Hurricane Helene Aftermath, Trump’s Federal Election Case, and OpenAI’s Valuation

Kara Swisher: [Intro music fades] Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher. And Scott, I'm sorry for being late to our taping today. I apologize.

Scott Galloway: So you want me to ask why, and then you get to name drop.

Kara Swisher: No, you don't. You don't have to. I'm just going to—you don't have to name drop. I apologize. I was taping another thing, and I'm late to you.

Scott Galloway: But you're always late, but not this late.

Kara Swisher: Oh, that's a very sincere apology.

Scott Galloway: I want to apologize, and you're always late.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, thank you for that. That was very meaningful and very heartfelt.

Scott Galloway: Well, you flex and you do exercises. People don't know, before you start the show, Scott always does like a manly exercise thing for all of us. It's very exciting for the team.

Kara Swisher: I didn't know you could see that.

Scott Galloway: Oh, yeah.

Kara Swisher: That's funny. The next thing I'm going to find out, I have an OnlyFans account that I didn't know about.

Scott Galloway: I bet you can make some dough doing that. So where are you today? I just got back from San Francisco in Toronto.

Kara Swisher: Oh, you're back. I was traveling.

Scott Galloway: Oh, God. Yeah, I'm back.

Kara Swisher: You must travel at night. You're always not working.

Scott Galloway: I do. I go to—I'm open at O Dark 100 hours tomorrow. I take the Paddington train, which I love, or the Paddington Express, Heathrow Express, which is fantastic. I love infrastructure. That's one thing I love about a government that spends too much money on taxes at a fair amount. I love the infrastructure that comes from that. And then I go to L.A. for my friends Eddie Blau and David Frey's 50th birthdays, which I'm super excited about. I'm going to see my good friends, Kings, Browdy, Flesh, all our fraternity friends and all their kids. And then I'm in L.A. I don't know if you heard, but I sold an original scripted drama to Netflix.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, that's why I was waiting for you to go. So you're going to do a development meeting?

Scott Galloway: No, I'm in a writer's room. I don't even know what that means. It's like, do we have a bunch of people from Harvard in a room and like Triumph the Spirock? There's snacks. There's snacks. I don't know what that means. I'm super excited. I'm just going to go—well, I can't wait. I just hope that someone who's in the union is there. And I'm just going to keep going, "Well, A.I. says." I can't wait to just say that.

Kara Swisher: Oh, you have to do that. Every 15 seconds.

Scott Galloway: "Let me consult Claude."

Kara Swisher: What?

Scott Galloway: "Let me consult Claude. We're having trouble with this dialogue? Let me see what Claude says."

Kara Swisher: Will you do that? I'll pay you $5 to do that.

Scott Galloway: There you go. And then I go back to New York. I'm hanging there for a while, which I'm really excited about.

Kara Swisher: You and I are going to hang out. We're doing a fancy party with Joanna Coles or something?

Scott Galloway: No, we're doing an interview.

Kara Swisher: Who are we interviewing?

Scott Galloway: She's interviewing us about our deep and abiding relationship.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, there you go. Yeah, it's going to be good. Actually, I went to—I did a lot of events, including one where everybody asked me about you, Scott.

Scott Galloway: I appreciate that.

Kara Swisher: In Toronto. Canadians love us, let me just say.

Scott Galloway: Oh, you're in Toronto.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I was.

Scott Galloway: It's such a nice city, isn't it?

Kara Swisher: It is. It really is. I was there for a New York minute.

Scott Galloway: Yeah.

Kara Swisher: But I was actually mostly in San Francisco. I interviewed the four people running for mayor of San Francisco, which was interesting. It was interesting for me. And I interviewed Yuval Harari, who has a new book out about AI. He wrote *Sapiens*. He's scary. I don't like listening to him about AI.

Scott Galloway: He's scared of it?

Kara Swisher: Yeah, he's scared of it. A little bit scared of it. But he was great. It was a lot about historical stuff though. This was the history of information system. He's a historian by training, so it was really fascinating. Did you know what the best-selling book of the Gutenberg age was? It was not science. It took 200 years for science books to really get out there. It was a thing called *The Hammer of Witches*. And it was a book about how to kill witches. And it was the best, written by a crazy person named Heimrich. I can't remember his last name, but everything in it resonates today. It was the very first QAnon document. And it was because of the Gutenberg printing press. That's what he was making the links between today's modern internet. Everything was conspiracy theories when printing press started. And we don't remember that. And people died—10,000 people were killed in these witch hunts because of this book. Anyway, just kind of interesting.

Scott Galloway: Did you read *Sapiens*?

Kara Swisher: I did. I had to because all the tech bros loved it. I liked it. I think it's outstanding.

Scott Galloway: It is. I had taken a lot of those courses in college. And so it was amazing when I would go around because all the tech bros loved it. They're like, "Did you know this about development of humanity?" I go, "I did. I took a college course." They hadn't taken history or anthropology or sociology, which was interesting. But I thought he pulled it together beautifully. I was glad they read it. He's an impressive guy.

Kara Swisher: He is. He's great. He's terrific. Anyway.

Scott Galloway: Do you want to hear my Toronto story? But I'm back now.

Kara Swisher: Sure. Go ahead.

Scott Galloway: So every year, my father, until recently, got something off his bucket list. And every year, he picked the same thing. He wanted to go to Toronto to see opening night at the Air Canada Center of the Leafs versus the Habs, being the Montreal Canadiens. And for some reason, they have bagpipers at opening night of the Leafs, and they come out on the ice, and my dad just melts down and cries for some reason. Like, didn't cry when he left me and my mom, but he cries when bagpipers come out on ice.

Kara Swisher: Well, bagpipers are very sad.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, it is very sad. And he does the same thing. And because he doesn't remember—he's done it every goddamn year—he goes, "I got to take you somewhere special." And we get in a cab and we go to this place and we walk down the street and he's like, grabs my hand. He's like, "Oh, yeah, just wait." And he points to this Bragtag apartment building. He goes, "Look up three floors, see the air conditioner right there." And he's like, "That's what you were conceived." And then waits for my reaction. I'm like, "I know. We've done this every year for five years and it's still awkward."

Kara Swisher: Have you done it this year?

Scott Galloway: No, he hasn't been able to travel for years. But he loves—I can take you.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, that goes from awkward to worse. I do love Toronto, though. I go to Toronto with you. It's a great city.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, all right. Well, they want us to come back there and do stuff. And I also went to Berkeley Haas School. They really want us to go there.

Kara Swisher: Oh, how was that?

Scott Galloway: Yes. They thanked you for your money. They thanked you for your money. It was great. The students were fantastic. I had a full house talk and stuff, but they were like, "When are we going to have Scott and Kara together here?" I said, "Well, Moneybags and I will come next year."

Kara Swisher: Oh, Haas. It's changed my life. It's a business school. Generally speaking, this is very reductive. One of the nice things about Haas is that I think as someone who knows a lot of people in and around the business community, it attracts nice kids.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, very nice kids. Great. They really try and find kids who are humble, who maybe come from less economically advantageous backgrounds, who just kind of are crazy smart. And every time I go there, I'm just struck at how the University of California manages and Berkeley manages to attract a really neat kid. They were. They want to do good. There was very little douchebaggery, none whatsoever. Really lovely kids. Great questions. They're more—I think they're less like on the make from other business schools, if that makes sense.

Kara Swisher: You mean like a school that rhymes with Stanford?

Scott Galloway: Yeah, that one. But I think it's—I had a lovely time with these students, but they love you, Scott Galloway, I'll tell you that.

Kara Swisher: I appreciate that. Thanks for saying that. Yeah. We'll have to go there and do some. Change my life. State-sponsored education. Change my life. California taxpayers. And they certainly are appreciative. The money that you've given is being split, right, between?

Scott Galloway: I gave—it's a joint program. Thank you for asking. It's a joint program between UCLA and Berkeley to focus on continuing education, which is a fancy way of saying vocational programming. I wanted my money to go to something where there was no admissions. Anyone could just show up and say, "I want to improve my life." And it would be free and it would be focused on jobs in the real economy: nursing, cybersecurity, construction. And it's the first of its kind in that the Chancellors—Chancellor Block and now Chancellor Lyons, it was Chancellor Christ—came together to do a joint program. It took us two years to figure it out, but I'm just super—it's like an overdue nod to California taxpayers who put me in the seat.

Kara Swisher: So has it started?

Scott Galloway: We're admitting our first class of like 120 or 200 kids to the continuing education programs this year. But I love it because it's super unsexy and it has the things I want. I want free and I want it to be accessible and I want it to be focused on—I don't want to say young men, but young adults who aren't cut out for a traditional four-year liberal arts degree.

Kara Swisher: No, we should do—let's do an event at both places where I'll interview you about this. How about that? We'll do that. We'll talk about it. They're both—have you spent much time at UCLA?

Scott Galloway: I have. I love it. It's beautiful. I mean, they're both just—you walk around campus. Of course, I took my sons there and they're both like, "I want to go to UCLA." And I'm like, "Well, just so you know, you're not getting in because I don't know if you've heard this. It's hard." You feel like it's 155,000 applications a year now, admissions rate of 9%. And I do begrudgingly respect this. Both chancellors told me on the eve of my actual donation, they said, "We just need to be straight with you. Your kids aren't getting in." It's actually more difficult now for the children of donors to get in.

Kara Swisher: Yep, it is. And California just said there can't be legacy for the private schools. Yeah, we'll talk about that in a minute. Anyway, they love you there.

Scott Galloway: Thanks for saying that. It was a great thing.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, today there's a lot we're going to talk about. Political and economic impacts of Hurricane Helene. New evidence in the federal election case from Donald Trump—really disturbing evidence, actually, and not that it'll matter. And our listener question this week comes from someone who wants dating advice from me and Scott.

Scott Galloway: That's not a good idea. Just get her drunk. Like, ask her—ask her—

Kara Swisher: No, no, no, no, no, no.

Scott Galloway: It's easy. Let's wait. Let's wait. Ask her if she has—what the relationship is like with her father. If she says anything positive, move along.

Kara Swisher: Move along. Okay. All right. First, the biggest VC deal ever. Former nonprofit entity, OpenAI—and I say former—just pulled in $6.6 billion in its latest fundraising round, bringing in a valuation of $157 billion. Before this funding deal came through, OpenAI reportedly expected about $5 billion in losses a year on $3.7 billion in revenue. OpenAI is currently a capped profit company under the terms of this new investment round. It has two years to fully transform into a for-profit business, or its funding will convert to debt and obviously transform. We talked about this a lot last week. In fact, they wrote me and said, "Just make sure Scott sees this." They seem to like what you had to say. What does it mean for the rest of the AI market? I mean, it's sort of winners and losers at this point, right? This is a lot of money.

Scott Galloway: The new Wintel is OpenVIDIA. OpenAI and NVIDIA control—

Kara Swisher: OpenVIDIA. Oh, I like that.

Scott Galloway: They control 70 and 92% of their markets respectively. Just as technologies have a zero to 60 time much faster now. The zero to duopoly or monopoly is happening. And I'm not sure, but I think NVIDIA may have even invested in this round. The thing that struck me about this round as someone who does these types of investments is obviously there were so many people looking to crowd into this round. A couple of things. So many people are trying to get into this round that the leads on it and the bigger investors, including Thrive, were able to create essentially different terms or a different class of stock. They have investment rights or pro rata rights that the other investors in the same round don't have. And that's really non-kosher and not cool because the whole idea of an investment in a round is that you're all taking a similar risk. So when some investors get most favored nation status—in other words, they get better terms—that's really unusual. What an investor will ask you when you're raising money is, "Am I getting the same terms as every investor?" Because they don't want to find out other investors were getting all sorts of additional sweeteners and thereby lowering the valuation, and they were the dumb money following the people who got a better deal. And these guys were able to pull that off.

Kara Swisher: Just to be clear, that's Joshua Kushner, who is the brother of the smart one.

Scott Galloway: I would call him the smart one. Who's an outstanding VC in his own right.

Kara Swisher: He is indeed. He absolutely is. An impressive, lovely guy. Nice guy. He's the Kushner we like. The other one, not so much.

Scott Galloway: You know what? The other one was my student, and I think he's actually a really nice kid. And also, just to be fair, I don't think he gets enough credit for the Abraham Accords. I think that was actually a pretty bright spot in the Trump administration. Anyways, the other observation is that companies now—you just want to have a company worth $150 billion still private. But what's happened is because there's so much capital now in the private markets, and these guys look at Google and they look at Meta and think, as VCs, "Why did we let Main Street get all of this upside? We'll just keep it private longer." And the employees and the CEO like it because they can have additional compensation. They can sell their shares. They don't have to do these pesky things called earnings and analyst calls. So unfortunately, a lot of the upside has been transferred from retail investors to private institutional investors. You never would have had a company at $150 billion raising $6 billion in the private markets. And the bad news is that again, it's another transfer of wealth from the people who are already wealthy. Google and Meta have made a lot of middle class people a lot of money. But where do you—I'll give you an example, Airbnb. Airbnb is an amazing company. Amazing. Any retail investor who bought it on the first trading day of the IPO has lost money. Because what IPOs are becoming to a certain extent is the last stop when all the juice has been squeezed. When everyone around the table goes, "You know what? No one's going to pay a higher price. I know. Let's go to stupid retail investors," as opposed to a financing event. Anyway, thank you for my TED talk.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I would agree. The rich get richer. I think that's what you're essentially saying. So what does it mean for the rest of the market? I think it means that they're going to pull ahead, right? They now have the advantages they need to move forward. I'm fascinated by AI. I had an MRI. I uploaded my MRI to see what they suggest, what kind of exercises I should do. I uploaded—I just had blood and urine tests done, and I uploaded the results to say, "How should I change my diet and my lifestyle?" I mean, I am just quite frankly just fucking fascinated by AI right now. And I think it's remarkable.

Scott Galloway: You're asking all the questions. Scott's asking all the questions. You know what I did? I uploaded a bunch of our notes and our scripts. And I said, "Please put together a script for this week based on current events in tech and business." And then I went over to another and I said, "Try and attach a voice on it." I'm trying to basically replicate Pivot and see how close we can get.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, we've seen some bad versions of it.

Scott Galloway: Oh, it's not. It's still awkward. The inflection, the humor, it's still very anodyne. But it really just starts to blow your mind.

Kara Swisher: But look. It does. Someone when I was with uploaded something like that, your stuff, and asked what she would ask Kara Swisher. And it was a dick joke. "What do lesbians do when they have sex?" I think that was what came out of the air.

Scott Galloway: That's the answer there. Does it involve Riverdale or strap-ons?

Kara Swisher: Okay. Or movies about German Shepherds?

Scott Galloway: Nonetheless, that's what it knows of you.

Kara Swisher: Does someone scream out, "Subaru! Subaru!" And it is surprisingly accurate.

Scott Galloway: That was good.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, we're moving on. We're moving on. I got to get out of this.

Scott Galloway: That was good.

Kara Swisher: All right. Another story. Tesla stock was down 4% after posting its third quarter production deliveries report on Wednesday. The company's global sales of cars and trucks rose a little bit but fell short of Wall Street expectations. It was 6.4%. Deliveries increased by 28,000 compared to the same quarter last year. They've been cutting prices, too. Plans to unveil its robo-taxi at a much-anticipated marketing event, pretending they're in the robo-taxi business. Meanwhile, Waymo is all over the streets of San Francisco and other states. I don't know if demand's coming back. I just think they're just a declining market share, right? Because there's competitors, essentially. So I'm sick of talking about Elon. Let's go back to lesbians.

Scott Galloway: So I saw this data out of the UK, which I think you'll find interesting. Divorce rates among gay men, 24%. Divorce rates in heteronormative marriages, 44% to 48%. The data was unclear. Divorce rates among gay couples, lesbian couples, guess what it is?

Kara Swisher: 5%?

Scott Galloway: 72%.

Kara Swisher: Whoa, really? Interesting.

Scott Galloway: So I thought it was fascinating. As you know, I'm writing a book on masculinity, and I wanted to understand more about what happens when a man after—

Kara Swisher: Well, I got a lesbian divorce, but go ahead.

Scott Galloway: After a divorce, men are four times as likely to kill themselves. In the few years after divorce, a man becomes eight times more likely to kill himself. Anyways, but so I started trying to figure out what factors bring divorce energy to a divorce. And it's mostly money. But also I looked at this data and I said, "Do women bring divorce energy?" And you can't make that assumption from the 24 to the 48, from the gay men to the heteronormative, because I think what's happened—and there's a lot of evidence of this, I find this shit fascinating. I think you will too. As women make more money, the ascent or the slope of the increase in their earnings has not been matched by the increase in domestic responsibilities that the male partner has taken on. In some marriages on a lot of levels day to day for a lot of women, it's like, "Okay, I'm making as much or more money than you now. I'm as good a provider. And quite frankly, you're not picking up the slack. This is just too fucking much for me." And someone told me that. And I was like, that resonates. But where it falls down is that once you go to two women, the divorce energy is really, really high. What are your thoughts as a lesbian?

Kara Swisher: Oh, wow. Well, today is my fourth anniversary with Amanda. So happy anniversary, honey. It happens to be today.

Scott Galloway: Anecdotally, does that feel right or wrong?

Kara Swisher: I don't know. Some of them have been together long. Some have been—I think women are just—I think if they're unhappy, they move along and they don't like—it's easier for a man to stay in an unhappy marriage than a woman, I would imagine, right? Or in the case of gay men, they are much looser around their standards with each other, right? They have a little more leeway.

Scott Galloway: You mean they get it? They invite in third parties? Whatever. They totally get it. That's my experience with gay men is that they're more loose in their standards. And I'm not judging their standards. It's just that they don't get all twisted as much as straight couples do.

Kara Swisher: In the case of lesbians, I don't know this.

Scott Galloway: When you say twisted, you mean about the notion of them having sex outside of the partnership?

Kara Swisher: Yeah.

Scott Galloway: Like it's a little less—the expectations are lower, I guess. And again, I don't judge the expectations. I think that straight people are really in a vice of expectation almost constantly because of movies, because of—you know, movies do a number on you people.

Kara Swisher: A vice of expectation. Kara Swisher, you are good. You have a good turn of phrase. I like that.

Scott Galloway: Thank you. A vice of expectation. You may use it. But I think they just—I used to watch all these movies about straight people and the marriages. I'm actually—I just watched *Nobody Wants This* on Netflix, which is Adam Brody and Kristen—what's her name?

Kara Swisher: Oh, she's fantastic. She was in *Frozen*.

Scott Galloway: And it's about dating in Los Angeles. And I actually like it because it's honest about straight people dating a little bit more than—

Kara Swisher: What were the takeaways? I'm fascinated by dating. I just—that people have these romantic ideas born by Hollywood.

Scott Galloway: Oh.

Kara Swisher: You know what I mean? Come true. It's Kristen Bell.

Scott Galloway: Bell, yes.

Kara Swisher: Oh, yeah, she's wonderful. It's a big hit. It's a huge hit right now, although I don't understand how someone could live in Los Angeles and not know what the word "shiksa" is as a Christian or whatever. Oh, she's great. She's great. It's a really interesting and hard look at dating, but it's good, actually. But it's also delightful and they're beautiful people, so it's very attractive.

Scott Galloway: You want to hear my Kristen Bell story?

Kara Swisher: Okay, go ahead.

Scott Galloway: You don't, but you'll see a thing. We're way away from Tesla.

Kara Swisher: Go ahead, yes, go ahead. Tesla, what the—okay, he sucks, Tesla, blah, blah, blah. The company's overvalued, boom, we're done with Tesla. All right, so I went on Dax Shepard, *Armchair Expert*, which is like one of the 10 biggest podcasts in the world.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, he does. And he and his co-host—I'm blanking on a name—super lovely, super nice. He and I were talking about working out and relationships, and we really hit it off, and he sent me a text message. I'm like, "Oh, my God, I'm friends with Dax Shepard." And my producer said, "We've got to get Dax on our podcast," and he agreed. And then that morning, I fucked up, as I do often, and I forgot that my kid had a spring concert and I had to cancel on Dax like two or three hours before he was due. And he wrote back, "Understood, but I need you to know I'm not going to do this again. I'm out." This is totally inappropriate, which I very much respect. And I'm so bummed and I was too ashamed to like reach out and apologize. Anyways, Dax, I'm sorry. I still want to be friends.

Kara Swisher: Why don't you text him back?

Scott Galloway: Oh my God, text him back.

Kara Swisher: I just blew it. I was just embarrassed.

Scott Galloway: Oh, come on. Say Kara made me text you back.

Kara Swisher: I'm in the vice of expectations of heteronormative male friendship. Write him back. What is wrong with you?

Scott Galloway: I don't know. Oh, my God. I don't know what's wrong with me.

Kara Swisher: You know what you—you know what it is?

Scott Galloway: At me. Yes. Bad dad and bad friend in one swoop.

Kara Swisher: You know what the problem is? I'm going to bring it back to Elon for one second. Puffery. Corporate puffery.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, he just got off. Embarrassment.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, yeah. Puffery. Tax. Let me back in. I'll be at the Beverly Hills Hotel for four or five nights.

Scott Galloway: Well, that's because you're on different shelves. And you—he's on a higher shelf than you, and you canceled on him. And if someone on a lower shelf cannot cancel on a higher shelf person, it's just—and he's like, "What the fuck?" I'm a higher shelf person.

Kara Swisher: A higher shelf? From a podcast point of view, right?

Scott Galloway: I buy it. Dax is higher shelf. From a podcast point of view. But hold on. But other than having a bigger podcast, being much more handsome and much more talented and wealthier than me, how is he higher shelf? How is he higher shelf? He just was like, "You're wasting my time."

Kara Swisher: Dax on a shelf? Elf on a shelf? Dax on a shelf?

Scott Galloway: Yeah. I didn't handle that well, Kara.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I think you need to do this. We'll make a video for Dax Shepard. Look into the camera right now and say, "Dax, I am so sorry."

Scott Galloway: All right, hold on. Ready? Dax, I am so sorry. Boom!

Kara Swisher: That's what you call relationship repair. Evolve man in touch with his feelings. None of that lesbian divorce right over here.

Scott Galloway: All right, okay. All right. All right. Should we talk about Tesla?

Kara Swisher: Should we talk about Tesla? No, no. I was just going to say, actually, he did. A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Tesla and Musk of defrauding shareholders. The suit was sent around Musk's claim that Tesla's autopilot and full self-driving technology could drive safer than humans. The judge said the claims amounted to corporate puffery. I don't care about Elon. What is corporate puffery? That's what I want to know.

Scott Galloway: Exaggeration, bullshit, spin, whatever these companies.

Kara Swisher: Should he get off for this? He was pretty insistent. You know what? At some point, constant puffery becomes like small case fraud. I don't know. When does it cross the line? But trying to predict when a technology is going to arrive, I can see him saying, "Look, I generally was hoping and thought it would arrive."

Scott Galloway: The most interesting thing I think about Tesla right now is that we talk too much about Tesla. The auto company that's gotten it right for the last two or three years, it's not Tesla. It's Toyota. Because the biggest thing in auto over the last two years is a recognition by the public that it's not about EVs, it's about hybrids. And EV sales were up single digits, and hybrid sales were up hugely double digits. And who did not get seduced by EVs, unlike Ford and General Motors, hoping to be more Tesla-like? Toyota. And Kia. Is that right?

Scott Galloway: Kia has. I have a Kia hybrid. But basically, consumers are waking up to the fact, let me get this. I get the benefits of electric without the need for charge stations, and I get at a lower cost. It's called hybrids. I think hybrids are, quite frankly, the future of auto, not EVs. And the consumer is responding.

Kara Swisher: I think people will eventually get to EVs. I think it's one of these things that's going to go through that. But you're right. People are slowly moving that direction, and they will then feel more comfortable with EVs. I have a lot of people asking about EVs because I have one of each. Their sales are booming. And Toyota, I mean, just to give you a sense.

Scott Galloway: You made fun of my Kia hybrid.

Kara Swisher: I just want to know.

Scott Galloway: Well, whatever. Just talk about your magic and pay for a Discover card and boom. No third marriage for you. Kia hybrid. So get this, Toyota, which I believe is now growing faster than Tesla, has a price-earnings ratio of 9. Tesla is 72. I mean, price to sales, Toyota trades at 0.9 times sales. Tesla trades, depending on the numbers you're looking at, somewhere between 7 and 9 times sales. And they are making a better car that's more in tune with consumer demands right now, that foots better to how consumers want to interface with electric without the charging infrastructure nightmare. And it trades at a—one of these companies is under or overvalued.

Kara Swisher: Yeah. So one of the things they're working on is vertical lift and takeoff stuff, too. Interesting. They're doing some—

Scott Galloway: I see. Yeah, VTOLs, yeah. VTOLs. They're involved in that, too. Anyway, they're a very smart company. But let's get to our first story. Voters are split 50-50 after Governor Tim Walz and Senator J.D. Vance faced off in a VP debate on Tuesday, according to a Politico poll. The two VP candidates discussed immigration, abortion, and other election tokens. People kind of liked it. They said it was civil and interesting. Although there were some moments during the conversation on immigration, moderators cut the mics of both candidates when Vance interrupted to say the hosts were not supposed to be fact-checking him per debate rules.

Kara Swisher: He shouldn't have done that. He looked like an idiot.

Scott Galloway: No, he looked strong there, Kara.

Kara Swisher: No, he did not. He looked dumb. Like, just answer the question. He was wrong. They said they weren't going to fact check, and that was fact checking.

Scott Galloway: No, they didn't quite say that. They didn't. It was none necessary. They said at the beginning of the debate, we're not going to fact check, and they fact checked, and he called them out for it.

Kara Swisher: No, lots of people didn't like that. Another standout moment. Vance refused to answer the question of whether he believes Trump lost the 2020 election. This was a weak point, which Waltz called a damning non-answer. But also, again, it was mostly more civil than presidential debates. A lot of people were noting on that. Let's listen to a moment during the closing remarks. "Well, I've enjoyed tonight's debate, and I think there was a lot of commonality here. And I'm sympathetic to misspeaking on things, and I think I might have with the senator." "Me too, man." Yeah, it was actually interesting. It sort of normalized J.D. Vance, who I think is a very dangerous character. But what are your overall takeaways? You go first.

Scott Galloway: The biggest winner here was America. It demonstrated how our elected representatives are supposed to acquit themselves. They were respectful. They didn't interrupt each other a lot. I thought Margaret and Nora O'Donnell, Margaret Brennan, did a fantastic job. And it just made me feel better about being an American. And it contrasted the chaos and bullshit and childlike behavior that happens when Trump is in any room or in something like a debate. The next biggest winner was J.D. Vance. He came across as very intelligent, reasoned, thoughtful, his agility around. I mean, you got to keep in mind, he's playing with a much worse hand than Walz. Walz can say to him, "Hey, does your boss believe that Biden won the election?" And Vance was able to say, "Well, OK, first off, Hillary Clinton didn't believe there was election. Give me some running room." He counters with Hillary Clinton did the same thing and censorship is worse.

Kara Swisher: Okay, you're right. That is the mother of all false equivalences. Secretary Clinton showed up at the inauguration and she conceded, right? Censorship is fucking ridiculous. And this red herring, anyone who claims censorship won't shut the fuck up and has a top podcast and is everywhere.

Scott Galloway: But I got to give it to the guy. He took chicken shit and made it mostly chicken salad and given the hand he's been dealt, he did really well. I thought Walz started off shaky, got better. They both cemented their brand as Walz's brand is likable. And he was very likable. And Vance's brand is intelligent. And he came off as very intelligent. And the big winner here, other than America, was Vance. Because quite frankly, coming out of this debate, Vance, in my view, is probably the top contender for the GOP nomination in 2028.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I think that's what people think. I think you saw the future of the Republican Party.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, I do.

Kara Swisher: You know, he lies a lot, just more deftly. I'm sorry. He just, there's several lies he told. And that's not a good thing. Like, oh, so he managed to normalize his lies. And I don't know if that's a positive thing. He's certainly a serious contender. That is no question about that. And I think he acquits himself well. He's still a creepy person who does have an issue with women. It's a real issue which he didn't let out, he didn't show that, he didn't take the mask off on that thing. But some of his other comments are disturbing if you go back in any interview. They're disturbing in the extreme.

Scott Galloway: But doesn't every politician have to do that? Who the fuck would want to do this?

Kara Swisher: When I look at some of these, you've got to go back and look at these interviews, Scott. They're disturbed. Nobody talks like this.

Scott Galloway: No, I've seen them.

Kara Swisher: And so I think he's able to normalize his very dark view of humanity in a way that... I like, if he wasn't such a dark character, I would say this was a really nice civil thing and every politician lies, but he manages to take anything where there's false equivalency and try to really... He cannot miss a moment of lying about something. He just can't admit anything. He cannot say, "Yes, this is a problem. No, this is..." And I would like our public officials to say, "I made a mistake" or "Yes, this was wrong." He cannot do that as a person.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, but what is he going to say? "I hate my mother. And as a result, I'm a deep, dark misogynist. And I'm supporting a guy who I generally think is the American Hitler." I mean, I agree with everything you've said. He was very good.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, he was.

Scott Galloway: No, he is really good. I still don't think it matters in any way whatsoever. But I do think it sets him up for the future. That's for sure.

Kara Swisher: It's already out of the news cycle.

Scott Galloway: Yeah. You know what it was? It was mostly a split decision. A split decision amongst the VP debate is pretty much a nothing burger.

Kara Swisher: Right, exactly. So, and it doesn't really matter. But you do have to see who's going to, you know, as you say, the actuarial tables show that this guy might be president. So that's why we're paying attention to him, right? Because Donald Trump is old. And obviously, speaking of which, adults beyond belief, this last speech he gave, and finally, the Washington Post wrote about it very, you know, they wrote about it with Joe Biden all the time. Donald Trump, it wasn't just a crazy word salad that he usually is. There's something happening to him cognitively that is very, I don't know what it is, but it was really pronounced this past week. And he's either drugged or something has gone wrong. And it's not his usual cup of crazy.

Scott Galloway: Nothing's gone wrong. It's called being 78. And with a history of Alzheimer's in your family.

Kara Swisher: I kept thinking, what is happening to this guy's words? Anyway, and I think we should call it out because I called out for Biden. I think Donald Trump is cognitively stabled. So we have some. So this guy might be president. That's all I'm saying. That's why it matters. So we also have some new evidence. This is interesting. This just dropped last night in the 2020 election case against Donald Trump unsealed by a judge on Wednesday revealed special counsel Jack Smith's outline of the former president's desperate attempts to overturn the 2020 election, which has been reported, but some of it was not, which was interesting. He kind of put it together in a timeline. Smith emphasized that Trump's scheme was a private criminal effort and that he's acting as a candidate, not a president. He needs to do that because of the Supreme Court decision that presidents have immunity for official acts, but not private acts. One of the things was when he was told about the danger to Mike Pence, he said, "So what?" And then another point he went by, aides kind of had it with his non-reaction. They left the dining room he was throwing ketchup in, and he started writing very dangerous tweets about Mike Pence that put him in direct danger. And this is when he was cogent. Do you think this matters that this came out? Do voters care?

Scott Galloway: I think it's add to the list of things. Nobody cares that this guy's a criminal, I guess. If there's anything that is disqualifying here, it's January 6th and his behavior. I'm pretty sure you felt this way. When I saw this mob hunting down our elected representatives and I saw them cowering in the rafters, in the rotunda, I thought it was arguably the most shameful day we've had.

Kara Swisher: I agree.

Scott Galloway: American people and how much they either, their sycophancy can override their sense of justice and right or wrong, or that things are so bad for so many Americans that they will accept this in exchange for someone they think is going to burn it all down. But that to me was absolutely the low point in America for the last, I don't know, 40 or 50 years. And it just, it just showed me I have no political instincts because I thought that's it. I thought he was going to be in prison. And I thought for sure he'd be out of all public sight whatsoever. And it's a toss up right now for president. I just don't get it. I have terrible political instincts. That's what it taught me.

Kara Swisher: Yeah. I you know, I do think you need to have this historical record, right? You need to have it said what he did so that even if they don't care, it doesn't matter. He did it. He said, "So what?" He sat in that dining room, you know, addled on whatever the fuck he takes, all the different things and ketchup and put someone in danger. This is someone who's a sociopath, as far as I can tell. And that's what I read it. I was sort of like, what is sociopathic behavior? And I think putting the timeline together, no matter what, will follow this man into his grave. Right. This is this kind of stuff. He may not pay for himself. I think it's critically important that this is laid out. There's so much stuff he's done and others have done that have not like the stuff in Ukraine, the antics, you know, that Rudy Giuliani did. Why isn't Rudy Giuliani in jail for criminal acts? Right. And so I think that we'll follow these people to the ends of the earth to put it down. But I agree with you. I don't know if it matters. I think everyone's like everything's baked in. And I'm like, that is a sick indictment of this country if everything is baked in and it doesn't matter what he does. But I thought it's worth reading this. I don't know if it'll matter or voters care or have already figured this out that he did this and have decided they don't care. But the ones that care, care. Right. And so we'll see where it goes. But I think it's important to lay it all out and to act like we're a nation of laws and not men. So we'll see. We'll see. And I think the Internet, speaking of we're not remembering the vice president debate, we're not remembering the assassination attempts. We're not remembering the like everything goes through in this fast moving way that we've that it's just like it is like a television show. And you're like next on this thing. So maybe it'll be next. But it matters, I think. Anyway, let's go on a quick break. We come back. We'll talk about the aftermath of Hurricane Helene. We haven't talked about it and take a listener mail question about dating goals where you could make your joke, Scott.

[BREAK]

Scott Galloway: Scott, we're back with our second big story, the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, which is now the second deadliest hurricane of the century behind Katrina. Here's a look at the situation by numbers. Right now, there are at least 180 dead and 100 still missing. $160 billion of economic damage so far, according to AccuWeather. Tower communities have been destroyed. More than a million are still without power. Tens of thousands are without running water. The Biden administration has deployed over 5,000 National Guardsmen and 1,000 active-duty troops. Biden visited the Carolinas Wednesday. Kamala Harris was in Georgia. Donald Trump visited Georgia earlier this week in his campaign, set up a GoFundMe account. All right, sure. Aside from the obvious political tragedy, I mean, obvious weather tragedy, this is a political situation. And not just because there are two swing states involved, North Carolina and Georgia. You know, Donald Trump quickly spread misinformation. What a surprise. He claimed that Georgia Governor Brian Kemp couldn't get in touch with Biden in the aftermath of the storm. Both Biden and Kemp disputed that. He also took credit for asking Elon Musk to get Starlink access to damaged areas. FEMA tweeted in response, "This is already happening." Elon-backed President Trump's version of events, but of course he would. And of course, Trump disaster response has usually been terrible. Talk a little bit about this from a political point of view, but also the devastation here and the photos are just disturbing in the extreme what's happening there. And people thought they were safe in certain parts of the country, like Asheville. They thought they were climate safe and they certainly were not from these rising rivers. Any thoughts?

Scott Galloway: Yeah, well, you touched on it. So if you believe in science and think that science is kind of the best ideas we have and maybe the closest to an actual truth, you know, the waters have heated up one degree centigrade, or I think it's about, what is that about? I don't know what that is in Fahrenheit. Anyways, they're getting warmer. And that spins up hurricanes faster and makes them more severe. And one of the outcomes of that severity is they're moving inland and affecting areas, including Asheville, that just aren't weather ready. When you're in Florida, whether it's hurricane windows, I mean, I don't want to say you're prepared, but you know, eventually, if you're living in Florida, you're going to have to deal with this and you make preparations, whether it's insurance, whether it's the quality of your roof or whatever it is, or a generator. I spent a bunch of time and money thinking on alternative energy supplies if our power goes out. So this is just the fact that we politicize this and don't want to just look at the data is just going to create more and more severe weather events. And what you said really struck me, and it's true and tragic, is that Americans are very, or excuse me, humans are very adaptable. And we're just getting used to this shit and we shouldn't be getting used to it. Now, on a political stage, we're talking about all this stuff that we'd like to control, the VP debate, the convention, the bump, the three things or one of three things that'll probably decide this election, given that it's in the margin of error right now, are one of three things or two of those three. And that is who is perceived as having the better response to Hurricane Helene, like if Biden and Harris can be seen down there with a FEMA jacket and looking strong and bringing people together, or if it's kind of George Bush's Katrina event where he just looks like an idiot having appointed his political buddies who just fucked up left and right.

Kara Swisher: Great job, Brownie. Remember that?

Scott Galloway: Yeah, great. Brownie's doing an amazing job. And then two, the Longshoremen strike. This is probably, I would argue, the one that might jump up and bite one or both of them in the ass because it feels to me awfully opportune that these, that longshoremen have gone on strike. I do believe they deserve a raise. I think they're in a position of leverage, which I respect and appreciate. But if this thing starts costing the economy $5 billion a day, does Biden step in? Does he show strength? Does he show empathy? Is Trump able to make political hay? There's some rumors.

Kara Swisher: Well, the head of the longshoremen is a Trumper.

Scott Galloway: Trumper, yeah. But is that going to be good? Could that backfire? If Biden steps in and says, you know, "Fuck yourself. You're not going to fuck with the economy" and forces everyone back to work. That is a big issue. And then the third wild card is what's happening in the Middle East, and that is Israel's response to Iran and who gets credit or non-credit for that. But I think one of those three issues or more than one of those three issues is going to determine the election at this point.

Kara Swisher: Interesting. So these are news events that matter, I guess, because everything else sails by in like a... You know, you have your plan and then God laughs. God is laughing at the presidential election with these three events. It's a toss up. Someone is going to get a lot of credit or a lot of blame for one or more in terms of their approach and how they address one or more of these three issues.

Scott Galloway: Who actually was down there first? Jose Andres with food. Incredible. He should be president. Honestly. World Central Kitchen was the first group down there over everybody.

Kara Swisher: I didn't know that.

Scott Galloway: Feeding people. Yeah. What an organization. What are your thoughts? Do you think that one of these three?

Kara Swisher: No, I think, I thought it was, I don't know why Trump tried to politicize it right at the beginning. It was grotesque, but that's, you know, it's any other Tuesday with Escafella. I, you know, I agree with you. I think this idea that, you know, it was interesting was people moved to Asheville. And I know a lot of, I love Asheville. It's a beautiful town. But they used to say, "I'm moving here because it's a climate haven." They did. I've been there. And, you know, here's where it's safe, where it's going to be safe against climate change. You're not safe anywhere around climate change. You just are not. And the second part is like, to me, climate change is really going to be the interesting thing over the next couple of years, because like I was just reading an interesting story about insurance rates now in California and Florida. They're not insuring. They've just stopped insuring. And so some people have stopped doing insurance in these places or having insurance or-

Scott Galloway: Well, I can't get insurance where I have-

Kara Swisher: Right, you can't get it. That's the other thing, right? And so to me, that was an opportunity for, I hate to say this, Gavin Newsom and Ron DeSantis to get together, right, and come up with something to self-insure or whatever. But it's certainly, there's all kinds of opportunities to come together, right, in these things like Jose Andres and World Central Kitchen. He feeds everybody. He doesn't care who you vote for. Or it's an opportunity to split people up. I think people do respond to people who are going to bring people together and solve problems. And so I think people are desperate for problem solvers, not divisiveness. And so whoever does that best here finds a way to settle with this longshoreman who I think is just, I'll tell you why he offended me. He's like, "My guys will do this." I'm like, "They're not your fucking guys, right?" You know what I mean?

Scott Galloway: He does.

Kara Swisher: I know Indian people talk like that. He's not in charge. He's not the king. He should try to find the best deal for the constituents he works for, right? But, of course, it's all cynical with this guy. And so if I were his constituents, I'd be pretty pissed that he's doing this.

Scott Galloway: I think they've been offered a 52% raise, but the WGA was able to extract 5% for their riders.

Kara Swisher: Right, yeah.

Scott Galloway: He's already gotten 52%. He's rejected that deal and said, "No, I want 77%." And he's going to—they're probably—you know what? They're within striking distance. I think they're probably going to solve this thing.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I hope so. I just find this guy offensive because of the way he talked. I was listening to him give a speech. But again, the ridiculous request that makes no sense is we want to put the technology back in the bottle. We want no automation. It's like, sorry, boss. No, forget it. Sorry, boss. You're going to take what everybody else is going to take.

Scott Galloway: Anyway, well, you know. Let's see what AI says.

Kara Swisher: Let's see what AI says.

Scott Galloway: I can't wait to say that.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I can't wait for you to do that. Can you tape it, please? Can you do that?

Scott Galloway: No, it's going to be great.

Kara Swisher: Please tape it with one of those jiggly cameras for us. Anyway, what's happening there? One of the things that is good and bad about the Internet is so many pictures coming through and it's devastating and people and stories and things like that. But there are some organizations you can check out that are providing help in states affected by Helene. World Central Kitchen, as I said, Jose Andres, what an amazing man he's become with this effort. AmeriCares, Operation Airdrop, the Humane Society and many more. So please give if you can. They're really suffering there. Okay, Scott, let's pivot to a listener question. This question comes in via email. I'll read it. "Hi, Kara and Scott. I work remotely and recently went through a breakup. Currently, I live in North Carolina, but I'm considering moving. As a 30-year-old ambitious man, I'm looking to maximize my dating prospects and increase my earning potential. Should I think about relocating closer to my company's headquarters in Florida to build stronger work relationships or should I challenge myself by moving to New York City and maybe a medium cost city like Austin or stay here where I can save more and leverage my six-figure salary to invest in the stock market in real estate. For context, I work in finance sales. I am a non-white straight male. Looking forward to your thought. Best, Andres." Oh, Andres. I hope you're in a safe part of North Carolina. What do you think, Scott? What do you think without making a dirty joke?

Scott Galloway: Yeah, that's the last part. That's the hard part. Okay, Andres. So mating is like any other market, and you want to go where there's more demand than supply for what you're offering. So let's just start with the basic. You're a male. There are certain cities. Basically, cities attract more women than men. And the reason why after my divorce, I immediately bought places in New York and South Beach is there are a lot more quality women than quality men. And so a five gets to date a seven. So by virtue of just moving to a city, most cities, especially the coastal cities, you have somewhat of an advantage. And in places like New York or Miami, it is champagne and cocaine for men. Talk to women about dating. Their misery in Miami and New York, quite frankly, is your disco. Now, having said that, what trumps all of this, what trumps all of this in your 30s is nothing increases your attractiveness and increases your potential selection set of mates than economic security. Women are attracted to men for three reasons. Number three, reverse order, how kind they are. Women long term want someone who's going to be good to them and to their family too. Intelligence. If you're smart, you're more likely to make good decisions for the tribe and make good decisions for the family and her kids will survive. And then number one, whether you like it or not, there's a ton of evidence, is your ability to signal resources. Women go through a period in their lives where they are bearing children and they need a guy with resources to ensure their kids survive. So what you want to be focused on in your 30s is killing it professionally. So get to headquarters because at headquarters, you will accelerate 30 to 40 percent faster than someone who is not at headquarters. So take all the bullshit I said about cities out of the equation. In your 30s, you want to be sexy. No matter where you are, make a shit ton of money. You're going to make more money at headquarters.

Kara Swisher: Yep. OK, good. I would agree with you. I think living in North Carolina and being remote, it sounds like a very bad prescription for meeting anybody. I had a relative, I'm not going to go into it in detail, a younger relative who was living in Missouri. I advised him to get the hell to Atlanta, and he did, and he's married, and he's very happily married now. I don't think, you know, if you're in a remote area by yourself as a young single person, especially a man, in an area that doesn't have a lot of prospects, you're going to have any prospects. More women in cities. You're going to have a lot of money. You're going to have a lot of cash, but what are you going to do with it? You're going to probably drink that money, you know, essentially, or do whatever. So I think you should move. It's like, everything shouldn't be a monetary decision. Lean into your advantage if you're mobile.

Scott Galloway: That's right.

Kara Swisher: And if you make a six-figure salary, you'll be fine no matter where you are. And so, you know, and you're also happier with someone. There's, you know, honestly, there's just no question. Move, move, move, move. I don't know if you should move to headquarters or a cool city, but either way, you'll do well. I don't, you know, Scott and I are not all plus on remote work, even though both of us do it, interestingly, but we have established families already. I think later in your life, you could do remote work. When you're younger, don't do remote work. Get into the office or get into the whatever. Once you have money and relationships, remote work's an unlock. If you don't have a partner and you haven't made a lot of money, the office is a feature, not a benefit. Get into the office.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, later you can leave and ignore people like we do.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, Andres, thank you so much. And good luck.

Scott Galloway: Good luck. Tell us when you get married.

Kara Swisher: Okay. If you've got a question of your own and you'd like answered, send it our way. Go to nymag.com slash pivot. Submit a question for the show or call 855-51-PIVOT. All right, Scott. One more quick break. We'll be back for predictions from you. I know you're in the prediction mode as the year ends.

[BREAK]

Kara Swisher: Okay, Scott, let's hear a prediction. Do you have any predictions?

Kara Swisher: Oh, hmm. I do. I had an interesting discussion. When you travel, you talk to people and you start to hear their views. I know all our focus is on the election right now. I think a lot of people are really leaning in and paying attention. But I do think there is a quiet group of women in this country, the way there was a quiet group of Trump supporters. And maybe I'm wrong, but I'm convinced that the election will be not as close as people think it is.

Scott Galloway: You know who agrees with her? I think she's going to win.

Kara Swisher: Who?

Scott Galloway: Bill Maher.

Kara Swisher: Oh, does he? Interesting. He made a prediction. He said he thinks that Vice President Harris is not only going to win, but she's going to win decisively. I think it's going to be women. Women vote. There's a lot of focus on young men and what they do. They never go to vote. They're lazy. And I think women are motivated. Every woman I talk to is doing something, whether it's raising money or whatever. So I really... I don't know. I could be really wrong. But I think that Trump's grip is a lot less strong than people think. I think everyone has just let him get away with shit, all his supporters. I think everyone has had enough. He's got a ceiling and he's reached it. That's my feeling. Anyway, it is about turnout. As much as Elon Musk is giving him money, I don't think they have as good a turnout as the Democrats. But we'll see.

Scott Galloway: All right, Scott, do you have a prediction?

Kara Swisher: I do. You inspired one.

Scott Galloway: So I think we're about to undertake, or we're beginning, what I'd call the Great Rotation. Since 2008, capital flows and market dynamics always trump individual performance. So you'd rather be a mediocre stock in America right now than a really good company in Argentina. Because every year since 2008, capital flows have leaked out of everywhere and into the U.S., such that the S&P trades at a higher P/E than any market in the world. With the Chinese market actually ripping up last week—since the beginning of September, they're up more than 30%—I think the starting gun has been fired. The U.S. market as a ratio of how it trades relative to other markets has not seen these highs since 1999 or 2007. With Chinese stocks making a comeback, with the stimulus announced, with a bunch of people getting their greed glands going, ETFs have surged, capital flows into China have surged. It's going to lift stocks in places like China, places like Brazil. You're going to have a rotation back into emerging or developing markets. I think markets outside of the U.S. are going to outperform the U.S. over the next three to five years.

Kara Swisher: Oh, that's interesting. That's a good one. How'd you just come up with that one on the top of your head? That was good. That was helpful.

Scott Galloway: I'm glad. Very helpful. It's a good prediction. That's why I'm here.

Kara Swisher: How is your predictions deck going, by the way, speaking of predictions?

Scott Galloway: Well, it's just so discouraging. Last year, I would loosely describe my predictions as wrong. I just shit the bed on everything. I got almost everything wrong.

Kara Swisher: I love when you talk about that, though. We'll go over that with your shit in the bed. Everything. Just literally everything. Was I right then? I forget what you predicted.

Scott Galloway: You have much better political instincts than me.

Kara Swisher: That's correct. Most people realize that.

Scott Galloway: My wife, Amanda, is like, "Yeah, Scott was great on Beto." Oh, then he was...

Kara Swisher: That's the only mean thing she says about your political prediction.

Scott Galloway: Well, whatever. It's really sad to me because there's only a one in four chance I'm going to get to see Amanda again, according to these divorce statistics.

Kara Swisher: Oh, stop it. We're not getting a divorce. I am never getting a divorce.

Scott Galloway: I just assume lesbians on a regular basis cry and hug for three hours and decide never to see each other again. Is that wrong? Is that wrong?

Kara Swisher: No. You know what? In general, not everybody for sure, but mostly lesbians get along with their exes. A lot of straights don't.

Scott Galloway: Not you. You get along with them.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, you get along with them. Yeah. She's coming for Christmas.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, no, it's great. My kids, my little kids love her. She's a lovely person. There were issues, but I think we've done a nice job trying to...

Kara Swisher: I told you how I met your ex-wife, right?

Scott Galloway: No, how? What?

Kara Swisher: I was at a conference in Germany or something. I was speaking. I talked about Amazon. She came up to me and she's like, "You are not giving Mackenzie Bezos enough credit for starting Amazon." And I look at her and I'm like, "Oh, do you have a background in technology?" She's like, "Yeah, and I was the CTO of America." I'm like, "Oh my God. Were you married to Kara Swisher?" Anyways, your ex-wife. She didn't lead with that.

Scott Galloway: She didn't lead with that.

Kara Swisher: Your ex-wife came up and reprimanded me after my talk. She's good at that shit. She's a real supporter of women in technology. That's her thing. If you said anything crossways, she'd have come at you. She's a tall lady, right?

Scott Galloway: She's tall. She's a big lady. That's an impressive woman.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, she is. She's great. Come for Christmas at the Lesbians Who Get Along Club.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, I'm not getting a divorce, okay? I'm going to South Africa.

Kara Swisher: You are? Yeah. Oh, nice.

Scott Galloway: Taking my sister for her 50th to Africa.

Kara Swisher: No, we're going to San Francisco. We're going to have a great time. Yeah, we always do. I win. I win on that one.

Scott Galloway: Cape Town. No, we love it there. Cape Town over San Francisco. I win.

Kara Swisher: No, no. We're not escaping. Have you been to Cape Town?

Scott Galloway: Have you been to Cape Town? No, but we don't need to escape ourselves. The most beautiful city in the world.

Kara Swisher: We like ourselves. We like ourselves. You mean explore the world while we still can? We don't need a beautiful— anyway, in any case, I'm going to come up for Christmas with you at some time.

Scott Galloway: I hate the holidays, just so you know. I hate the holidays.

Kara Swisher: See, that's why you're escaping. Exactly what I just said.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, God.

Kara Swisher: In any case, Scott, we'll all have a Merry Christmas. I'm excited to hear your predictions for the year and your assessment of what you got wrong. Okay, that's the show. Before we go, we're up for the Best Co-Host Team in the Signal Awards.

Scott Galloway: I don't know what that is. Really? I didn't know about that. Who are we up against?

Kara Swisher: I'm marching to competition. Let's find out. But we deserve it. Vote for us at the link in the description. And again, Dax Shepard, I extend my apologies to you on Scott's behalf.

Scott Galloway: You call me. Didn't mean it, Dax. Didn't mean it.

Kara Swisher: You kind of meant it a little bit.

Scott Galloway: I want to work out with that guy. That guy's ripped.

Kara Swisher: No, he's not working out with you. He's definitely not working out with you. That guy's so ripped.

Scott Galloway: Anyway, we'll be back on Tuesday with more Pivot and I'm certain more news of all things tech and business.

[AD BREAK]

Kara Swisher: With Acrobat. Now you can do that. Do that with the all-new Acrobat. It's time to do your best work with the all-new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

Scott Galloway: What do walking 10,000 steps every day, eating five servings of fruits and veggies, and getting eight hours of sleep have in common? They're all healthy choices. But do all healthier choices really pay off? With prescription plans from CVS Caremark, they do. Their plan designs give your members more choice, which gives your members more ways to get on, stay on, and manage their meds. And that helps your business control your costs, because healthier members are better for business. Go to cmk.co.access to learn more about helping your members stay adherent. That's cmk.co.access.