Equities, all of these things. And here was this major point. And I want to see if this resonates for you, David, because due to all of your crypto experience living through these cycles, okay, I'm going to see if this resonates for you. He said the big problem that he sees in the 2027 horizon, he, of course, talked about debt to GDP and interest payments, how that was going to hit in kind of like the fiscal dominance era that we're in. And he also talked about rollovers. So we're moving a lot of the long term bonds in the U.S., the long term debt. We're converting those to bills. We're converting them to three month, one year, shorter term treasuries, of course, we're trying to sell it. In 2027, there is going to be a lot more debt that needs to be sold to investors. You have much more supply and you have whatever demand is available to sop that up. So he says this, the way I would think about the 2027 challenge is that the supply of debt will likely rise from about $3.5 trillion in 2025 to about $4.4 trillion in 2027. And that doesn't include the debt rollovers, where we have to take the long-term debt, roll that over into short-term debt. Okay. So think of this as like, token issuance, token oversupply, and you have to have an extra $1 trillion in dollar token demand to sop that up. And if you don't have that, well, yields will have to continue to increase to compensate. So you have that happening in 2027. And that's just government debt. Then you have all of the AI debt looking for buyers. Again, token issuance, token debt, looking for demand of buyers, investors who want the exposure to that type of debt competing against this too. So a lot of issuance. And not only issuance in debt at all-time highs and growing at pretty exponential rates, we also have a lot more equity token issuance. All right, you get a SpaceX IPO. You get the anthropic IPO. Okay? Even Google, for the first time, I don't know, in decades, issued shares this year. Wow. Issued net new shares in order to fund some of their expenditures. So a lot of you equity issuance... Yeah, makes me want to buy some hard assets. Okay? Things that don't inflate in supply. And that was actually Dalio's conclusion here. Yeah. 2027, I see long-term yields continuing to ramp up. I see equities being kind of flat. It doesn't matter what price to earnings do and profits do. If we have all of this new issuance, there's not going to be enough demand to sop it up. So he again is back to, yeah, you better have gold, maybe a slice of Bitcoin and prepare for the debasement trade. I'm not sure if he's entirely right. I feel like directionally he's going to be right. I don't know if this all hits in 2027 or we get to extend this a little bit longer. But this piece is kind of required reading, in my opinion, for understanding the debasement trade and why hard assets and why crypto money's. I don't think anything Ray Dalio says will be able to be like confirmed right in a short time frame. He's just such a long term guy. It also kind of makes him just seem a little bit infalsifiable. But that's a topic for a different day. Exactly. Exactly. Exactly. That would be the main criticism of Dahlia, I think. He's like, over 80 years, I'll be right. I'm like, all right, dude. I need to make some trades this decade, please. Yeah. All right. Coming up next, we're going to talk about the Ledger, the Ledger exploit attack, a physical supply chain attack on real Ledger is bought from a real resaler, but with a spy chip in the Ledger. Over $100 million have been gone. And also Bank of America just ignores $5 billion of money laundering going through their bank. I thought banks weren't supposed to do that to terrorists and drug cartels. We're going to talk about all the bankers that went to jail as a result of all this. But first, we're going to talk to some of these fantastic sponsors that make this show possible. I've been trading crypto for almost a decade, and I've used so many different wallets, exchanges, aggregators, or front ends. And I'm basically always looking for the same thing, just one interface with a deep liquidity across a bunch of chains and assets, where I can access markets like perps, earn yield, trade confidentially, and still control all of my funds. And I've never really found it. And I'm just always switching wallets, juggling gas fees, or getting eaten by slippage. But near.com feels fundamentally different to me. I can do anything I want from any chain and keep all of my activity confidential. Crypto, tokenized assets, perps, payments. I can even earn yield confidentially. One account, over 30 chains, confidential by default. It's the way that crypto ought to work. And it's powered by near, which has moved over $30 billion cross-chain, uses post-quantum signatures, And that's run over five years on mainnet with zero downtime. Near.com is the best way to be on-chain and be in control. Get 20% of your trading fees back on near.com using the bankless link in the show notes, not investment advice. Dollar stable coins taught Latin America how to store value on-chain. RIPIO is taking that same idea and bringing it to the currencies people actually use every day. With wrapped fiat, RIPIO is putting more than a decade of experience powering crypto infrastructure for leading companies across Latin America behind a suite of six local currency stable coins covering Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Chile, and Peru. Each is pegged one-to-one to its local currency and fully backed by reserves held in regulated financial institutions with independent attestations published for each token. But wrapped fiat is not just designed to sit there, it's built to move. The suite is live across 10 EVM chains with liquidity and integrations already spanning platforms like Morpho, Uniswap, and Chainlink. Users can move between local payment rails like Pix and Spey and matching wrapped fiat one-to-one in real time with zero fees on both on-ramps and off-ramps and no FX conversion. Local rails in, on-chain in the middle. And for builders, Ripio offers APIs, webhooks, widgets, and a sandbox just from day one. Start building with wrapped fiat today at platform.rippio.com. So on October 9th, which is Friday of last week, Ledger began investigating wallet thefts that had been linked to ledgers sold by a Southeast Asian reseller, Cryptobilis, and ordered Cryptobilis to halt sales and shipments. Ledger later confirmed that a hardware implant had been found in at least one affected device. So some poor soul bought a ledger from an authorized reseller and then put their money in the ledger after setting up their ledger, and then their money was gone. Many poor souls, we should specify. Starts with one. Starts with one. The investigation starts with one. And then so Ledger opens up this ledger and be like, hey, there's this extra chip in here. We need to figure out what this chip does. And so what the chip did was it intercepted. You've set up a few ledgers in your lifetime, Ryan. I'm sure many of the listeners have. You go and you set up your ledger, and your ledger securely gives you 24 words. and that's securely produced on the device, and you plug it into the Ledger software on your computer, and the Ledger software says, this is a verified Ledger device. You can trust it. None of that was tampered with. The new chip intercepted, when the Ledger device gives you the 24 words, it just watches that go onto the screen, and then using a radio transmitter, it transmits that over data using an electronic SIM to the attackers. And so the Ledger device is un- It's tampered, but the software is not tampered with. As this investigation continued, as of Ledger's October 13th update, hundreds of reported exploited devices were found across different reports. Over an estimated $102 million stole from 324 wallets. Wallets, not individual victims, but you could imagine individual victims are in... maybe the 100 range. Yeah, so physical supply chain attack. We've seen these before, but not at this scale. This is by far the biggest physical supply chain attack in crypto. I mean, it was relatively sophisticated as well. This company, Crypto Billis, was not a recent reseller. They'd been a longtime reseller of Ledger products for Ledger somewhere in Asia, right? And they were purchased by a Chinese national company company of some kind. Now, this company seemed to be sort of shady. I believe they were purchased six months ago. The previous owners were under NDA, so they couldn't even, they felt like they couldn't disclose that they were purchased. And this new purchaser quite clearly was some sort of op that was installing a spy device in the ledgers in order to harvest those seed phrases and those And at the point right before they were discovered, actually launched the attack. So all of this hit because somebody cracked open a ledger and was like, huh, there's a spy device here. Post that on Twitter. And then it seemed like whoever's operating CryptoBillus then was like, oh, shit, our cover's blown. We better get out with the private keys we had and then just started draining the wallets with all the private keys they had. And that's where you get the hundred million number from all of that. Yeah. Do you see who posted that picture on Twitter? Yeah, this is Mark Karpelis, right? The Man of God's guy. Yeah. He's on his redemption arc. The Man of God's guy. Yeah, yeah. Wow. Scary attack, though, right? And this begs the question of how many other parts of the supply chain might be infiltrated. And Ledger is still trying to, like, I saw reports that possibly there were some resellers in Europe that had some tampered devices. I mean, you just don't know. There's quite an incentive to tamper if you're a reseller of these devices. Yeah. Yeah. Buying from a reseller, even though it's an authorized reseller, doesn't seem like a good idea. Definitely don't do an unauthorized one. Like, people were talking about reports that people bought, like, used ledgers. Like, give me a break. Don't do that. Buying from Ledger has also resulted in data exploits, which has also made self-custody hard. Self-custody has just taken L after L after L in the last two years. Oh, yeah. A bunch of punches to the gut. And not only that, I mean, this attack aside, we should just say the way to purchase a hardware wallet or the best way to purchase a hardware wallet is definitely from the company itself, not from a third-party reseller in any case. Yeah. Even from the company. Yeah. The company is dependent on the supply chain as well. Yeah, they're not producing the chips. They are servicing that out to a third-party producer. And there's never been an issue there so far. But again, these attacks keep getting more and more sophisticated, and they just find the points of vulnerability. Yeah. That's definitely a hit to self-custodial wallets. You could use multi-sigs, you can have multiple devices. There are ways around this, but it is a hit to self-custody usability. Speaking of which, David, not only are we taking hits from hackers and like pirates taking these funds, also governments can't. coming after self-custody. And I think this is going to happen more and more in countries that are having a problem servicing their debts, okay? France is one of those countries, relatively high debt to GDP, yields on French bonds going up. And if you've seen the high school protests in France, government looking for new ways to, to get money, new ways to get capital. And one of the things they want to prevent is any sort of backdoors, maybe, with crypto. There was an amendment in France put together by some MPs that was reported out that would require all self-custody wallets to be declared. So you have to declare whether you have a self-custody wallet. If it's over, at first it was 100K in euros, and now there's a revision to make it 5K in euros. So any self-custody wallet you have that has over 5K euros in it, you have to declare and report to the French government. And of course, we've seen hacks... on the French infrastructure, tax infrastructure, has actually revealed the holders and the locations and the addressers of these holders. So it's a massive physical security risk to all French citizens. Not only that, it's an inventory of digital property that the state maintains. And, you know, this is like... In other contexts, it's called a hit list. Right. I mean, it's like just like not a good direction of travel, certainly. But you could see this is a French government trying to seal off all of the doors for any form of capital flight. And, you know, suspicious that some of that capital flight could come in the form of crypto. So, yeah, another hit on self-custody. One of the quotes that resonated with me at token 2499, and I saw this was, I can't remember who was giving this presentation, but it was about Zcash. Assets that can be seen can be seized. And so, I mean, it's advocating for putting your Zcash in the shielded pool. But even if it's Bitcoin, for example... Like you would think Bitcoin is like very seizure resistant and mathematically that's true until quantum. But if the government knows and can link physical digital property to your identity, then they have means to go after you and your $5,000 of like digital assets that you keep in your back pocket. Well, so if you're the French government, you're trying to do that. How soon until you just ban any form of privacy? So you can't have a private self-custodial wallet or that's illegal, subject to fine, subject to jail time. I mean, that would be the logical direction of travel here, right? Sure. Yeah. I don't know if that would be bullish or bearish. it seems to be just a thing that is happening that markets and the world will have to contend with. Speaking of something else that's happening. Speaking of things that are happening. I saw that transition coming from so far away. Bank of America, David, the biggest fine in U.S. history from the OCC to a bank, 1.2, to an American bank, I should say, $1.2 billion, hitting Bank of America with a fine for $1.2 billion. The charge is that the bank failed to flag over $5 billion in suspicious transactions. Money laundering. Yeah. Chinese money laundering networks, illicit finance, drug cartels, terrorism, the gamut, $5 billion worth. And so this was a penalty that FinCEN OCC issued to the Bank of America for these crimes. CZ had an interesting take on this. No one went to prison, no home confinement, no DPAs, no one was charged. Water under the bridge, onwards. Very interesting that no bank manager, no banker was harmed, was sent to jail, was threatened by this. This was just a fine at the corporate level, unlike... when FinCEN is taking actions in crypto where people like CZ have actually gone to jail. So there's a little bit of hypocrisy there. Yeah, this reminds me of Bill Gurley's talk a couple years ago at the All In Summit where he was just talking about like, yeah, the reason why stuff this happens is because Certain sectors have a very close approximation to DC. Like the banks are in DC. You know who wasn't in DC when CZ got arrested and put in jail? Crypto. Crypto is not paying its protection money to the DC racket, but the banks have been paying protection money to the DC racket for years. And so that's why they are allowed to get away with this. And that's also why in a counter move, crypto has decided to move into DC. To pay protection money to the DC racket. Honestly, it makes one jaded. Just like looking at the whole process. That's what crypto had to do. And also it corrupts crypto in the process. Totally. The way it has corrupted banking. It's mutual corruption. Yeah. It's just like... in shitification of ER industries. And yeah, it's unfortunate. But AML KYC, I guess it doesn't work, David. Yeah, I'm sure it works when the state wants it to work. There was also simultaneously this week a report from the OCC on debanking. And Nick Carter was quick to claim this. We weren't imagining it. Operation Chokepoint 2.0, the thing he had talked about so much, was real. This report, he says, confirms it. So... It confirms that banks between 2020 and 2025, banks in the U.S., based on all the complaints they saw in the investigation that the OCC did, debanked individuals and businesses based on three things. Political risk, industry risk, religious risk, some combination of those. And that was enough criteria for a bank to debank someone. Nothing illegal. Just if you're in kind of a risky pool of actors as digital assets, as crypto was, you could be debanked. This was actual policy coming out of the OCC and this report kind of delineates it and puts a stop, formalizes it and also reiterates that they're putting a stop to it now. So that's no longer continuing. Yeah, it feels like we're tracing over what we already knew to be true. I mean, certainly we knew it to be true, but I guess this kind of just makes it common knowledge for everyone else. But also, everyone else doesn't care. The only people who still care about this are crypto people, right? I think anyone who's been debanked cares about it. I guess people who have never been on the other side of that don't care about it. Yeah, yeah. All right, coming up next, we're going to talk about Richard Hart, the creator of Hex. Just injustice, complete injustice to his arrest and seizure in Istanbul. We're going to talk about how we can free Richard Hart. And we're also going to talk about paper trade where you can get 100, excuse me, 1,000x leverage. But when you get liquidated, you get to be part of the house. We're going to talk about this and all of the shenanigans going on on paper trade. But first, we can talk to some of these fantastic sponsors that make the show possible. Bankless Nation, we've built something for you. Introducing the Bankless MCP. ChatGPT and Claude are great at a lot of things, but ask them anything beyond the basics of crypto about protocol mechanics, tokenomics, or just what happened last week in crypto, and the gaps will start to show. The problem is context. Bankless, on the other hand, has spent almost a decade building one of the deepest archives of crypto data anywhere. More than 2,000 podcast transcripts, 10,000 articles, and countless conversations with the people actually building this industry. And now we've structured all of that data into the Bankless MCP. So you can go and connect it to your Claude or ChatGPT, and suddenly your AI can answer your crypto queries with the entire Bankless archive behind it. And every new Bankless article or episode gets added automatically, so the context keeps staying up to date. The Bankless MCP is exclusively available to Bankless premium subscribers. So you can go to bankless.com, upgrade to premium, and connect the MCP in just a few minutes. And all of a sudden, your crypto queries to your AI, LLM, whatever you use, will get a thousand times better. So go check it out. There is a link in the show notes. And once you become a Bankless Premium member, you can hop into the Bankless Discord and let me know how you like it. Cheers. Each one, we get into his portfolio, what he's holding, the market structure, entry targets, fair market value of Bitcoin and Ether, and where we are in the cycle. There's new episodes that are released every Wednesday. They're 30 minutes. They're short. They're punchy. I think this crypto cycle is harder to navigate than most. So let's do it together. Go subscribe to this podcast. Search The DeFi Report wherever you get your podcasts. YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or find the link in the show notes. There's a new episode waiting for you now. Ryan, how do you label Richard Hart? Who was he in crypto? He was the founder of Hex. He was a persona. Yeah, Ponzi scheme demagogue, maybe. Yeah. Like, cult leader, I think, actually, is one of the better descriptors of Richard Hart. Sure. Richard, he had been in crypto since I was in crypto. You know, the amount of people he got into Bitcoin is actually pretty notable. The amount of people I heard, oh, I'm embarrassed to say this, but I actually got into Bitcoin because of Richard Hart. Because of Richard Hart? Yeah. Yeah, he's one of these characters that, you know, in a different era, he would have started a literal religion if he was in the 1800s or something. Yeah, yeah, yeah. He was one of the first streamers before we have the modern streamers that we have today. He was like one of the first streamers. He created Hex and Pulsecoin, Pulsechain, PulseX, all that kind of stuff. A U.S. citizen that was living in Finland for quite a long time was arrested in Istanbul on an Interpol Red Notice. We might remember going back to when the SEC was going after Richard Hart because of the assets that he had issued. The Pulse X, all the things I just mentioned. Richard Hart actually won that case. This was the Interpol Red Notice was not because of the SEC, because that case was basically dismissed. That was dismissed on 20 in February of 2025 on jurisdictional grounds. This is what I learned this week. The way that Richard Hart got away with the SEC case was that, and this is something that when the Pulse chain and Pulse X and all that kind of stuff was being spun up by Richard Hart, the efforts of Richard Hart, you would send him ETH to a contract and then you would get Hex back in return. And it was like a one-to-one, you put in one ETH, you get the same amount of Hex back. And Richard Hart would say, like, you are not, this is not a sale. You are sacrificing. This is a sacrifice that you are making in order to get Hex. This is a, the Hex is a gift. The ETH to me is a gift. And the Hex back to you is also a gift. It's not a token sale. And also I'm in Finland. So you can't come after me, SEC. SEC. And so he raised something like hundreds of millions of dollars on this, on the idea that the HEX, the ETH being given to him was a gift because he loudly told everyone that this is a sacrifice. Well, the Finnish IRS was like, gifts, you say? Gifts are actually a taxable thing. We can tax that. That's not just like a miscellaneous category. A gift is – you can't just give people money, large amounts of money. That goes – that must pay through taxes. So the Finnish IRS says, oh – In this court case in the United States, you're saying that these are all gifts because now you owe us 30% of your hundreds of millions of dollars, which if you've ever watched Richard Hart for two seconds and all of his Rolexes and Gucci that he's bought, he's not paying taxes. He's not paying taxes. I didn't know that he was in Istanbul. I'm sure he knew that Interpol was after him. So he was in Turkey when he was arrested. And he is now in jail, I guess, going to court for Finnish tax fraud is actually the final conclusion of the Richard Hart story. Okay, well, what to make of Hex? What to make of Pulse Chain? What are the Hexakins actually doing about this? And by the way, I was never actually super sure. What exactly was Hex? Was it like an ERC-20 on Ethereum? It was an Ethereum copycat, but I have no idea, dude. This is sort of like a Tron type of copy-paste thing. I know it was from that era, the era that that started, but it never picked up actual use cases beyond pumping and shilling the Hexcoin itself. You clearly have not followed the Hex ecosystem stuff. Because the fact that it's like an EVM chain that was a clone of Ethereum is just not relevant to this story. The Hexakins are cult leaders of their deity, Richard Hart. Now, like, I have a take here. It's actually like Richard, you know what the difference between a cult and a religion is? What's the difference? Scale? The leader is dead. Oh, God. And so Richard Hart is like, he's going to jail. He's like being removed from the equation. I think the hexagons are going to get stronger as a result of this. Wow. Not weaker. Like, this is not, like, them, their crisis, they're not having a crisis of faith here. They're just going to double down because that's what cults do. What am I looking for on, like, CoinGecko? Like, is it Hex, Hexagon? What is this? Yeah, Hex, yeah. I'll see it. Hex was down, it dropped, it dropped, like, 50% on the news. All the Richard Hart tokens dropped, like, 50% on the news. Okay. I think it goes up from here. That's crazy. I guess maybe you're a future hexagon then, David? No, dude, the hexagons are still... I haven't seen the hexagons since the SEC case against Richard Hart. Like, I forgot that they exist, but now they're all up in my replies. They're in everyone's replies because people are remembering that they exist. They still exist, dude, and it was all the same ones. It's the same accounts. And these are real people. These aren't just like kind of Richard Hart's bot network. Yeah, because the Hexican cult army got started before LLMs were a thing. Like the Hexicans have been around for a long time. Well, I thought it was very big of you to post your David crying photo, the thing that has been memefied across crypto Twitter and like beyond, because this actually has a tie into the Hex story, doesn't it? It ought not to. The David crying moment on the weekly roll-up was just fatigue and sadness about the demise of FTX. and poor sleep right I had like terrible sleep I was running on like three hours of sleep a night for like four nights in a row because FTX was like in this slow motion implosion this is 2022 we were live streaming every single day I was exhausted um And, and so I was like, I was just sad about the state of the industry and the hole that we had dug ourselves. We were like, we were doing the weekly rollup and we had Richard Hart's tweet up on this screen completely coincidentally. And we just happened to be talking about that. And so like Richard Hart was like, this is, this is perfect for me. And so I actually still, oh, I still have this, this painting actually. This is a hexagon. Oh my God, a hexagon made that for you? Yeah, a hexagon painted this and shipped it to me. It's so beautiful. 100 USDC or something. That is so 2022. Yeah. So are you cool now with the hexagons? Is this like full circle? Are you posting this meme? I mean, they're not causing me any problems. I mean, like, I'm not going to go hang out with them because, like, I'm not. Why would I hang out with somebody who's compelled to become a Richard Hart, like, cuck? Okay, look, though, Richard Hart is arrested, but he still has his day in court, right? So, you know, he's, you know, who knows how the story could unfold. There might be still a layout for him. Yeah. Yeah, right. All right, let's get into paper trade. Ryan, have you ever been bullish on an asset and been like, man, I wish I could have 1000 times the exposure to that? Yes, like I'll take the upside on that, but I don't want the downside on that, if that makes sense. It's 1,000x up and not 1,000x down. Is that what paper gives me? I don't know if people have created that one. Okay. Paper Trade is a platform on top of hyperliquid that lets you go 1,000x long or short. No real spot orders are ever made. It's all synthetic, completely derivative only, which is why it's paper trade or trading paper. the beauty of this fantastic Ponzi game, and I say Ponzi game endearingly, like it's a great Ponzi. It's a really well- Wait, what's the Ponzi part? Have you described that? So when you get liquidated, because you win 1,000x. Which you will. If you're going 1,000x. You are compensated with the paper token. And the only way to get the paper token is by getting liquidated. It doesn't trade on secondaries. If you want paper tokens, you have to go long or short and get liquidated. Wait, if you get liquidated, they give you paper as compensation? So you could dry your tears with paper? Exactly, exactly. But then you can go and stake your paper and then you can get the fees, the liquidation fees from other people as well. And so you become the house by staking paper, you become the house. And so far, traders have lost $50 million, but $42 million has been paid out to paper stakers. So some of those degens who got liquidated just took their paper compensation and staked it and got the fees of other people getting liquidated. What an exceptional holder base you're creating. You're creating a bunch of holders of your token, of your asset that are like degenerate traders that have lost big money. Totally, totally. Yeah. Well, some people went onto the platform and like tried to get liquidated on purpose because they want the paper tokens. That's how you get the paper tokens. What a sick game. In the first week, the paper trade is beating the NASDAQ in volume. What? Yes, that is a true statement. So a trillion dollars of volume in the first week, a trillion dollars of open interest. What assets are we trading here, by the way? Is it crypto assets or is it everything? All the blue chips. I'm sure you can kind of go down market and get some of the more crazy ones. But I don't think you can go too far down the market because of the Oracle manipulation exploit that also happened this week. And so when you are on 1000x leverage, Oracle... attacks become pretty trivial because a trade on paper trade doesn't ever hit the order book. It doesn't ever hit the spot market. It's all synthetic. So a hyperliquid whale went to hyperliquid and started buying tens of millions of dollars in ETH while also having what I could only assume is a 1000x long ETH position on paper trade. You can move the mark in. You can move the market because it's all synthetic. And so as a result, the paper trade team had to just like kind of increase the constraints. They had to lower the caps on the open interest on some of these markets. So like this one trade made out with a few millions of dollars. I think it's recovered pretty well and people are kind of going back at it. But this is definitely one of the most interesting things, interesting projects to have started in crypto for sure. Why you say interesting? Because it's never been done before? It's 1,000x. Where else can you get... I think this is probably the most liquid place to get 1,000x exposure. Why do you need 1,000x exposure? It's like... To gamble. It's like the Tsar, like super megaton, you know, nuclear bomb. It's like, that's like way more than anyone has ever needed. Yeah, but what if it works out? You don't have to go 1000x. You can go like something more modest, like 200x. The novel thing that's really interesting to me is kind of the paper token distribution itself. That is fascinating. Yeah, that mechanism is pretty genius. Is this like a VC funded thing or? No, this is Jez and I'm forgetting the other person's name. They're in Pleaser Doubt, but I never got the Jez and Blurr. Yeah, I met Blur a number of times in 2021. So it's kind of like hyper liquid in that it's just like a small team self-funded in order to build this thing. Yeah, correct. Yeah. So there's not like a lot of paper float that's with VCs or, you know, third party investors. Correct. Interesting. That's right. Yeah. Which is one of the more attractive things about it, I think. Well, I'm happy for everyone that is trading paper. It's like, it's great. Yeah. All right, we got the Solana Appenglow upgrade coming down the pike on October 14th. That'll bring faster settlement to Solana, 150 milliseconds for settlement. This also will take away the on-chain vote transactions. So validators just send votes directly to each other and bundle them into certificates instead of posting individual vote transactions on-chain. So it's kind of an overhaul of the voting mechanism. And also the consensus mechanism is also getting an overhaul. So Solana's legacy tower BFT consensus mechanism is getting replaced and upgraded. And this is coming in Wednesday, October 21st. 21st. That's right. That's right. 150 milliseconds is pretty good. Fast. It's very fast. I don't think that's perfect settlement. I think it gets perfect settlement later, but you have like near perfect settlement at 150 milliseconds. Yeah. So what layer ones can do that now? I mean, and does that matter? Is that a big differentiator? I guess time will tell. Like Monad's doing that kind of thing. I mean, MegaEth promised to do that sort of thing. Yeah. It's like other factors matter a lot more this cycle than in previous cycles. It seems very much about distribution. Yeah. Yes. Yes. That's right. Speaking about layer ones, Starknet is voting to become a layer one. We talked about this last week where Ellie on Twitter just raised the idea of Starknet is investigating, open to the possibility of becoming a layer one. I think I saw you threw us a little bit of a shade, David. He said, like, we've been talking about— Well, I was throwing him some shade. Okay. about just like StarkNet always has been posturing about like leaving the Ethereum ecosystem. They've always been dissatisfied in some way about Ethereum. It wasn't meant to be shade, but it's more of just like, come on, just like, just do it. Just do it. And they are voting to do it. Who votes in this? Is it StarkNet? Is it validators or all holders of any Stark token? So they really have on-chain governance? On-chain governance then? Yeah, yeah. Interesting here. I don't know if it's on-chain governance. I think this is just like a sentiment check. So if the Stark community says yes, then the team will go into it. Right now, at the time of recording, 180 million Stark tokens have been cast. Would you like to guess which outcome according to the vote so far? Oh, it's going to be yes because token price has been up, right? Yeah. Right? That's a good point. 99.9% vote in favor of yes. Man. So what do you think that's, what do you think this means? What do you think this implies for layer twos in general, for Ethereum layer twos? I think that's the bigger story than like StarkNet. I think it means that like being a layer two is just not that much of a differentiator. I mean, we'll see. They need to move, they need to migrate off and then we need to get the data after the fact. I just feel like, so my conclusion probably like 18, 24 months ago after being bullish on layer twos prior to that or somewhat bullish for Ethereum prior to that was that layer twos were a complete side quest for Ethereum and Ethereum is much better off focusing on layer one block space and Ether the asset and DeFi use cases there. And this just feels like further evidence of that. I mean, like why subsidize a bunch of chains that you don't have like mode or lock in and clearly not getting enough value from you? Like why do that at all? I mean, Ethereum definitely needs to this cycle focusing on its layer one and Ether the asset. I 100% agree with that. Also, like StarkNet itself, it's not an EVM chain. It's got its own Cairo language. It's not that composable. And so one of the main benefits of all these other EVM chains is the composability with, you know, Ethereum itself. And so it's always kind of been on a silo. And so, like, is this a loss for Ethereum? Like, not necessarily. I would say it's mostly indifferent, not to throw any shade at StarkNet. Is this a win for StarkNet? Potentially because StarkNet is dependent on Ethereum and StarkNet is already post-quantum. And so they kind of get to shine that light. Overall, I kind of think in the grand scheme of things, this isn't going to be that big of a deal. Well, tell me if this is a big deal. So the Near Foundation just added MERT to the Near Foundation Council. Yeah. Yeah, the foundation board. Yeah, and so for Ethereum speak, this is like Vitalik, Aya, that one Swedish attorney, one more person who governs the EF. This is the governance board of NIR. So MERT. Ilya, a few other Nier co-founders, one more person who I'm getting. So Mert has joined the Nier Foundation board. I mean, Mert is just like really well-respected after kind of just like leading Solana's technical strengths into the Solana bull market. And then also seeing Zcash at $50 and pushing forward Zcash. I think this is because of privacy, Nier confidential intents and all the things that Nier is doing with like the whole privacy world. I think there's like a big Zcash Nier pairing because like Zcash private money, Nier has confidential intents. And so it's just like a very technical endorsement of Nier's tech, I think. Well, I guess merch star continues to rise as does Nier right now. I haven't heard that term ever used outside of the context of Nick Carter and the Bitcoiners. That's my favorite usage of it, though. Tell me about Venice. Yeah. Tokens per day chart. What is this chart showing us? Is the token, is VVP doing okay, by the way, in this alt downturn? As of this morning, VVD is doing one of the best, better performer in the market. Because usage is up. That's what this chart is telling us, right? Yeah, it's up 12% this week, all of that happening in the last 24 hours. So it was starting to like kind of slide with the rest of the market. It got down to like $21. $21. after being at a high of 34 at the very peak in September, got down to like, yeah, below $22, but it has rebounded up to $24.5 right now. And I think it's because of this chart. This chart, and then maybe also the data center clip that I tweeted out. But I think this chart is really sealing the deal. As a VVV holder, Whenever I see this chart on Twitter, I like stop what I'm doing and I pay attention because this is revenue for Venice. It is like highly correlated with revenue for Venice. It is adoption of the product. And I like this slope. And when this slope gets more aggressive upwards, I get more bullish. And so I like to ask John, the head of strategy at Venice, when he thinks Venice crosses one trillion tokens a day before or after the new year. We're at half that now, right? We are at half that now. And that is well ahead of. And that's the chart we're looking at. Token usage chart. That's the chart that we're looking at. So Sabrina, she works at Venice. She's the head of APIs at Venice. She tweeted out this chart, and it had flattened a little bit. And I was like, again, as a VVV holder, I was like, oh, I got it. So I don't like flat. It got flattened. No, I want it to go up. And four days later, she posts this new chart, and there is a 25-ish jump in daily token consumption on the Venice platform, all from this one model. This is a DeepSeek model. It's really good at coding. It gives very fast responses. But for some reason, this DeepSeek model just jumped massively in terms of consumption. Is the driver here token efficiency, do you think? Or is it more like privacy is really the driver here? Is people just don't want their AI queries being spied on? Right, because it's not any more efficient to do this inference via Venice versus doing it directly. I think the only explanation that I can have is like, why did Venice win this? It is privacy because that is their core competency. The other core competency that I think is coming online with Venice is like the combination of many models to do like more complicated work. in very cohered ways that are built together. That's their mind's product, but that's not what I see here. What I see here is I see one model just being hammered all at once in this idiosyncratic jump up where like the DeepSeq model was being used a similar amount as all the other models. But then you see this one model just jump from maybe like 10%, 5% of the graph to something like 50% of the graph. I see. My speculation is one single customer came online on the Venice API and that customer is using AI inference for whatever reason, either to resell it to people on their website who need inference or like one possible alternative is like there's a data sensitive industry that is using Venice for inference, maybe customer support. Maybe it's a healthcare company who's got customer support and they want an AI agent to automate some of their stuff and they are just hammering one single model to do customer support. Like that would fit, that would explain this chart. But like the notable thing is that it's, I think it's one single company who is using the Venice API and they're just using this one model and they're using it in a very big way. And it made the daily token consumption of Venice jump like 25% overnight. It's like signing a big enterprise customer, I guess. Exactly. That's what you're saying. Exactly. Exactly. Very cool. Well, David, I think we have to tie it off here, but you have a little moment from our old friend who we hadn't talked about in a long time, Elizabeth Warren, Senator Elizabeth Warren. She had a hot take on crypto that you wanted to share with the bankless world. No, it's not about crypto at all. It's about hot sauces, actually. Okay. She tweets out, Hellman's mayonnaise, McCormick's spices, Cholula hot sauce, Frank's red hot. What do all of these products have in common? One company could soon control them all. I have concerns that McCormick and Unilever's $45 billion merger could increase your grocery prices. getting protected from big hot sauce what is going how is this a real tweet that's a valid concern I don't know I feel like Elizabeth Warren is not conspiracy theorizing in the way that like kind of the world demands right now this is not a very deep conspiracy theory to me dude you gotta go after something far bigger I mean we're doing aliens we're doing all sorts like reptile yeah dream bigger dreams Elizabeth Warren like find a bigger fish My Lord, our hopefully next week we can get some green in the market. But until then, Bankless Nation, crypto is risky. You can lose what you put in. We are Head to West. This is Frontier. It's not for everyone, but we're glad you're with us on the Bankless Journey. Thanks a lot. Thanks a lot.
