Elon Merges Companies, WHCA Cuts Comedian, and Guest Co-Host Jen Psaki

Kara Swisher: Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine, the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher. Scott is off today, and in his place, I got someone much more superior. I brought in Jen Psaki, the host of MSNBC's "Inside with Jen Psaki," who also has a new podcast, "The Blueprint," which is excellent. I recommend everyone to listen to it. We're doing a little crossover event because I was on her show this weekend. She promised to bring dirty jokes in Scott's absence on the show. Welcome, Jen.

Jen Psaki: I mean, Kara, first of all, as a listener, as I told you yesterday, I was like, "I have to bring inappropriate jokes and inappropriate things to be said." But I don't know that that's my vibe. I'm just trying to be my authentic self.

Kara Swisher: Do you have any? Do you have a dirty joke that you promised on the air last night?

Jen Psaki: I really don't, but maybe the conversation will bring me around to it.

Kara Swisher: Okay. Maybe it'll bring me around to it. Feel free to.

Jen Psaki: I'll feel free to say inappropriate things. I feel freed. I feel freed on your podcast.

Kara Swisher: All right. I mean, we've got a lot to get to today, but how is it going there? Now, explain what you're doing. You're doing 103 shows for MSNBC, is that correct?

Jen Psaki: Approximately.

Kara Swisher: What's the pitch?

Jen Psaki: Well, right now I'm doing a show on Sundays. I'm doing a show on Mondays. They're a little different because Sundays, which you were on yesterday, it's a different thing. People are sitting down with their coffee. They want big picture. That's what we try to do. And Mondays is just "what the hell just happened today." So it's a little bit different.

Kara Swisher: I have a podcast called "The Blueprint." Explain what "The Blueprint" is, why it's called "The Blueprint." You and I talked about this.

Jen Psaki: Yeah, I mean, "The Blueprint" was my form of therapy. I don't know if you find podcasting to be therapeutic. But for me, it was after the election. And I, like many people, I was like, "What the hell just happened?" I wasn't shocked, but I just felt like so many things were missed, including by me, and so many things I got wrong. So for me, my therapy was making a list of people who I felt would be candid, say what they actually thought, not pretend like they know all the answers because no one does. I made kind of a list. I like write everything on note cards. I'm like an old lady. But I made like a back of the envelope list of people. Some of them, I think you know all of them, right? It's like people who would just say what's on their minds. Jemele Hill, Rahm Emanuel, Don Lemon. None of these people are holding back. So we did that. We were only going to do six episodes. We ended up doing nine. And we're going to reboot it in the fall.

Kara Swisher: Oh, great. So why "The Blueprint"? Explain for the kids who don't know what a blueprint is.

Jen Psaki: I know. I think you told me. We talked about this, and you're like, "It's a very old-timey phrase. We're going to do the horse and carriage."

Kara Swisher: Guys, like so many people, I consult with the great Kara Swisher about every career move and thing I do in my life.

Jen Psaki: We're going to do the mimeograph. That's what I said. Remember the mimeograph?

Kara Swisher: What did we call it? The record player. Would people relate to that? Actually, they're back. They're back, Jen.

Jen Psaki: I know. My daughter has a record player. The blueprint is not back, but go ahead. Please explain.

Kara Swisher: We're bringing it back. We're bringing it back.

Jen Psaki: Okay. "The Blueprint" is "How do Democrats win again?" So reflecting on what just happened, what people got wrong, but also looking ahead to what to change moving forward. And there's a lot of criticism people have for episodes we've done so far, which I think is healthy. People don't all disagree with each other either. And that's kind of the point. So that's the purpose.

Kara Swisher: When you're thinking about this, your transition from politics, it's been a while. You and I met right before you started, after you left the White House. What's it been like for you shifting over?

Jen Psaki: I mean, the initial stages were a combo of I literally had never seen a teleprompter before. I didn't know what it looked like. And it's not the most important thing, but you want to be functional enough on it that it's smooth. And the biggest part of it is if it's your own words and your own voice, which sounds obvious, but it isn't always. So learning how to use a teleprompter, read a teleprompter, and really learning how to write for TV, which is different from writing for a politician or writing a book or writing an op-ed. So that was its own kind of technical transition.

I also think when you transition careers, sometimes you think you have to become a version of what you see. Like I have to look at anchors and be an anchor. And really, you just have to be yourself. And it took me a while to feel comfortable, not too long, but a little bit comfortable in what that meant.

And the other thing I was very mindful of when I started was I'd obviously been Joe Biden's press secretary until a couple of months before I started and until about eight months before my show started. And I think you and I talked about this. I was taught a lot about not wanting to be perceived as his spokesperson, but also not being inauthentically, all of a sudden, "I'm down the middle" because I'm not. I mean, I've worked in politics for 20 years. I'm not down the middle. I have points of view. And so that was its own kind of journey for me.

Now, when the debate debacle happens and I said what I saw, as everybody saw, that maybe broke the fever of that. That wasn't my intention. But now it's a little different because we have a new show. It's going to be at 9 o'clock on Tuesdays through Fridays. It's launching in May. And one of the things I've been thinking a lot about is that I kind of shied away from talking as much about my own experience and my experience in government and politics. I do sometimes. But now it feels like there is this real hunger. And I know this anecdotally. I know this from people who message me on social media or email. I know this from people I run into at the airport. "How the hell does this work? How's this supposed to work? What's broken? What's not?" And I think I didn't, Lord knows, work for the current president.

Kara Swisher: There's many, many Democrats. That would be funny. That would be a great show.

Jen Psaki: Oh, my God. Many, many Democrats who may run for office president one day. Who the hell knows? I root for all of them. But I don't have any dog in the fight. You know what I mean? So now I feel like I can dive back into that a lot more.

Kara Swisher: And give your expertise.

Jen Psaki: And give my expertise. And I think I shied away from that initially because I was so worried about being perceived as kind of this continuing spokesperson.

Kara Swisher: Right, right. So we're going to give you a little workout today on that. So you're going to have a lot to get to today. Including Tesla protests worldwide, Elon buying his own company, a weird kind of flim-flammy kind of thing, and Trump's latest pardoning spree. And we're also going to talk a little bit about the White House Correspondents Association, which you have had a lot of experience with. I have some thoughts on all the things.

Jen Psaki: Good. Oh, great.

Kara Swisher: Okay. So let's first talk with the latest with Signalgate. I call it whiskey leaks.

Jen Psaki: I know. You love that.

Kara Swisher: So you can call it whatever you want. I love that word. I like that whiskey leaks. It's good. Come on. I'm sorry if you could have that, but you deserve it. This weekend, there were reports that Trump was asking around for opinions on whether he should fire National Security Advisor Waltz. But when asked by NBC, the president said he doesn't, quote, "fire people because of fake news and witch hunts." Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is really helping the "We're Not Messy" cause by reportedly bringing his wife to two meetings with foreign military counterparts where sensitive information was discussed. So talk about this. Like you've been in there where there's been a gate, blank gate, whatever it happens to be. Every administration has them. Something occurs. What happens inside versus outside? And this is a unique president who just doesn't want to give in to the media. I think that is a bigger deal than people realize. But neither did Biden, right? Biden probably doesn't either, right?

Jen Psaki: Well, no president does. First of all, every president, I work for two, they're all pissed off when the press writes things about them that are negative, even if they're entirely fair. Now, Trump is obviously uniquely against the freedom of press, I would say. People may argue that, but I think that's a fair statement.

Now, normally in a case like this, what would happen is you have a scandal, a controversy, whatever it may be. You get together. In this case, if it were, let's just say normal times for a moment, I would have gotten together with Jake Sullivan and the national security team and Anita Dunn and Ron Klain. And we all would have talked about what actually happened here. You want to have a full understanding of the full damage. So it's not drip, drip, drip. This is the biggest communications 101 mistake is not having a whole understanding of all of the things that could come out.

And in this case, it would have been what were the other Signal chains? Which is probably knowable internally, but Mike Waltz also had that automatic delete after 30 days. The administration's 60, 70-something days old, and they had access to classified information during the transition, so it could have even gone beyond that. And you would have decided, what are we going to say about it? Is it something the press secretary says? Is it something Jake Sullivan comes and talks at the briefing about, and then I answer questions? And then before you do any of that, you go get it approved by the president. That's a normal process. There's no doubt that's not what happened here. But that's what you would normally do.

It looks like everyone was freelancing because he had that disastrous—Waltz was disastrous. Even on Fox News, he was disastrous. If Laura Ingraham doesn't believe your line of bullshit, you're kind of fucked.

Kara Swisher: Well, and Kara, I mean, if you start your answer with something about "some people say I'm a conspiracy theorist" or there's a—then you sound like a conspiracy theorist. I mean, it's like, what are we—

Jen Psaki: So, yes, they're all freelancing. And Pete Hegseth was freewheeling somewhere.

Kara Swisher: Well, Pete Hegseth went out. I mean, there's the crazy video from last week after Jeffrey Goldberg had put out the full—you don't have to call them war plans. They're specific logistical military attack details. After that had already been out on The Atlantic, Pete Hegseth went to the cameras. He talks very loudly and aggressively when he's trying to deny something, which he has a lot of experience doing. But he went out and denied it. I also feel like this whole thing of "they just admit that there was a mistake and then we'd move on"—I don't think Democrats would have. I don't think they should have. I mean, this is just kind of like a fuck up.

Jen Psaki: Right. The fuck up.

Kara Swisher: So what happens now? What happens now when it's still here? It still hasn't left. It's a little bit like a sore that won't heal.

Jen Psaki: Well, I mean, I think there's a question. Does Mike Waltz survive? He's the easiest one to fire because it's not a confirmed position. And any president can name anyone they want to that position, just like any other political appointee in the White House. People can hate the choice, but he's the easiest one to fire. Pete Hegseth is probably the one who's more justified to be fired. I mean, you could argue whatever, because he's the one who put the information on there. But then he's going to nominate a new defense secretary. And I think all the reporting, which I think is true for any president, is you step away from a cabinet member and that makes you look weak, too. So that seems to be part of the discussion, I would bet. Plus getting someone to confirm for that job. So brazen it out is a better tactic here.

Kara Swisher: Well, look, if he fires Mike Waltz, then he just names another national security advisor. So they don't mind shoving him out. But I don't think they will. I don't think they will. Do you?

Jen Psaki: Yeah, I don't think they will.

Kara Swisher: I don't think he'll survive it.

Jen Psaki: Yeah, exactly.

Kara Swisher: So more on Trump's feuds with lawsuits. WilmerHale and Jenner & Block have sued the Trump administration over executive orders targeting them for employing attorneys or representing groups he doesn't like. Since being in office, Trump has signed five executive orders targeting law firms with punishments. One firm, Paul Weiss, got out of Trump's crosshairs by agreeing to perform $40 million worth of pro bono work for Trump-friendly causes. Skadden, another major law firm, has agreed to provide $100 million of free legal work. Federal judges have temporarily blocked Trump's efforts to punish WilmerHale, Jenner & Block, and others like Perkins Coie are pushing back. How do you think about this? Because this is something maybe you wished you could have done in the Biden administration, but you're always—and a lot of these firms are doing it for financial reasons because clients will leave them if they don't have security clearances or if the Trump administration is hostile to them. So they would see an exit of clients, presumably.

Jen Psaki: Well, which is why they're doing it.

Kara Swisher: Right.

Jen Psaki: I don't think we ever would have wished we could have done it. Maybe some people did. I just feel like it's got such a bad—it's kind of counter to what most presidents argue they're for, which is kind of rule of law. And you can be pissed off about what courts do, but it doesn't mean you ignore it. And it doesn't mean you pressure law firms not to represent clients. I mean, there's lots of things to be worried about right now, but this is one I think that's a legit one to be worried about.

Kara Swisher: Tell me why from your perspective.

Jen Psaki: Well, because I think you have these law firms who are making a business decision—not a crime—but also one where it's a version, in my view, of obedience in advance. It is deciding that in order to survive, which they have to do as a business and as a law firm, you are going to agree to things that you wouldn't normally agree to. And you give Trump power over you. And I think for any president, that's dangerous. We have Democrat or Republican, but there's not a Democrat who tried to do that.

Kara Swisher: So that—but what do you—does it concern you? Even if they lose, because the judges are pushing back on these things, it will have done business damage to these companies and these law firms. And so it doesn't matter. And then I think later administrations, including Democratic ones, will be looking at a lot of these moves and thinking, "Hmm, this worked." And maybe they may not have the permission structure Trump has, but it's not something—once it's crossed, you're like, "Huh, could I do that?" Even if you say "I'd never do that," you kind of are like, "I could maybe have a little more influence over irritating lawyers or irritating press people. So maybe I'll sue a little bit more." I think it opens a floodgate of behaviors. And I think if Democrats think they'd never do it, I think they're not telling the truth.

Jen Psaki: I don't—I think some Democrats would do it. I just—maybe I just think, though—

Kara Swisher: So it's kind of what I mean is if you're arguing part of your argument is "I believe in kind of the rule of law and I believe in kind of the legal system," then making these sort of frontal deals with law firms feels counter to that. I mean, so I don't know. I just—I guess there's lots of things Trump does and that Trump administration does that maybe do open floodgates. But not in this case.

Kara Swisher: So one of the things that's interesting is which firms are agreeing and which firms are not. That is interesting. To me, that's really like, why has these others saying "no fucking way" and the others are going along with it? And that to me is a really interesting thing. And then what it does to their businesses, because I don't mean to be rude, but I don't find lawyers to be the most backbony of people. Like journalists are a different thing. When they start suing journalists, they may stick together, although we'll get to that later. Or they aren't, in the case of the White House correspondents. They're not joining as a group. But I do think that they—I'd really like to understand why others, even though they're trying to stop these punishments and federal judges are blocking these efforts, why certain groups didn't. Because presumably they all have the same business problem going forward. Do you think they're making a business calculation of their own that they can get—but it's like liberal causes. How does that make them the same amount of money as businesses that—I mean, you see this in kind of the consulting world. Which is like, it's really hard—not "woe poor Democrats"—but what's true is it's very hard to get hired right now as a Democrat. And a person who's left the Biden administration, no matter how good and whatever your skill set is, because every company is like, "We need closer ties to Trump." Not to you.

Jen Psaki: Yeah.

Kara Swisher: That's every calculation. Now, these things are cyclical.

Jen Psaki: Well, let's hope they're cyclical. I will hope they're cyclical. But yeah, I guess it's a calculation of that sort. But what businesses—I don't know, what do you think? What businesses are going to be like, "Well, they're not falling prey to this, so I'm going to go with that." I don't know.

Kara Swisher: If I were in the law firm, it's four years. "I better do what he wants for the next, and then later I'll get him." Or at least the next year and a half or two, because then who knows? Because then payback can be a bitch.

Jen Psaki: Well, yeah, the House could be controlled by Democrats. It could be a little bit more like, "We're going to investigate why you gave in here."

Kara Swisher: Yeah, yeah, exactly. So it's coming and going. It just—I think it does create a really interesting situation for Democrats to whether they're going to be as bullying going forward. And you don't think they will.

Jen Psaki: I think they will. I think, you know—

Kara Swisher: Maybe I'm naive about the law firm thing. And I may be. I may be.

Jen Psaki: I'm not. I do think they're going to be more bullying about other things. The law firm thing—you're right. Like their businesses, they have to make calculations. And maybe—I don't know.

Kara Swisher: Well, where they're attacking is law firms, judges, media. It sort of makes a lot of sense, and it's very strict. It's a very strict effort to stymie law firms from defending press people, for example.

Jen Psaki: Correct. Things like that. Or taking on clients that would remotely offend the Trump administration.

Kara Swisher: That's correct. So is that what you want to agree to? And that does—I mean, again, doesn't it feel counter to why people say they went to law school?

Jen Psaki: Yes, it does.

Kara Swisher: But that's—they also like money quite a bit, Jen. I don't know if you know that.

Jen Psaki: I understand that.

[Break]

Kara Swisher: We'll go on a quick break. When we come back, Elon hits the campaign trail in Wisconsin and also acquires his own company.

[Ad Break]

Kara Swisher: Jen, we're back. Elon says the destiny of humanity rests on the Wisconsin Supreme Court election, which is happening Tuesday. Elon appeared at a town hall in Green Bay, Wisconsin on Sunday where he gave out million-dollar checks to two Wisconsin voters. He also wore a cheese hat at one point. He didn't look bad in the cheese hat, I'll be honest with you. Most people don't look good in cheese hats, so I guess that's a pro.

Jen Psaki: I think it's okay. I think it worked for him.

Kara Swisher: Okay. And blamed George Soros when he was heckled, which is kind of ironic since he was paying people to be there. The Wisconsin Attorney General did try to stop the giveaway, but his suit was rejected by the state Supreme Court just before Elon's event began. Elon and his affiliated groups have now spent over $20 million to help the conservative candidate in this judicial race. We're recording a day before the election. I'd love you to sort of assess his political—if you're in a political suit, like, how do you think his communications are? How do you think his impact is? By the way, there are also two special House elections in Florida this week to fill Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz's seats. The race for Waltz's seat is tighter than Republicans expected, although both Republicans are expected to win there. Talk to me a little bit about what the Elon effect is happening. Again, there were Tesla takedown protests all over the country, some very creative. And it's ongoing, and it's really affected Tesla's stock as much as President Trump and others are trying hard to stop it.

Jen Psaki: I mean, I think his power is his money. And his money is not paying for—I mean, as much as he was in Wisconsin on Sunday, it's not paying for "Hi, I'm Elon Musk, go out and vote in the Wisconsin state Supreme Court race." It's paying for all sorts of things, including convincing—getting people to register or to vote to participate in this, whatever we're calling this, a raffle. I don't even know how to call it, the thing where he gives out money. A raffle. So that's his money is his power. I mean, as and his platforms are his power. His platforms are his power. And so I don't think any Democrats should underestimate that.

At the same time, he's more unpopular than Trump. And I don't think Trump—if there were Democrats, if there were House races now, I don't think any House candidates would put him in an ad. But they would happily take his money and they'd happily get his favor so that they would get favored status on Twitter or X or whatever the hell.

Kara Swisher: Or not be attacked by Trump.

Jen Psaki: Or not be attacked. Right. There's lots of ways to look at that. I mean, so, and the Wisconsin State Supreme—we'll see what the turnout is. But it's still, you know, you talk to Democrats, Ben Wickler, who's the party chair and others, and they say the turnout's going to be high. That may be the case, but it's still a state Supreme Court race. It's not a governor's race. It's not a presidential race. And the money he's spending there matters. So that's where I think his power is.

Kara Swisher: So money, just money. Do you think—I mean, his "destiny of humanity"—I think he's done this about—I've heard him do it 27 times in the time I've known him. It's like, "If Tesla doesn't survive, humanity is doomed," he told me once. And I was like, "Okay, all right, sure, Chad." And one of the things that's—he's very dramatic about this. But isn't it positive for him to be so—like, imagine a Democratic president and say Reid Hoffman decides he wants to be next to the president at all times. And there was a little bit of pushback in the Obama administration when Eric Schmidt was there too much.

Jen Psaki: Yeah.

Kara Swisher: He was buddies with Jim Messina. I think they were on speed dial.

Jen Psaki: Yes, exactly.

Kara Swisher: So how do you deal with that? Do you think it's a good thing, or has it gone too far here? Everybody says they're going to have a breakup. They are. You and I disagreed. I don't think they're going to break up. Why would they? Their money is good. He's a heat shield. Those are my arguments.

Jen Psaki: Yeah. I mean, the heat shield, I think, is the most clear—as long as he continues to be a heat shield. I think where we disagreed, and I feel like you have some sort of insider trading knowledge because you just like know him better than I do, is like, will he be there in a year? Himself, because of his businesses.

Kara Swisher: Well, no, will Elon Musk still be like in the Trump orbit in a year? You think yes, right?

Jen Psaki: Yes.

Kara Swisher: I think no, although I only bet $5.

Jen Psaki: Okay, all right. So why no? Tell me, I'll tell you my yes in a second, but why no from your perspective?

Kara Swisher: I think if Musk feels like a political problem to Trump—I know he's a heat shield, but you can go from a heat shield to becoming a political problem, including if Democrats get their act together and figure out a more effective way of talking about DOGE cuts and cuts to Social Security and things like that. Then he's not going to be as convenient as a buddy. So then he won't be as around as much in the orbit.

Jen Psaki: Right. And how do you limit or excise someone like that? Just so people are aware, Tesla's shares are down another 4% today. It's down 13% for the month, although year over year, he's up 50%. It took a big leap during when Trump won.

Kara Swisher: Well, do you think Musk would exit himself or you think it's Trump exiting him when he?

Jen Psaki: I think he exits himself, his business interests, but he seems to be doing all kinds of manner of hoping AI, using the AI bubble and things like that. So I don't see Trump cutting ties with him. I just don't. I just think it's too problematic. He's brought him in too close. What happens? How do you deal with an angry Elon Musk? Because he's unstable. He could do anything with enormous amounts of money. I think you keep him in the tent no matter.

Kara Swisher: You have other rich friends who take his place in the tech world or other worlds. But I'm talking about an unhinged Elon Musk attacking you. Like that could be a very—it would be the story.

Jen Psaki: It's a great story.

Kara Swisher: Well, maybe, but I don't—Trump, I don't know how much he cares. Like he's had plenty of people attacking him all the time. I mean, so, you know, how do you rid him? I mean, I don't mean to sound dark here. I'm saying he can go, whatever. You just put someone else in charge of DOGE. You say this guy is out of whack or whatever. You say, "I don't know, who knows?"

Kara Swisher: He offs people all the time in terms of his orbit. So there's all sorts of ways to off Elon Musk in his orbit. I think that the interesting thing to me is if, to your point, is if Trump and Musk at some point have a falling out. I think there was a theory, which I don't think you ever agreed with, that it might be a short honeymoon. It's already a long honeymoon. I didn't think. And there's an interesting thing for the future of the Republican Party. I mean, if you're J.D. Vance, you don't want to be in the crosshairs of Trump, but you also don't want to be in the crosshairs of Elon Musk.

Jen Psaki: That's correct.

Kara Swisher: J.D. Vance is like 40 something. He's maybe around for a long time. Maybe he wears that as welcome with Republicans, too. I have no idea. But if you're a lot of these future Republicans, you care about Musk and you care about Steve Bannon, who doesn't like Musk. So that's a different, that's an interesting calculation if Trump and Musk have a falling out. Which way do you go with these of them?

Jen Psaki: Yeah, it's interesting.

Kara Swisher: So last question, one of the things we talked about was the idea of these protests, because thousands of people over 250 protested him over the weekend with rallies held at these Tesla showrooms around the world. The protests were part of the so-called Tesla takedown movement, an effort to push back against him, encourage people to stop buying them. Protesters branded signs that said things like "fight the billionaire bolligarchy" and "send Musk to Mars now." What do you make of these protests? They seem, I don't think there is, you know, Musk is blaming victimization. These are real protests people really don't like. My son writes me about it now. He's like, "What an asshole." And he liked him, right? And so how do you look at these from a Democratic perspective? Is it a good thing for the Democratic Party to see these happening? Or to me, they just don't like him. Like Reid Hoffman says, they just don't like you, bro. That's why they're there. They don't like him.

Jen Psaki: I think it's furthering the heat shield that you've talked about, and I totally agree with, because it is taking the energy and anger that you are seeing from a lot of Democrats out there and directing it at Tesla. Now, I think it's very warranted. Elon Musk has done some very bad things. But I kind of wish these people were protesting about Trump and Social Security or Trump and something else, Medicaid cuts. Because I don't know, ultimately, are people going to go to the polls in November and in November a year and a half from now about Tesla? I mean, I'd be surprised. Lots of things can happen. But I think that's the only thing that's a little... Is that you wish they were, this is what they're mad about and not anything else. I wish it was something, I wish they directed all of their pain, anger, and passion, which is a good thing.

Kara Swisher: What can Democrats do to cycle that in?

Jen Psaki: Well, I mean, this is presumably somewhere organic. I haven't seen, but you tell me, that these Tesla protests, are they being organized by any, like, Democratic grassroots groups?

Kara Swisher: Some are. Some are. Some are. Just like every other protest. That's everything.

Jen Psaki: But I think there are things that are happening that are sort of organic but have been, you know, Indivisible and others have been additive to it like these town hall meetings. Showing up at town hall meetings being held in Republican districts. More of that. I think though there's not enough Democrats who are doing that. There are plenty who are doing, there are some who are doing it, I should say, but there needs to be more of that and people, for people to feel like they have a place to go and to direct their energies. I don't know. I still think there's some work on the coordination and what the messaging is and what people should be doing who are writing letters and things. A lot of it is still about Tesla and maybe it will be for a while about Tesla.

Kara Swisher: That's a really good point. Yeah, it shouldn't be about Tesla because then he's not the president. He's not the president. That's why it doesn't get affected of Trump. Although Trump's affiliation with Elon is so strong, it does have residual effects. And one of the things, speaking of money, Elon Musk's X has been acquired by Elon Musk's xAI. Elon announced the deal on X saying the two companies' futures are intertwined. They've already been intertwined, by the way. They're using X data and this technology for Grok, which is their product. This officially combines the data models, compute, and distribution of talent. It officially does, but it's already been combined, by the way, everybody. The all-stock deal valued xAI at $80 billion and X at $33 billion. I don't think that takes into account the debt, but I'm not sure. There's a big debt thing on there. The price is down from $44 billion Elon paid in 2022, but it's higher than a recent $12 billion valuation. I think this is all made up because I think the company has never been a particularly good business. And all it does is it hides it now. It hides it completely within this AI boomlet. And even xAI probably shouldn't be worth $80 billion. It doesn't make anything. It doesn't make any money. It makes a lot of noise. And he's not alone in this. All the other AI companies are high. But he's just putting money from one pocket into the other. And it just looks good because what he's doing is attaching. I wouldn't be surprised if he brings Tesla in on this too and merges it into Tesla and then completes the picture to bring Tesla shares up, giving it an AI value, essentially.

Jen Psaki: That's why he's doing it, you think? It gives it like this fake, phony boost?

Kara Swisher: Until it's not, right? Someone's going to get ahead in AI, and so why not just fold them together and then you don't understand the actual businesses themselves.

Jen Psaki: Yeah. I mean, you know, the interesting thing about reading the stories about this made me think about the early days after the purchase when, one, I think it would, did it happen in the spring of like two years ago? When did this happen? Am I remembering this correctly? This is relevant only because at the correspondence dinner, which I still attend many years later.

Kara Swisher: We're going to talk about that next.

Jen Psaki: Yes, but I sat next to Linda Yaccarino, who was still at NBC at the time. And I was like, she's nice. She's fun and interesting. I remember, now you're going to be like, you're naive. You're naive. And I was like, oh, she's very engaging. And then like a week later, she went to Twitter or X or whatever they were still called at that time. And I was like, wow, I kind of misread that whole situation. That was a real reflection moment. But you remember the early days when it was like, thank you for being a source of where I could share my thoughts and I know you're going to disappear. And there was this kind of fear of your followers going away. I mean, I've had I've decreased followers, of course, as anybody who is not a right winger has done for the most part of the last couple of years. But, you know, at the time, I'd like 1.4 million followers. And I'm like, well, man, I want to see when this happens. But this is like I've built up a following now. And now it's just like, no, no, I'm saying this is how I felt a couple years ago. Now it's just like a dumpster fire of hellish, horrible.

Kara Swisher: Are you on there still? Jen, are you still on there? You need to get on.

Jen Psaki: I haven't deleted my account, but I really don't engage.

Kara Swisher: Neither have I, because I don't want Linda Yaccarino to do something funny with it. That's really pretty much.

Jen Psaki: Oh, that's fair. So I don't engage on it, but I still have an account.

Kara Swisher: You still have an account. That's probably the best way to do it. And lots of insane fake accounts. I'll have to do something about it at some point, but I, you know, whatever. I don't really care. She got mad at me because I called her that nice ad lady from Queens. But because I don't think she has any technological experience and is just there for window dressing for Elon. Now she presumably will disappear into whatever this is. I'd be shocked, maybe he'll make her CEO, but she'll be a sinecure CEO.

Jen Psaki: Well that's what she wanted, right, at the time?

Kara Swisher: No, I think she really thought she was in there with him shoulder to shoulder. I think that's not true, but whatever. Who knows? I don't really care what happens to her career. Honestly, I could care less.

Jen Psaki: Same. Hard same.

Kara Swisher: I met her once.

Jen Psaki: Yeah, exactly. Well, you missed it. You missed it. She's quite conservative. You missed that part. Clearly.

Kara Swisher: She's quite— Clearly. She always was. If you spend enough time with her, you're like, what? And you'd be like, oh, I'm going to go now. I remember that. When she was at NBC, she said something sort of right-wingy. I'm like, you know what? My mother annoys me enough. I don't need you on top of it. That's how I felt. I need to limit the number of right-wing people that I engage with on a regular basis.

Jen Psaki: Well, I was like, I don't even know you. And my mother, I have to still talk to.

Kara Swisher: So one of the things about this purchase is it's just a way to get the benefit of an AI valuation and pretend that Twitter is an actual business. When it is, at best, a middling advertising business that she's never going to transform because it missed the boat many, many, many moons ago to Facebook and Meta. So whatever. Good luck with this, Elon. We'll see.

Jen Psaki: It doesn't— here's what it does. I'll make one more point. It doesn't improve the product. Nothing in this is about the products of either of these things. What they're going to sell to consumers, how they're going to make money. It's all about the financial transaction. And to me, that's a big red flag.

Kara Swisher: But did he ever care about the product?

Jen Psaki: No.

Kara Swisher: He does. That's not true.

Jen Psaki: No, no, no. No about X now. He doesn't. Twitter. Twitter. X.

Kara Swisher: You think he cares about the product?

Jen Psaki: I think he did initially and then doesn't care now. He's using it as a cudgel is what he's doing.

Kara Swisher: Alright Jen, let's go on a quick break. When we come back, Trump is on a pardon spree.

[Break]

Kara Swisher: Jen, we're back. President Trump commuted the criminal fraud sentence of Ozy Media founder Carlos Watson, just hours before Watson was due in prison. The company falsely claimed to have deals with Google and Oprah Winfrey and would have owed fines over $90 million. Watson is convicted of conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud, which he did, and identity theft, which he did, and was sentenced to 10 years. Trump also pardoned Trevor Milton, the founder of electric truck maker Nikola, who was convicted of misleading investors. Same pattern. Milton was represented by Brad Bondi, brother of A.G. Pam Bondi in a securities fraud trial. Do you think Trump will be the latest investor in the Fyre Festival, too, the way this is going? Do presidents usually do this in the middle of a term?

Jen Psaki: No, no. Oh, I mean, also, I mean, the end, right?

Kara Swisher: Right. And also, I mean, these two thematic fraudsters, it feels also to me. It's like the Eric Adams thing in the sense that.

Jen Psaki: Oh, yeah.

Kara Swisher: It's a little mobby. Right. Because it's like Carlos Watson, who I've met a couple of times. I don't know well or anything, but like.

Jen Psaki: Did you like him, too?

Kara Swisher: No, he was around Democratic circles.

Jen Psaki: He was around Democratic circles. This is my point. Right. Yeah.

Kara Swisher: So you're like an Eric Adams was a I don't know. I think he still considers himself a top. Who knows? But like these they now feel kind of an obligation to Trump. Right. I mean, some version of it.

Jen Psaki: Of course they do.

Kara Swisher: So that's what reminds me of a mobby mobby thing. The other thing about this Milton pardon, Trump said one of my biggest pet peeves is when people talk about themselves in the third person, which Trump is not the only one who does this, but he does it a lot, where he said the thing he did wrong was he supported a gentleman named Trump. Right. That was Trump talking about pardon. And it's like, I don't know the guy well, but he supported me. It's like he gets pulled into these fraudsters who he wants to validate because I think it validates him. That's what it feels like it's about. But, yeah, you know, you don't really do it in the middle. Is this if you were working for Biden and he suddenly started doing this, what would you run into the Oval Office and say what the actual fuck or what?

Jen Psaki: Yeah. Yes. I mean, you know, it's like, yes, because in a normal case, though, here's the thing Trump knows. There's so much shit flying out there that like we're talking about this. You're talking about this. Is everybody going to talk about this? No, because there's so many other things going on. So it can be kind of buried in the burying of all, you know, which is why he does things like say he's going to run for a third term. Right. It's like he wants to. We're not even talking. I'm saying he's doing it because he wants to change subject. He wants to talk about it. So, yes.

Kara Swisher: What's he changing the subject from?

Jen Psaki: I think he, well, a couple things. Signal Gate, which I don't, I'm not saying this is going to be a political problem for him forever. But, hey, there have been a few polls and people hate it, including Republicans. And he knows it makes him look kind of weak in the national security world. Elections, special elections tomorrow. Who knows what will happen? Maybe they'll win all three. But even if Josh Weil loses by five points, that's not great for Trump. Right. That's a little bit of sign of political weakness. It was Michael Waltz's seat. Maybe some of the tax, you know, who knows? I think there's just like he'd like to talk about there's still again. I know I keep talking about this, but like a bunch of his advisers, including his commerce secretary, keeps talking about social security in ways that are like hugely problematic for anyone who reads a poll ever. So yeah, it's changing the subject from a lot of other things.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, that's true. That is true. That's exactly what he's doing. He's doing a good job at it, though. So last thing, the White House Correspondents Association has canceled comedian Amber Ruffin's scheduled appearance at its annual dinner. WHCA President Eugene Daniels said in a statement that the organization decided not to have the comedian to ensure the focus is not on the politics of division. The cancellation came a day after the White House Chief of Staff Taylor Budowich slammed Ruffin on X. He shared a clip from a recent appearance on the Daily Beast podcast, where she referred to Trump administration as "kind of a bunch of murderers." She's a comic. Her girlfriend also revealed the guidance she got from the Correspondents Association in that podcast interview. Let's listen.

[Audio clip plays: "They were like, you need to be, you know, equal and make sure that you give it to both sides and blah, blah, blah. I was like, there's no way I'm going to be freaking doing that, dude. Under no circumstances."]

Kara Swisher: So as someone who attended the dinner, you've been at some of the more controversial ones, both as a member of the White House presidency team and a member of the media. It's not clear if Trump is planning on attending the dinner he has in the past. And Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has already said she's not going. The White House correspondents seem to be giving. They're also deciding where everybody sits, right? They were going to have the president now decide where they sit. And they could push the main media out of the front seats. They've already also knocked AP out. There's all kinds of things. When you look at this, you didn't do much with the White House correspondents. They just ran their own show, right?

Jen Psaki: Correct? Also, like, you don't have to agree to what they say, you know, and they don't respond to what you want either. I mean, the whole point is that. I think this is such a sign of kind of weak obedience from, and I will say, I mean, I know Eugene pretty well. He seems to me a little bit, I haven't talked to him about this. In the statement, he said, unanimous decision. I would not be surprised if he was quite pressured to do this by the White House Correspondents Association is made up of representatives from kind of every network, every wire service by outlets who feel under greater pressure than I think he would personally. But it's not his personal choice. I think it is a scholarship dinner.

Kara Swisher: Yes, that is true.

Jen Psaki: But what you're doing here, there's a comedian at almost all of these dinners. Right. The comedian typically, even when there's a president with less fodder than Trump, spends most of their time making fun of the sitting president because that's the whole point. There's plenty of easy fodder about Democrats right now. I mean, Chuck Schumer. Hello. There's a few jokes about you and a couple of other people. Right. But what this is doing is this is agreeing to the terms he wants at a dinner that is supposed to be about preserving the value of the freedom and independence of the press.

Kara Swisher: And speech.

Jen Psaki: And speech. And you are obeying in advance about something so stupid, you know?

Kara Swisher: Yeah, that's the thing. It's so stupid. I've never been happy about that dinner, I have to tell you. I've always felt it was too jocular. I thought it was too, like, hanging out with your sources. And I wasn't a political reporter, but I was like, oof, this is a little awkward. When you were dealing, though, with the White House correspondents, they decided where to sit, right, where everybody sits.

Jen Psaki: In the briefing room.

Kara Swisher: In the briefing room. And now the Trump administration is taking control of that. They took control of who could be there, and they knocked AP out for not saying Gulf of America and saying Gulf of Mexico. Again, it's a matter of free speech, as Julia Pace has said, who runs AP. Did you ever imagine pushing these people, that you could push these people around like this? Because it certainly looks like it was possible for you to do that. What was your relationship with them?

Jen Psaki: Well, you could, and we kind of, you know, they would do sternly worded letters and you would ignore them. You know, I mean, it's not, I think it's sort of a bit of an outdated system in some ways, in many ways. The idea of it is a good idea, right? It just needs to be modernized, which is like a bunch of reporters who cover the White House speaking as a group about issues and not as individual organizations. And that's a good thing. But, you know, it's what they choose to fight about. And when I was there, sometimes they would write these sternly worded letters about, like, we need a formal press conference in the East Wing. And you're like, really? That's what you're going to write your sternly worded letter about? And you ignored it. I mean, you're going to do one or you're not. I don't, you know, it's like...

Kara Swisher: I'm seeing your face going, oh, God, this letter.

Jen Psaki: But the other thing is that you also work with the White House Correspondents Association on a variety of things that can be useful, like the president's going to a war zone. You can't announce that in advance. We need a small pool of reporters on the plane to travel with the president. And you work with them on that. You work with them on planning foreign trips to making sure and fighting for access and things like that. So there are a lot of constructive reasons for having an organization that you can kind of work with as a representation. But I think some of this stuff is just, it's like a misguided.

Kara Swisher: So why shouldn't they just, so one of the ideas is they band together and they just leave the room like and then it left to like the I don't know Newsmax people like whatever. Is that a bad thing? Like just say you know what? Because by staying there you give it credibility this nonsense. Or do you have to just live by the rules they've decided now, live in their oxygen universe? Is there any possibility? They won't do this because corporate media won't do it. But is there any choice here but to dance to his tune?

Jen Psaki: Well, I think it would be a mistake for them to leave the room. Because I think they leave the room. Hard to explain to the public that all of these organizations who are giving them any information from inside the White House are all biased toward Trump, right? So they are, this is not their responsibility.

Kara Swisher: Oh, maybe it is part of their responsibility, but they're playing a public service role by still being there, I think, and by being present in the room. Even if they're not asked questions, even if they can't, they don't have any access?

Jen Psaki: Well, they ask questions in the briefing, right? You know, the briefing and the outdated nature of that is another topic. You know, the nature of the pool is like, there's no precedent for this, right? So there's no, just like many things Trump does, it's almost like the playbook, the system is not prepared to respond to it. So this is a moment for, I think, them and as an association or as media outlets to decide, how are we going to respond? Maybe Trump's not the last version of this, right?

Kara Swisher: I think you should plan for him not being the last version of this. And what does that look like?

Jen Psaki: Well, you just said very quickly, like, it's another topic. You shouldn't have briefings. I think they're stupid.

Kara Swisher: No, no, no, no, no. You shouldn't have briefings. But absolutely. For a number of reasons. I mean, one of them is it's, I mean, freedom of press, having the freedom of press there, that sends a message to the world. You can't go into other countries and be like, freedom of press, to talk to real reporters and then not do it yourself. It also pushes the system internally to get answers. It's very efficient. All of those things. What I mean is there are ways that the, you know, in the briefing room, it's a little different now, but in the briefing room still, it's dominated by a handful of outlets. And a handful of outlets are not what the majority of the public consumes. And so there are some outdated aspects of it.

Jen Psaki: Yeah, yeah. I was sort of like, when she was like, let's let in others. I'm like, yeah, let's let in. I want to go.

Kara Swisher: Oh, yeah, yeah. So those things, the thing, the problem is those things are good things. Like Sean Spicer did a lot of crazy things. I can only think of Melissa McCarthy. But he did have a screen where he had regional reporters at times. I think that's a good thing. There are things that need to be modernized about that. But what they've done now is they've essentially let in state-run media to kind of be the dominant sources of information in the pool. And that's a problem.

Jen Psaki: Well, why wouldn't they do that? I mean, to me, being angry about it is sort of like, oh, can you? Someone was like, can you believe they did it? I'm like, yeah, I can believe it. Once again, I can believe that they would put state-run media in there. Why wouldn't they? That's good for them. Like, they'll do whatever is good for them. I don't know if we have any choice in there, honestly, to leave or go.

Kara Swisher: Yes. And historically, Democratic and Republican presidents have not done that. There's all sorts of things to criticize about every administration in terms of the ones, including the ones I worked in, about how they dealt with the press. I'm not suggesting that. But there were briefings done. There was, most of the time, accurate information. There wasn't intentional misleading most of the time. There are exceptions, right? This is a whole different thing. And the system and the press corps is not prepared for it.

Kara Swisher: Well, Trump is innovative, if anything, somewhat innovative in a very terrible way. I guess you could call it that.

Jen Psaki: Call it that.

Kara Swisher: Yeah. Anyway, let me ask you one more question because you were there. How would you have changed if you were still there, if you were not working for Trump but a Democratic? What would you have taken from what they've done here and said, OK, good idea, this not so much? How would you modernize it? Give me two things.

Jen Psaki: Sure. I would have done, actually, truthfully, if Hillary Clinton had won, I was the communications director for Obama, we would have recommended they change the briefing. And when I came in, and I'll come back to that in a second, when I came in and I was Biden's press secretary four years later, because we were following four years of them yelling at reporters and demonizing the media and not doing regular briefings, we felt like we had to return to some sort of normalcy to send the message, right?

Jen Psaki: But if it had been Hillary Clinton, I would have said, do two or three briefings a week. Include some sort of rotation of regional reporters or other outlets, either in the room or on a screen. You can easily answer questions to people who are on a screen. The other days, maybe do them off camera because people can still get information. But there's something very performative about the briefing room and television.

Kara Swisher: I realize I'm currently a host of a TV show. Yeah, I get it.

Jen Psaki: There's something very performative about the briefing room and television. You and Ducey.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, we got it.

Jen Psaki: I mean, but, you know, yes, you can do that. Give people the clips they want and whatever. But, like, two days, do a gaggle. We call it a gaggle. You do them on planes at the State Department. But you're in your—well, it's hard because there's too many people usually. But, like, yes, back in the day, you used to do gaggles in your office. People still ask tough questions. You still have to answer them. It's not as performative and it's not as constructive to ask the question 17 times because somebody's already asked the question. Those are a couple of the things I would do.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I agree with you on the screens. You could have people from across the country.

[Break]

Kara Swisher: Anyway, one more quick break and we'll be back for wins and fails.

[Break]

Kara Swisher: Okay, Jen, let's hear some wins and fails. I'll go first. My fail of the week are these continuing attacks on these students at colleges. They should be able to say what they want anytime they want and even criticize the United States and things. I don't even agree with some of them. And I really find it a fail that people are not more upset about this, that students are targeted just because of things they say. Same thing with Elon Musk's attacks on people who don't like Teslas. If you don't like a Tesla, you should be able to say you don't like it. Because if you don't like Elon Musk, you should be able to say you don't like Elon Musk. And he shouldn't have to spin a conspiracy theory about it because he's sad. And one of the things that I've always noticed about this group of people, as I've said on your show and many other shows, every accusation is a confession with these people. Like everything they accuse people of, they're doing themselves. And so I find it really... these are students that are here. We're supposed to be an open society. If they want to dislike us, come here and dislike us. That's fine, too. In fact, it makes us stronger. Makes us love our country more.

I think a win is, I'm going to give it to Lisa Murkowski. Actually, both Republican senators, Dan Sullivan and the other. And they're really doing different tactics to push back on Trump. I would say I prefer Lisa Murkowski's efforts more. She's in a safer position now that she's shown she's got the grit to stick in there. And she has the political capital to do that. But I do think there should be more. You see Senator Lankford doing the same thing and calling for a look into SignalGate. It would be really nice to see more of these Republican senators find their set. And of course, it's a woman who's doing it first. And I do think that's something to look up to, and we should praise those efforts when they're done by the Republican Party. Because I do think it's, as much as we talk about the lack of spine for the Republicans, I think it's super, super hard to be in that situation if you want to have a role in government.

And I'm going to add in a last one from International. Marine Le Pen, barred from the presidential run after embezzlement ruling, is really something. It shows there are consequences. Now, there are other leaders now who have taken her place, so it's not going to really slow them down. But I do think that just shows that other countries know how to handle problems of their elected officials and are much more fair about it. Of course, there's going to be a whole conspiracy theory around her. But nonetheless, I thought that was something surprising for me. I didn't even know that was coming. So your turn.

Jen Psaki: I didn't either on Marine Le Pen. Okay, wins. I'm going to say, as much as I've said repeatedly that there are not enough Democrats out there and more need to be out there, I am delighted by the reemergence of Tim Walz, who I think was like locked in a closet somewhere during the 2024 or most of the election after he became the running mate. He kind of... I love his imperfect, rough around the edges answers to things. He had this amazing moment a couple days ago where he talked about the benefits of the Department of Education and what it actually does for people. He was asked a question about Title I by a student at a Title I school. I think this is one of those bureaucratic things most people don't know how to talk about, and I think a lot of parents would actually care if they knew. I loved that. I love the re-emergence of him.

I'm going to give a tie. The other person that I have, I didn't... I knew who he was, but I didn't really pay attention to what he had to say, but I feel like has become this emerging great speaker and voice in the Democratic Party is Greg Casar, who is the—

Kara Swisher: Oh, I don't know this. Explain.

Jen Psaki: He is the chairman of the Progressive Caucus, but he is a person who speaks in plain English about how things impact people. And I've had him on the show a couple times. He's been at a couple of these rallies. It's always exciting when you see people you didn't really know before and you're like, that person makes sense. So that's exciting to me.

I'm going to say my loss, I'm just going to stay in the political space, in the blueprint theme, since nobody knows what the blueprint is, I'm going to tell you. I have been consistently disappointed with Chuck Schumer, which I have openly talked about.

Kara Swisher: Me too.

Jen Psaki: I think we can move on from the debacle of the funding debate or funding agreement for a moment. But here's what is disappointing. It doesn't seem clear that any lessons have been learned because the Democrats have been on recess. There is a debate coming up about extending high-end tax cuts, which will happen in all likelihood. But this is a winning issue. It could be something you could equip people to go out to districts and hold town halls and meetings and be aligned. I'm obsessed with Social Security and how this is something that some Democrats have effectively talked about. But the fact is, you have the Commerce Secretary saying his mother, his mother-in-law... was it his mother-in-law?

Kara Swisher: Oh, whatever. He's such a clown. Wouldn't care. No, he said, did you see this?

Jen Psaki: Yes, I did.

Kara Swisher: Wouldn't care if her Social Security check got a week late. It's because her son's a billionaire, you imbecile. Right.

Jen Psaki: Also, like, that should be in ads everywhere. Like, I know about it, but why isn't it everywhere? So I'm not putting all the blame on him, but he's a Democratic leader. We can move on from the funding debate. Let's learn some lessons.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I would agree. I would dump him. I think he should. Just so you know, for people who don't know, Representative Casar is from Austin, obviously. He also includes Elon Musk's largest factory. And he is terrific. He's really terrific. And he's been attacking Musk, among others. And before Musk became Musk, he had a little tangle with him.

Jen Psaki: He did.

Kara Swisher: And he's also saying, let's stop with the purity tests and stop being so... So he's very, he's got the right message. And it's really interesting. And it's an interesting place he's from because he's from Texas, although Austin is not really Texas, is it? In any case, those are good ones. See, that wasn't hard.

Jen Psaki: See, you did it.

Kara Swisher: No, I know. You have still not told a dirty joke, but let me have a comic come on and talk a little bit. We want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business, tech, or whatever's on your mind. Go to nymag.com slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 855-51-PIVOT.

Elsewhere in the Kara Swisher universe, I talked to comedian Michelle Buteau on On with Kara Swisher this week. Let's listen to a clip.

[Clip plays]

Michelle Buteau (in clip): I'm not working from a place of fear. Fuck that. No, no. Edit yourself. No, no. So many people edit themselves and they do what they think they should be doing. And then they beat themselves up when it doesn't go through, when it doesn't get a second season or get greenlit. And it's just like, no, I need to sleep at night. And if I'm not doing what I know I need to do, what my intuition tells me I need to do, then I'm not going to sleep. So no, working from a place of fear is, if you're an artist, like, get over that shit real quick.

[Clip ends]

Kara Swisher: Anyway, she was great. I think comics are doing some of the most interesting work right now, don't you? Like, I have a comic on every eight weeks at least, because I think they are some of the smartest people talking about politics right now and have fearlessness.

Jen Psaki: Yes, we do too. We like to have comics on as well, because I think they can talk about things happening in a way that breaks through and is real. As she said, it's a little bit more fearless because you want to be funny.

Kara Swisher: Right, right. I'm going to try to get Amber Ruffin to come on and do her set.

Jen Psaki: Good. Yeah, yeah.

Kara Swisher: So no jokes from you then.

Jen Psaki: No jokes from you.

Kara Swisher: All right, I'll do one. Why do melons have weddings?

Jen Psaki: Why?

Kara Swisher: They cantaloupe.

Jen Psaki: Okay.

Kara Swisher: All right, one more. Here's a dirtier one.

Jen Psaki: Okay, dirty.

Kara Swisher: That wasn't even a dirty joke. Care if I knew it was like a, you know.

Jen Psaki: All right, let me do a penis one then. Why did the sperm cross the road?

Kara Swisher: Why?

Jen Psaki: Because I put on the wrong sock this morning.

Kara Swisher: Okay. Oh, but I don't even know what that means.

Jen Psaki: We're here for it. Someone's going to write to you and give their analysis.

Kara Swisher: I love it. Right. Exactly. I need an older son to give me dirty jokes. I know. Okay. That's the show. Thank you so much, Jen. Jen is the host of MSNBC's Inside with Jen Psaki, Sundays at 12 p.m. ET, and Mondays at 8 p.m. ET. Come this spring, she'll be making the move to MSNBC's Primetime as the host of the 9 p.m. ET hour, Tuesdays through Fridays, so Jen Psaki everywhere. She's going to be surrounding you.

Jen Psaki: You're everywhere, Kara. I'm not on five nights a week on Primetime.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, thanks. I knew you'd be good at this, and you are indeed. Thanks for listening to Pivot. Be sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. We'll be back on Friday. I will read this out, but thank you, Jen, so much.

Jen Psaki: Thank you. Great to be with you.

Kara Swisher: Today's show was produced by Lara Naiman, Zoe Marcus, and Taylor Griffin. Ernie Enderdot engineered this episode. Julian Villard edited the video. Nishat Kurwa is Vox Media's executive producer of audio. Make sure you subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts. Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media. You can subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com slash pod. We'll be back later this week for another guest host. I'm not saying who it is. And another breakdown of all things tech and business. But Jen, again, thank you so much.

Jen Psaki: Thank you. Next guest host better bring dirty jokes. Give them a heads up.