Trump Threatens Insurrection Act, Paramount Sues Warner Bros, and Apple Teams Up with Google for AI

Support for today's show comes from Atteo, the AI CRM. If you've ever used a CRM and thought, why does this feel like a second job? Atteo is worth a look. Atteo is the AI CRM that builds itself. You connect your email and calendar and it pulls in every company, every contact, and every interaction. Already organized in one place. From there, it keeps itself up to date. It understands your customer calls, adapts to how your business works, and the AI agents take action in the background so you can focus on what matters. If you need an intelligent CRM that scales and grows with your business from day one, that's Atio. You can go to atio.com slash pivot and you'll get 15% off your first year. That's A-T-T-I-O dot com slash pivot. Everyone's heard of a midlife crisis, but what about a mid-career crisis? Turns out countless people are going through one right now. For some, they're starting to feel they've hit a wall, that there's no room for growth, no new opportunities, promotions pass them by, raises are few and far between. Others worry they're becoming replaceable, either by younger talent or by technology. And still others find themselves asking over and over, is this all there is? If any of this feels familiar, it's time to visit strawberry.me, where a certified career coach will work with you to get you out of your rut and help you move forward, either at your current job or by helping you land a new, more rewarding one. Your Strawberry Coach will help you turn a mid-career crisis into a mid-career revival. Go to strawberry.me slash unstuck and get 50% off your first coaching session. That's strawberry.me slash unstuck. Now is the most affordable time ever to find out if career coaching is right for you. We all have that dream trip we've been wishing we could go on. But too often, life, or usually price, gets in the way. That's why Priceline is here to help you turn your dream trip into reality. With up to 60% off hotels and up to 50% off flights, you can book everything you need for your next adventure. Don't just dream about that next trip. Book it with Priceline. Download the Priceline app or visit Priceline.com and book your next trip today. Go to your happy price, Priceline. If HBO is cocaine and Netflix is edibles, CBS is literally like fiber supplement. Hi everyone This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network I Kara Swisher And I Scott Galloway How you doing Scott I doing well How are you This has been quite a week What going on in this country is really disturbing on so many levels It's been disturbing. I don't know. How are you doing? How's everything going? How are you feeling? I feel better. Yeah, everything's good. It's good to be in New York. Yeah. What are you doing in the city, the greatest city in the world? Oh, God. Whenever I'm here, I've got like a ton of... I mean, my professional center of gravity is in the U.S. So whenever I'm here, it's just like meeting after meeting after meeting. So, and I'm doing a meeting with the team tonight from Property Markets, and we have our meeting tomorrow, a big strategy meeting. So just, you know, stuff. Yeah, we're being, it's called strategery, just so you know, strategery. Nice. Do you have any big ideas that you're going to bring to bear? Big, big ideas. Fan dancing? I don't know. Obviously our tour this year turned out very well. our version of a tour, and it was very profitable and fun, also, most importantly. But we have to think of something cool. Any listeners who have ideas of what you want Scott and I to do, pole dancing, a show about, you know, gay hockey players, whatever you want. I just think the next tour should involve white tigers. Oh, you're going to see. This is a little puppy. We just got Bobo. This is his first time on stage. He's very... Did you ever see all that stuff on Roy and Siegfried? I never went to the Target shows. No, I always got talked into another type of performance down the road. Oh, right. Yeah. Okay. All right. I love them. I love them. I love them. Anyway. Anyway, we've got a lot to get to today. So let's get started. Donald Trump, and I can't believe I'm saying this, is threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act as anti-ICE protests intensify in Minneapolis, largely because they've been egged on by ICE itself. The latest protests in the city began when a federal officer shot a man in the leg on Wednesday just a week after an ICE agent fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Good. I don't quite know what to say. This is like, they are, from what, the word in Washington is Stephen Miller wants something that he can invoke. the Insurrection Act, and then declare martial law so they can't have midterm elections. That's the conspiracy theory running around Washington right now. And I gotta say this is they are causing the problem that you can look at these videos and see like absolutely pushing over old people asking for people papers I feel like I in the middle of like a Nazi movie or something at this point Thoughts? Well, we talked about this last time. The very founding of America was meant to avoid this. Not wanting a monarch that could have unilateral unchecked power and start harassing and terrorizing the population is the basis of the founding of America. The question is, what do you do about it? And what's really disappointed me, and I've been on the phone with a couple Democrats, is I believe that people at ICE and the officials and administrators who have ordered them and created a context around this, I think that they potentially could be guilty of second or third degree murder, of manslaughter, of criminally negligent homicide, and absolutely of assault. and what I would be doing very publicly in the Congress and Senate is passing two types of or proposing two types of laws which will not pass now but should we have the kind of momentum we believe we're going to have in 26 and then in 28 make sure that these officials ordering this type of depraved behavior and the people executing it understand that this is absolutely a possibility and those two bills are the following one is criminal charges and resources will be allocated and very with a fine tooth and comb go through all of this video and be willing to charge these individuals. And two, something that says potentially that for certain types of crimes, including anything with the word homicide in it, that from this point forward, once the pardons are no longer valid, there has to be, I do find that the Democrats, the strongly worded letter kind of defines, in my opinion, and Democrats will say, well, look, there's very little we can do, and I'm sympathetic to that because they do not, they're the minority in all three houses. I get it. But these folks need to be reminded very swiftly that, okay, the same overrun of judicial power and co-equal branches of government that you've committed, we could do the same, But we going to do it to quite frankly go we believe the law just enforced as it is correctly could put many of these people behind bars or at a minimum impair their careers which would be justifiable and begin laying the groundwork Yeah absolutely You know one of the things that hard is that they keep doubling down right Like there was you know this I sorry it a specious report from CBS News no surprise at this point. Well, they're relying less on experts and academics. Yes, I know. Speaking to you. God, I hated that. Don't make me go into that ridiculous disaster over there. Can I just rant on that for a minute? Please, go right ahead. Because you can Nikki Glazer this for me, my friend. Go ahead. Well, I actually like- She made a joke. I'm referencing a Golden Globe joke. I like the guy who's the next head of the anchor. I actually think he's a great pick. I think he's handsome, which I think- Oh, I think it's all they could get. But go ahead. I think he's really solid. I think he's really handsome. I get it, but it's all they could get. They were looking at elsewhere, but go ahead. And I assume that he's a good person because I like Katie Tour and assume that anyone she decides to spend her life with is a good person. But that opening monologue, it was fine except for the part, and we're going to rely on It's something along the lines of we're going to rely less on the academics and the experts and more on what the people think. That's saying, okay, we're going to start entertaining conspiracy theory and misinformation. And by the way, folks, the word expert in the U.S. might as well be the word meritocracy. And that is you can be a kid growing up in the poorest village outside of Hyderabad in India. And if you were just so fucking talented and hardworking and smart and end up at, I think it's called IIT, you can end up being one of those experts at Harvard that they're not going to listen to that knows more than anyone else in the world on mRNA vaccines. You can be the son of a single mother who lived and died an expert and someday, quote unquote, work your fucking ass off to be considered an expert in brand strategy. So this notion that they're not going to listen to expertise, it's like we want an excuse to impose political values or fucking Ouija boards or horoscopes or whatever trending on Twitter, as opposed to listening to the people who've actually fucking earned it. And one of the great things about America is it is, in fact, a meritocracy. Sometimes it's a bit too much of a meritocracy, and that is the people who aren't talented or aren't fortunate live a very harsh life here. But be clear, meritocracy means capitalism, means expertise. People who are experts are people who get paid a lot to provide input. So if we're not going with the experts and the academics, I don't mind. And a lot to provide input. So if we're not going with the experts and the academics, I don't mind. And they've done this forever. News does a lot of kind of quote unquote man on the street. Let's talk to people in the community and see how they feel at the barbershop or the diner. But we're going to start listening to them about vaccine safety, not epidemiologists who have written peer review research for the last 30 fucking years. Let me interject here because I'm going to because it's repulsive. I know you're being very kind to this guy, but he's done six or seven things that are really problematic. One is talking about more transparent than Walter Cronkite, doing this kiss-ass, all the interviews, I'm so sorry, but they're PR for the Trump administration is what they are. They're terrible interviews. And he has an opportunity, given they're sucking up, to do an actual tough interview. He is doing a disservice to journalism in these interviews, given that he's got this access. But it isn't any worse than Fox. Yes, exactly. Thank you. Fox is entertainment. Like, this is CBS News. Saying he's more transparent than Walter Cronkite. We unapologetically love America. What does a news organization need to, that's not their job. We're going to do, we're going to give, one they did this week is really, another one he said this week was just equally idiotic. And there was a story in the New York Times that everyone should read, like, we want to be the news. News does not want to be the news. News reports the news. You know, this is a stunt. This is all stunts all the time flying across the country. I know a lot of people at CBS News, they're beside themselves is what's happening there. And it's depressing to watch. And this guy is doing it. I'm sorry. Whatever you think of him as a nice person, and I think he probably is. I know Katie. Katie's terrific. But it doesn't matter. This is just a disservice. It's a state organization. It's a state media organization is what's happening. And this story, let me get back to what we were talking about. this ICE officer has all these internal injuries. You get internal bleeding from, or whatever, internal bleeding from taking Advil, everybody. We don't see this guy. There's no proof of it. And they just, all they do is say, federal officials say it. Here, Pravda, here's what we want you to say. It doesn't have any reporting involved in it. And it's in order to create this ridiculous, and everyone has seen the video that this guy was more hurt than her. I sorry she dead And he has I don know a bruise Then to be a facilitate that is really bad And so I think what they trying to do is create equalization and trying to sort of smear this woman who seems to have been in the PTA, you know, calling this whole thing about women wine moms, angry wine moms, or white women who are smug, lectured by men, white men who are smug, who actually invented smug. It's just this equalization. And again, one person's dead, one person's shot in the leg, and the others aren't. And I just, it's, I don't know what to say. And for a news organization to go along with that is really an embarrassment to the legacy of Walter Cronkite. Here's the good news, it's fucking irrelevant. Yes, it is. That's true. It's true. If HBO is cocaine and Netflix is edibles, CBS is literally like fiber supplement. Psyllium. What's that called? Psyllium. If you were to visit one of their editorial meetings, right? Yeah. You'd go in and you'd see a giant whiteboard and they'd write, okay, our audience is tired, scared, and eating a lot of soup. I mean, who cares? You're right. The numbers are really bad. It doesn't really fucking matter what a lower middle income 83-year-old in Iowa who... I know, but Fox does it well, I have to say. They do their heinous shit well. Well, they've gone full, you know, stripper pole, cosplaying, political news. I mean, and they're also very talented and they've leaned into... They're entertaining in a really heinous way, I would say. Anyway, you're right. The numbers are down. I wouldn't even know how to find CBS online. Although I have been watching... Wait, is Landman... That's CBS. That's Paramount, right? That's Paramount, yeah. But he's leaving. That shit's really good. But he's leaving. He went over to Universal. Yeah, but he produced Landman. I really enjoy it. Yeah, that guy is super talented. I've tried to get him on my show. I love all his shows. I watched Yellowstone from the start. But they're all gone. He's leaving, going over to Universal. I don't know, some fuck up by the Ellisons. Let me guess, more money. Anyway, it's good for him. But anyways, Landman is really good. But I want you to, where do you think this goes from, I get that you want Democrats to speak out more, But what is the, I mean, because the numbers for Trump are cratering on all this stuff. So it's obviously, he's got to go to martial law, right? Yeah, but here's the problem. The numbers are cratering for Trump They almost plunged to the levels of Democrats Who are going up Who are going up Oh not a lot Cara Well no with young men No there a few polls out that show really significant shifts, but go ahead. It's the worst cocktail in the world for democracy. And that is you have a fascist who doesn't have a credible opposition. I just think we look weak and feckless. I don't- I want you to focus on the fascist and not on the feckless for a minute. Well, I want to focus on being effective and what the fuck we actually need to do to push back on those fascists. And if you don't have an objective group of leaders emerging who are powerfully talking about creating a series of incentives to stop this bullshit, it doesn't matter. And just sitting around thinking, scolding them and saying, isn't this awful? And vote in 20, you know, 26. It's like, that's not exactly leadership. I want to see legislation of how we're going to track down and prosecute and indict and subpoena these people, including all the crypto scammers and a series of laws or proposals and legislation that does not give, that retroactively can unmask protection from pardons because they have been so hugely abused. Unless you give these people the sense that there's a non-zero probability that they will be held accountable for these actions, they're going to continue. And we don't have anyone with the moral authority right now or the charisma or the leadership to stand up and, quite frankly, rally America more than the images they're seeing on social media that just horrifies them. Anyway, moving on, the U.S. has started evacuating some troops from a base in Qatar ahead of a potential military conflict with Iran, though Trump says he's been told the killing in Iran has stopped. No executions are planned, indicating he may be moving away from taking military action. You know, I don't know what's going to happen here. There's all this weird betting happening by individuals, again, very similar to the Venezuelan invasion. There are insiders in the government making money off of these military actions and maybe influencing them too. That's another scary thing to think about. What do you imagine happening? And at the same time, Denmark, Greenland, and their NATO allies, including France and Germany, are increasing the military presence in and around Greenland. I can't believe I'm saying this. The move comes in the wake of a meeting at the White House between J.D. Vance, Marco Rubio, and foreign ministers at Denmark and Greenland. The Danish foreign ministers said the talks were constructive but fundamental disagreement remains ahead of the meeting Donald Trump posted on True Social that anything less than U control of Greenland is unacceptable Feels very nerve At the same time there was an interesting article I forget where it was that J Vance and Marco Rubio may be slow rolling this into the grass so that Trump, they don't want it to happen, this Greenland thing. And so they're just dragging it out so that Trump loses interest in the situation. But I don't know. It seems very strange to go to war with France? I mean, first off, there's a few things here. The potential for insider trading is just so insane on Polymarket and Calci right now. So Polymarket right now puts the likelihood that Khomeini will be out as Supreme Leader before 2027 at 63%. So if you're part of the inner circle, and by the way, there's reports that they are transferring, the senior leadership is transferring millions of dollars out of Iran, which is a very helpful sign because I think they need to get the hell out. But if you know, okay, on Wednesday, we're all headed to Moscow, easy way to make 50% on your money would be betting on one of these markets. So just be clear, folks, just as the casino has figured out the odds of these numerical games that on average over time, they win. When you don't have inside information on these things, eventually you're playing at a disadvantage. And the footnote here is the following, or the disclosure. I have not had any substantive conversations before I say that, because this is such a hot topic with anyone senior in the Israeli government. This is pure speculation on my part. But I talk a lot about Israel. My background's in brand. And I would consistently get calls from people in Israel, in the government, and in the private sector saying, what can we do about our brand? The brand Israel is so terrible around the world. And the general belief is, if you look at actually what we're doing relative to other wars, it's just being characterized unfairly. And we think a lot of it, we're shocked at how poorly our brand or how dramatically our brand has eroded. And I remember when I was a kid, the Israeli brand was one of the strongest brands in the world. And Tevi, Munich, they were just seen as the good guys. They are no longer seen as the good guys. And so they're constantly calling and asking, what can we do about the brand? I think the most brand accretive move that Israel could do, the biggest opportunity for Israel right now would be to go in and do what they did when they decided to take out their air defenses or something along the same lines. And that is when they decided to take out their air defenses and basically neuter Iran, who has been is when they decided to take out their air defenses and basically neuter Iran, who has been the primary sponsor of terror across the region for a couple of decades, they said, okay, they are basically, when our jets fly in, the surface-to-air missiles, the air defense systems are operated by this group of people, and there's six to eight people that need to give the order to fire missiles at alien aircraft. And you know what they did that day? They killed them. They The targeted assassinations within like an hour, six of the eight were dead. And then when the radar sent these F-15s flying in, there was no one to give the order. And I know that sounds really macabre and ugly, but in my opinion, these are murderers right now. I think if they were, it's clear that the Mossad has deeply penetrated soft assets at the highest level in Iran. But coordinated military strikes of centers of civilian suppression with the U.S. Air Force and on-the-ground soft assets that wreak havoc across what is a murderous IRGC right now, I think is not only geopolitically very smart over the long term, but I think would be very good for a brand Israel right now. Well, they've got a lot of things to do. Well, right. But I think this, you know what I found really heartening? These protests in New York where I see Iranian and flags of Israel, I actually find that quite encouraging to think that we might start- You saw Mamdani push back. You saw AOC push back on a lot of these more, you know, Hamas supporting stuff. They were very clear about what happened. I think one of the things is that with Iran, you and I both agree that Iran is a menacing country and also would be a really huge opportunity for democracy. The Islamic Republic. Yeah, it would be a thing. I think it'll be interesting to see. I think the juxtaposition here is Trump trying to create and foment protests by brutality here in this country and it brutalizing protesters and then supporting protesters in Iran. I think that's the obvious. Yeah I connect with that You right That true Zelensky in what happening But the idea of us going to war with France I mean or France having to send military things what an insane moment Like these are our friends These are our allies These are places we like to go, like we like to be part of. And so I think, you know, let me get the reason I think all this foreign policy chaos is conveniently distracting from the story Trump doesn't want to discuss, which again is Jeffrey Epstein. It's been nearly a month since the deadline for releasing the Epstein files came and went, and the Justice Department appears to be going nowhere close to making a full files public. I think they have 1% or something that you just said in a filing last week that it reviewed more, about 12,000 documents out of more than 2 million, incredible amount of documents. Democratic Representative Ro Khanna and Republican Representative Thomas Massey, who was really quite a badass these days, had filed a complaint with the federal judge. They're asking for the judge to appoint what they call a special master to force the DOJ to release the files. I actually spoke with Ro Khanna on the latest episode of On with Kara Swisher and asked him what happens next, because this is actually a process. They have gotten the law passed. The DOJ has to comply. The DOJ didn't comply. Now they have to do this. Let's listen. We will see some of these millions of documents because the Justice Department has said to the judge they're releasing them. The question is the quality of that and will they have excessive redactions. And then Thomas Massey and I are planning to introduce inherent contempt. Inherent contempt, if it passes the House, it just requires the House would fine Pam Bondi personally $10,000 a day for every document that she didn't release. Whether that passes and is enforced, the point is it's showing the crack in the MAGA base. Which is interesting. Let me just finish this up. That's actually doing something. Yes, exactly. Kudos to that person. Yes. And also they're trying to get this special master, which I think is another thing, which is probably the right thing to do here. Meanwhile, Bill and Hillary Clinton released a scathing letter to, you got to read this letter, to the House Oversight Committee this week saying they will not testify in the Epstein investigation. I will say Ro Khanna said they should testify. At the same time, they are having quite a good point, noting every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles, its people, no matter the consequences. For us, now is the time. The House Republicans are moving to hold both Clintons in contempt. Of course, they don't think Trump should testify, which is a good reason for the Clintons maybe not to. This continues to be the story that doesn go away And talk about what happening here because you know he is doing a lot of this to get the focus off of Epstein which is going to come out no matter what he does I mean this is not to be quashed at this point is my feeling Well, I just want to go back to Denmark for a moment, and I'll talk about Epstein. So my favorite meal in the world is In-N-Out, animal style, at the Sepulveda, the In-N-Out on Sepulveda near LAX. Good choice. Because what it means is I've just gotten to LA. I'm about to roll into the Beverly Hills Hotel, roll up to the bar, perhaps get my eye contact return from a lovely woman who perhaps might be from Russia. But it just signals a bunch of good things are about to happen here. And I'm about to roll with my buddy, Mike. I absolutely love LA. My second favorite meal is a latte and grapefruit and yogurt at Jack's White Frito, just sitting out there watching the world go by. I feel like I'm an author in, I don't know, 1920s rants. My third. Can I just note, if we were on the Newlywood game, I would know all this, but go ahead. I do know all this. My favorite one, Bob Eubanks, outstanding talk show host, asked, what is somewhere recently you've gone that was interesting? Or where do you want to go? Or where have you visited recently that you and your husband enjoyed? And she looked down and then she looked up and said, in the ass. And they didn't even bleep it out because they were so shocked. So my third favorite meal is anything from Chipotle. The fact that Chipotle is not a sponsor of everything I do is a crime against commerce. I can walk into Chipotle with a blindfold and I walk out with a smile on my face. Denmark is similar to me showing up with an AR-15 and zip ties and a military vest and saying, if you don't give me a burrito bowl with pork, extra guacamole and sour cream and brown rice for $14.73, I'm going to kill everyone here. And they'd say, well, sir. So this is Trump is the person who writes that. Right, sir, we would do this anyways. There's no need for guns. There's no need for military vests. There is absolutely an argument around why Greenland is strategic. It's a passage for not only all kinds of commerce, maritime commerce, but also for nuclear submarines. It would be a staging ground for any attack. It hugely important It also supposedly has about is it 17 or 12 of rare earth materials But all of this is ours All of it is or not even ours The whole point of the New World Order post was we said to nations rather than going on conquests try this thing called reciprocal mutually beneficial trade and commerce And it less expensive than firing up tanks We can have as many bases there as we want. We used to have, I think, 11 and we closed them down. And now we have one. We have one. They're like, they're 57,000 people. They, up until recently, really liked Americans and they liked the jobs. Like, sure, put a nuclear submarine base here, put a tracking, put a radar station, whatever you want. If you want to start, you want to come up with- Do trade deals around the minerals? Yeah, whatever you want, sir. We will give you your burrito bowl. You don't need to bring a gun into Chipotle. I like this Chipotle metaphor. I wasn't expecting it. You were wondering where I was going with that. I was, indeed. By the way, my new favorite restaurant in New York is a place called The Corner Store. Oh, my God. So many fabulous people there. The French dip. You heard it here. You're welcome. All right. Okay. Anyways, this makes no fucking sense. Like, the Epstein Files, there's no getting around it, Kara. It's probably President Clinton looks really bad here. This is what Roe noted, but nonetheless, it was a great fucking record. There's just no getting around here. But again, Roe is right, except for the following. And one of the reasons why one of the other pieces of material that's been stained indelibly by the Trump administration is that many of the activities testifying in front of Congress, not having your children trade in crypto and leverage the presidency to get multibillion dollar deals. There's actually few laws against them. What they are is they've been enforced by norms. And we've had norms in this country where if you're called before Congress, you go, regardless of who you are. Yes, you do. You don't act like a jackass. And because Trump has just waved the middle finger at so many norms. Well, which he did this week in Detroit, but go ahead. And because we have abdicated, as Barry Goldwater warned back in the late 60s and early 70s, because we have abdicated and, quite frankly, recklessly and ignorantly transferred so much power to the executive branch, that this guy has not only been able to blow through stop signs, he can mow over children in the crosswalk and say, yeah, fuck it, there's no law against it. And this is how society's... that this guy has not only been able to blow through stop signs, he can mow over children that this guy has not only been able to blow through stop signs, he can mow over children in the crosswalk and say, yeah, fuck it, there's no law against it. And this is how societies kind of just digress. So understandably and justifiably, the Clintons are saying, oh, these norms no longer apply. What's good for them is good for us. In any other administration, if the Clintons had been called before Congress, they would have said, absolutely, we'll come testify. They would show up. They're very smart. They're very well prepared. And they would have performed excellently. Instead, they want to make theater and connect Epstein more to Clinton and a Democrat than to... I don't know. I think they want to get arrested and show that Trump doesn't have to testify. I think that's precisely... They want to get arrested. I'm sorry. They want to get arrested. The Clintons. Yes. They want to make a spectacle of it. They want to make a spectacle and they want to point out that they want to have the Clintons testify, but not Trump. Have the Clintons testify, but not Trump. Yeah. Think about it. You know more about this than I do. Trump is not, the committee doesn't want Trump to testify. Why wouldn't they? Trump was closer to Epstein. I mean, on a long-term basis. But the committee is controlled by Republicans, no? No, I get that. But I'm just saying, they want to do this. I think they wouldn't write a letter that- The Clintons want to do this. Yes, the Clintons want to make some fucking noise. That's my guess here, if I had to guess. Because I think they both, they also noted they gave a lot of information. They've been cooperative, but they're not going to appear. essentially if Trump doesn't. And I think that's, I think people can grok that pretty clearly. You know what I mean? And I do think they want to be tried for this. I think that's what they're doing. I don't think William Jefferson Clinton wants to be tried under oath for anything to do with abstaining. You don't write a letter like that if you don't want. It's a dare. It's a dare. Well, they're both lawyers. My guess is the best lawyers in the world reviewed it, whether they signed it or not. Got it. But it's a dare. You wouldn't send a letter like that if you didn't want something to happen, if you didn't want to make some noise. Well, then you were smarter than me, so I defer to your strategy. Yeah, we'll see. Nonetheless, the Epstein files should be released. And what Trump is doing is distraction, distraction, distraction. There is something that he does not want to come out. I don't know if it's about him. It's definitely about his friends. So this is what's happening here. He's trying to get it out. And by the way, the people that want it out the most is the MAGA base. So and now me And now Scott And now the rest of the country So we see All right we gonna go to a quick break When we come back Paramount sues Warner Brothers Support for this show comes from Quince. People love to say new year, new me. And honestly, that sounds like a lot. No need to start from scratch, I say. Why don't we start with a new wardrobe and said from Quince. Quince has all the staples covered from soft Mongolian cashmere sweaters that feel like designer pieces without the markup to 100% silk tops and skirts for easy dressing up. To perfectly cut denim for everyday wear, their wardrobe essentials are crafted to last season after season. And like everything from Quince, each piece is made with premium materials in ethical, trusted factories, then priced far below what other luxury brands charge. I've gotten lots of items from Quince myself, and I'm just bringing out my down cape, which I wear for a very short time as it starts to get cold because it's really warm, It's cozy and it looks really good. It looks like I'm wearing a very fashionable blanket. I'm excited to be wearing it in the coming days as the weather gets colder and colder. Refresh your wardrobe with Quince. Don't wait. Go to quince.com slash pivot for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's q-u-i-n-c-e dot com slash pivot to get free shipping and 365-day returns. quince.com slash pivot. Support for this podcast and the following message is brought to you by E-Trade from Morgan Stanley. Now that E-Trade is part of Morgan Stanley, there's even more to love. Get the freedom to invest on your own with $0 commissions on stocks, options, ETFs, and mutual funds, plus account types for every investor. And when you're ready, speak with a pro to help guide you on your financial journey. Discover more ways to make the most of your money and get up to $1,000 when you open a brokerage account with a qualifying deposit today. Learn more at etrade.com slash offer. Terms and fees apply. Investing involves risks. Morgan Stanley, Smith Barney, LLC. Member SIPC. E-Trade is a business of Morgan Stanley. Today's show is brought to you by Vanguard. As we step into a new year, it's a perfect time for all the financial advisors out there to think about how to set up your clients for success. One way to do that is to level up your fixed income strategy. But bonds are tricky. The market is huge, rates shift, and risks hide in plain sight That why having a partner with scale and expertise matters Vanguard brings both Vanguard bonds are institutional quality Institutional quality isn a tagline it a commitment to your clients It means top products across the board The lineup includes over 80 bond funds. They're actively managed by a 200-person global squad of sector specialists, analysts, and traders. A lot of firms love to highlight their star portfolio managers, like it's about that one brilliant mind making all the magic happen. Vanguard's philosophy is a little different. They believe the best active strategies shouldn't be locked away with one person. They should be shared across the team. So if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, go see the record for yourself at Vanguard.com slash audio. That's Vanguard.com slash audio. All investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation, distributor. Scott, we're back with more news. The battle for Warner Brothers is continuing. And as Paramount continues to fall downstairs on this in doing dealmaking, Paramount filed a lawsuit against Warner Brothers and its CEO, David Zaslav, this week, trying to get them to turn over details of their sale process and the Netflix deal. Warner Brothers is calling the lawsuit meritless. Paramount also announced plans to nominate its own slate of directors to Warner Brothers Board to vote against the next deal. This is very typical in these fights. Netflix is making some moves ahead of its own, reportedly amending its offer to an all-cash deal, very savvy, which could speed up the process significantly. The stock is down, so it makes sense, and it makes it more attractive and gets that problem out of the way, the stock declining. I'd love you to talk about the board dynamics. I talked to Bill Cohen last night, and he was like, I don't understand why you would sugar, give the money, give $34 a share. You don't do vinegar here after doing so many stupid things in this deal. And actually, let me note, lengthening the timeframe, because Trump is, if martial law doesn't happen, Trump loses the House and the Senate. This deal is fucked for the paramount people. So the timeframe is really bad for them at this point. They're taking too long to get this, if they got their hands on this, Trump will be damaged by the time and unable to help them. But what do you think of this proxy strategy? You've been in the middle of these things a million times. Yeah, Bill's exactly right. At some point, I mean, they went through a long process and to Zaslav and their bankers credit, they got the number much higher than anyone including me had anticipated And at some point they have to say okay this is why we picking this deal You have to be able to economically justify it for shareholders There was justification for a lot of reasons that the Netflix is the superior bid And I have never been on a company that's been acquired or has acquired another company or has gone out of business where there's not lawsuits. I was on the board of Eddie Bauer when we declared bankruptcy. I was on- Really? You were on the board of Eddie Bauer? I forgot. Okay. Yeah, well, because I'm such a great outdoorsman. It just made sense. I can't see you hiking anyway. We're going on a hike someday. Go ahead. Anyways, but there's always lawsuits. So, folks, these guys don't scare easily. They just send a lot. The lawsuit's not going to have any merit. It's just, am I tied up or delay it? But it just adds another moving part to what is already going to be a complicated, messy situation. The only thing that talks here is they got to put $34 a share on the table. And dinero. Dinero. And not only that, it has to be the increase, the incremental offer has to be great enough to justify a potential breakup where I believe WBB would have to pay Netflix $2 billion. Yes, exactly. And also all those loan covenant things they have to get their nose out of. They have to let Warner Brothers do those loans. So the only way this happens is, they're not going to block this deal with lawsuits. The only way this happens is if Larry Ellison goes, whatever, I'm 81 fucking years old. I'm worth, I don't know, I think he's the third richest man in the world. I know he's less wealthy now. It went down, yeah. But that he just says, or Saudi money shows up and says, Larry, if you're willing to put in another 10, we'll put in another 10. And they show up with a 15% premium to the current offer. That's the only way the board is legally because of Revlon laws. I don't even think, it can't even be incremental, but it's a three or 5%. They would say the additional risk injected into the deal and the breakup fee means that this is a wash and we are just going with this dance partner as committed. There was a really interesting note. You and I both know V.B. Nevo. He's so funny. He's a funny little guy who is a very big investor in a lot of stuff. And he's very amusing on many levels and has been sort of a quiet whisper to lots of moguls. He was sitting next to David Zasloff at the Golden Globes, which was, and not with, and he's a Warner Brothers shareholder, and not with David Ellison, who apparently was seated in the back, but as he's a Warner Brothers shareholder, and the Golden Globes, which was, and not with, and he's a Warner Brothers shareholder, and not with David Ellison, who apparently was seated in the back, but as he's being insulted by the host of a show that's on his network, which I loved. It was really interesting. That was a really interesting, Zasloff sort of flexing a little bit there, having Vivi next to him. And I think this, I get lawsuits are typical, but it seems like not the way to do this. Like, just give them the money. I just, I keep going. And same thing that Bill says, give them the money. Just give them the money. That will work. Why aren't they giving them the money? Well, you mean offer more money. Yeah. Offer. Why? Best their bid, top their bid. So in 25, my big tech stock pick or my stock pick was Alphabet. This year it's Amazon. You know what my stock pick in 24 was? What? Warner Brothers. Oh, interesting. And at the end of the year, it was down 10%. I wish you had it now. Oh my gosh. Yeah. And I thought these assets will go. What will be interesting, and this is going to come back to my prediction, what will be interesting is I think all of these bankers and financiers figuring out they could in fact, they can in fact do whatever $100 billion is a 12-figure deal. Once this thing is done or has left the station, you know who they're going to turn their sights on? Disney. 100%. Disney. Disney's going to be put in play by somebody. Yeah. Yeah. And then I will be doing the lovely exit interview with Robert Iger. So, yeah, I agree. But it has to be done interestingly at the same time. Say Apple is the obvious candidate for that particular purchase. I agree. 100%. There's going to be a new CEO at Apple relatively soon and a new CEO at Disney. So those- Which do you think will come first? Disney. Huh. Yeah, I think you're right. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, Disney, I'm pretty sure I'm right. But Apple's coming. Tim Cook has been less there, from what I understand from people, and is starting to move away from it. I think he'll still be involved, no question. Both, well, maybe Iger will sail away on his beautiful ships. But I think that they're both preparing. So whoever the CEO is is going to have to helm this thing and therefore be part of the decision-making, right? That's presumably. You don't want to like, here you go. I just did a massive deal kind of thing. But in this case, just pay the money, Larry, or not. Like shit or get off the pot is kind of the situation here I think they should rename Disney to strip mining nostalgia God we so creative We going to put out a prequel a sequel an a a nyquil Let me just say, I'm going to push back on that. Both Disney and Apple have given us so, this group, these groups of people have given us so much great stuff over the many decades. It's okay that they aren't perfect all the time. No, and so is Ford Motor and Dow Chemical. That's a long, long time ago. Although, you know, as you know, I have a Chevy Bolt and I love it. Anyway, so what's the next move, Mr. Board Member, since I've never been on a board? Well, what people don't realize around board dynamics, and this is more relevant or impactful as it relates to Chairman Powell. Chairman Powell, you know, he's off. He's no longer the chairman as of May 2024. But you know who's in charge of the Fed? 26. 26. I'm sorry. May 2026. We're not in 2024 anymore. And God damn it. It's where does the time go, Kara? The cat's in the cradle. Where does the time go? You never played ball with me, Scott. Where does, oh my, oh wait, my, I need to pee. That's right, it's 2026. Okay. So. What's gonna happen next? The only time I feel like I don't need to pee is when I'm peeing. Okay. Anyways, just. And now the stream is so weak, it's like mist. You can be the anchor of CBS News with that line, but go ahead. Don't trust the experts. Hey, Billy Bob fucking Yahoo, what do you think? The audience of CBS is concerned with whether they can pee or not. What did 4chan tell you? What's going to happen here? We have to move on. Okay, so this is the thing. Why does Trump want Chairman Powell out so badly and to resign? Because while his chairmanship expires in three and a half months. Yes, you know. He remains on the board of governors. And he's influential. Until 28. Who do you think is going to control the fucking Fed next year? Chairman Powell. Chairman Powell. Because this is how boards work, Kara, or what I've learned. First, there's a quote unquote board meeting where we all sit around with the CEO in the room and we eat salad and everyone listens to themselves talk and we approve. We do whatever the fucking CEO suggested. And the only time a board matters is two. Two times. either hire and fire the CEO, or you decide if and when to sell the company. And usually when things get spicy, there's a second board meeting. And the second board meeting is the board members who matter meet usually in the parking lot after the board meeting and start talking Because the dynamic on a board is the following Everybody talks Everybody smart says their shit poses for the cameras It's a bunch of FIPS, formerly important people, saying intelligent things, you know, and then going back to their country club in Naples. And then usually two people speak, and everyone stops and listens and agrees with them. And the two people are usually the following. The largest shareholder, because the bottom line is they control the company, and especially if it's a private company and it might need more company, everyone kisses this guy's ass, and it's always a guy. And there's usually an ex-board member. What I mean by ex-board member is there's someone who, quite frankly, has proven themselves over the course of the last two, three, ten years on this board. It's just fucking smarter than everybody else. It has more gravitas. And when this person speaks, everyone just starts nodding their head. And guess who that person on the board of governors regarding interest rate decisions is going to be? The chair communicates to Congress. The chair is the visual figurehead. But at the end of the day, the people deciding if interest rates go up or down, it's the board of governors. And you can bet, regardless of who the chair is in June of this year, everyone will talk. And then Chairman Powell, probably one of the greatest economic minds in history, will say, yeah, these are all great points, but I think we should keep interest rates where you are. You can bet other board of governors are going to decide I'm with chairman or former chairman or Governor Powell right now. I got that. So here, let's go to Warner. So the board chair is a guy who used to be chief executive of Price Waters Cooper, right? And he's the one that's been on TV. saying there's, so him, he's a white guy, David Zasloff, Richard Fisher, independent director. Who was this guy? I don't even know who this guy is. Served as president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. So a big swinging. So that's him. I'm sure it's a very competent board. Right, okay, it is. I'm just saying, but who's that? It's Zasloff, right? Presumably is running the show here. Paul Gould. Deborah Lee. Oh, shoot. That's interesting. Zasloff has gained a tremendous amount of credibility because he's almost gotten everybody's money back. Yeah. Ken Lowe is on it. Wow. Anthony Noto's on that board. Ooh, I know a lot of this board really well. Wow. Oh, Jeffrey Yang's on this board. Malone. Malone. Malone the big swinging dick on this board Oh Bob Malone on this board Yeah Yeah Yeah He the guy that he listens to John Malone I sorry John Malone He the guy He arguably the brightest guy or one of the brightest minds in the history of media There's a couple of tech people. Jeff Yang, the venture capitalist. I've been that guy. Anthony Noto. I've been that guy. I've been the tech guy they bring on. Yeah. And over a while, just because we started a tech company doesn't mean we know how to implement tech at Disney. No, I get it. But there are a couple of interesting people. Anthony Noto was on it. Anton Levy is another person who's really interesting venture capital. They've got a lot of venture capitalists. Anyway. I don't know. The thing about Disney is they haven't been in layoffs, but Disney's announcing so many remakes that a bunch of original ideas have filed for unemployment. Oh, my God. That's good. Anyway. All right. We'll see what happens next. Pay up, kids. Let's pay up. So moving on. The FBI searched the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Nattinson on Wednesday, seizing laptops, a phone, and a smartwatch. Nattinson has spent the last three years covering the Trump administration's efforts to fire federal workers. The search is part of an investigation, they say, into a Maryland system administration accused of taking home classified intelligence report. It's a pretext, frankly. The Washington Post has been told neither Nattinson nor the outlet are the target of the investigation. The editor of the Washington Post, Matt Murray, did a terrific letter. It took a while to hear from the CEO, Will Lewis. Jeff Bezos has not said word one, and he's getting enormous amounts of criticism from readers remaining quiet in the hours following the news. I think the newsroom leaders have done the right thing and everything else. But this is a Trump administration trying to really go for the press at this point and going for their sources. There's no reason to take this woman's information on another investigation. and it's pretext is all it is. But Jeff Bezos not standing up is what, he's busy partying in Aspen, presumably, but another reason why he's a terrible owner for the Washington Post. You need to stand up at times like this. Yeah, I stopped listening about 30 seconds ago. No, stop it. It matters. You're just masturbating. You talk about democracy. Journalism, where's my vibrator? Not journalism. You don't, there's, we have rules in this country. Why does my stuff- Let's talk about Bob Iger. Hold on. No, why does my stuff not matter? Why does the president talk about this important of democracy? Are we married now? No, but I'm just saying, you talk about democracy. You don't touch me anymore. The press is an important part of this entire thing. You don't notice me. State media is being created, even as we speak. Jeff Bezos, if he wants to own this fantastic newspaper still, despite his best State media is being created, even as we speak. State media is being created, even as we speak. Jeff Bezos, if he wants to own this fantastic newspaper still, despite his best efforts to make it suck, should stand up. Come on. I'm trying to think of what's less relevant than CBS or The Washington Post. No, it is not. Relationship advice to the young men out there. Women don't want money and height. They want follow-up questions. No, I don't. Follow-up questions. No, no. Yes, they do. Women want follow-up questions. They want to be noticed. Let's talk about Bob Iger. Just let me get a few Bob Iger things back, and then you can go back to talking about how important The Washington Post is. No, bad. I'm not saying it's important. It's an important moment that owners should step up. No, no, no. It's terrible what's going on here. Oh, my goodness. You're like literally, when you're reading Pravda every day and getting updates from- I'm reading Pravda. I'm sure you'll enjoy that. Yeah, yeah. I'm just saying. I'm getting a tattoo that says Al Jazeera. No, no. Okay. Listen to me. I'm going to ignore you completely. An owner, the Grahams, Mrs. Graham went out on a fucking limb all the time for this country. And so did Don Graham. Yeah, to your point, I probably shouldn't be glib about it. The Washington Post reporter had developed, I guess, or it's reported well over a thousand confidential sources inside a variety of government agencies. So this is an attempt, not only an attempt to put a chill around the press, which is obviously totally contrary to everything America is supposed to value, but it's really meant to unmask sources and put a chill around anyone who talks to the press outside of normal propaganda channels. It really is upsetting. Federal agents, they've knocked down the door of the journalist. Her name is, as you referenced, Hannah Nathanson. And the feds show up at her house. They don't ask for a comment. They don't call her. They just kick down her door and take her computer and her phone. So, again, we just continue to find violations of the very principles that America was founded on. So, yeah, you're right. I shouldn't be glib about it. Look, this is a long line in media companies acquiescing to the government. Thank you. I get it. No, I'm thoughtful. CBS, whether it's CBS, whether it's making payoffs to him, whether it's Sherry Redstone, whether it's whatever. Jeff Bezos is a long line of shitty owners of media I agree We agree that he probably I think he probably agrees that he shouldn have owned or bought the Washington Post He should go and get his chin implants or whatever he wants but he shouldn own the But here's the thing. Bob Iger, you know, he doesn't ruin childhoods. He leases them back to you monthly. And also, he's not evil. He's worse. He's the kind of guy who can ruin something politely. No, no. You don't have a child. Disney is a wonderful, does wonderful stuff, as do many people. Anyway, you're not going to get the focus off of shitty Jeff Bezos. All right, Scott. We'll go on a quick break. You do not care for the things I care for. You know his big innovation was making you pay $27 to skip a line so you can stand in a different line? That's his innovation. When's the last time you were at Disney? Oh, so 364 days a year. I do not show up for my kids. And then my partner says, all right, bitch. So I take my, we haven't done it in a couple of years because now they want to go to Universal with their buddies and not have dad around. Yeah, that's a good point. In fact, the only time I would go, they want to go to Halloween night. I'm like, I'll go. And they're like, no, no, dad, you're not invited. I used to take all the kids and their friends to Disney once a year for a long time. Yeah. All right. But no longer. No, I haven't been in a while. Have you been in a while? I've been on a Disney crew. Oh, you've been with them? I've heard they're great. My kids want to do some cruise with their grandparents. It's endless soft serve. That's all I have to say. I've heard it's fantastic. It's very good. It's very well done. Yeah, I've heard it's great. I wanted to kill myself, but it's very well done. Well, that's called a cruise. Yes, exactly. It was endless soft serve. Actually, you're getting to that age now, though. No, I'm not going to do this. You're getting to that age. I don't like boats. I'm not a boat lady. And they have deals for you and your nurse. Okay. Anyway. All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break. When we come back, we'll talk about Apple and Google teaming up on AI. be testing, your designers and marketers are empowered to build and maximize your .com from day one. Changes to your Framer site go live to the web in seconds with one click without help from engineering So whether you want to launch a new site test a few landing pages or migrate your full Framer has programs for startups scale and large enterprises to make going from idea to live site as easy and fast as possible. Learn how you can get more out of your .com from a Framer specialist or get started building for free today at framer.com slash pivot for 30% off a Framer Pro annual plan. That's framer.com slash pivot for 30% off. Framer.com slash pivot. Rules and restrictions apply. tools that write product descriptions and headlines and help you edit product photos. Plus, Shopify gives you everything you need to sell online and in person. It's why millions of entrepreneurs have already made this leap from household names to first-time business owners just getting started. As you grow, Shopify grows with you. Handle more orders, expand to new markets, and do it all from the same dashboard. In 2026, stop waiting and start selling with Shopify. Sign up for your $1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com slash pivot. Go to shopify.com slash pivot. That's shopify.com slash pivot. Hear your first. This new year with Shopify by your side. Looking to create the bath you've always dreamed of without all the hassle? The Home Depot makes it easier. Shop fully styled rooms and curated collections. to bring your vision to life. Use digital tools to preview flooring and finishes in your space and get everything you need from tubs to tile delivered fast and priced right. The Home Depot, dream baths built here. Scott, we're back with more news. Apple and Google have announced a multi-year deal for Apple to base its AI products on technology developed by Google. Upcoming versions of Apple intelligence will be based on Gemini AI models powering Siri and other AI features Alphabet stock jumped on the news making it the fourth publicly traded company to be worth over trillion It interesting because they were mobbed up a little bit with OpenAI as you know for a little bit. And of course, there's many criticisms of Apple being behind. Meanwhile, several publishers, including our own Vox Media, the Atlantic, Penske Media, are suing Google for antitrust violations over its dominant ad tech business. There's a case happening too. Meta has named former Trump advisor Dina Powell McCormick to serve as president and vice chair. Powell McCormick served as Trump's deputy national security advisor during his first term. That's when I met her. But President Trump posted truth social congratulating Powell McCormick, calling it move a great choice by Mark Z. I'll comment on that at the end because I think she's highly competent and she used to work for Goldman Sachs. I want to leave that out. is married to Senator David McCormick of Pennsylvania. They're a power couple, obviously. But talk about the Google-Apple thing and the lawsuit. I think you know more about this than I do, Cara. I'm interested in your thoughts. I think, you know, Apple's been criticized for being behind in the AI stuff. They haven't been developing it. They've been losing staff in that way. Obviously, they decided not to participate in the money spending in this area that Google and others are doing. I think it makes sense. They have strong relationships over mapping. and search and everything else. And I think they may be, I don't know, they've gotten in trouble over the mapping and everything and the search, making them the default search. And so they may be just doing it again, right? If Google and Apple do this, I think they don't have the capabilities. And then Gemini has gotten a lot better, I have to say, even on Google search when I use it very rarely now. So they have to be mobbed up with an Apple because that's where people get their information. We'll see. I think it's in the light of that there is still an ad tech case by the federal government and then now this one. These people have complained about Google but never done anything, and now they've done it. I think this is exactly what they should do is sue them. I mean, I've always thought they should sue them in this regard. Google is on both sides of the ad trade and shouldn't be. And I do think the case that the government has is a strong one against Google. So any thoughts? Well, I thought Apple not entering into the capital wars of AI was a really deft move, because I thought they were going to pull a search and say, all right, you guys fight it out for search, and we'll just sequester access to the most valuable data. of AI was a really deft move because I thought they were going to pull a search and say, of AI was a really deft move because I thought they were going to pull a search and say, all right, you guys fight it out for search and we'll just sequester access to the most valuable billion consumers in the world that really are the only- And they did that with maps too. Right. They're really the only... So what is it? There are now more phone contracts than there are people on the planet. And a billion of those, or 1.2 billion of those, I think are iOS. And quite frankly, they're the only people that matter because they're the only people with money. And when you carry an Android phone, and I've said this for a long time, you're communicating to the world that things just quite haven't worked out for you. And so Apple and iOS is responsible for something like 80% of online commerce. They just spend, you can get a free phone. You can get an amazing phone and a free phone as long as it's Android. And these things cost three months salary in Hungary now, the iPhone. It's the ultimate signal as your worth as a mate is whether you have iOS or not. And so what they do is they know the value of that. And they said to Search, if you want to be put in front of the billion most powerful consumers in the world, you got to pay us not $5, not $10, but $20 billion a year. I thought they were going to have the same type of leverage with these LLMs. One of these LLMs was going to pay them a massive amount of money to be the default. Well, that may be the case here. We'll have to see. But it looks like it's sort of that the technology is so differentiated and they need it so much that Apple doesn't have the leverage, at least I thought, because what it looks like, it looks like they're going to actually pay, my understanding is pay Alphabet about a billion dollars to use Gemini. So the leverage has sort of switched back to the provider here, to the content as opposed to the distribution. What's interesting is why they've decided to support, I mean, if you look at the market share, there's a couple of things. I've been giving all these talks about AI. There's a couple of things about LLM market share that are just sort of interesting. It's likely and obvious and understandable that OpenAI would be seeding its 80, 70% share, that other people would be chipping away. Now it is. Google's come up and they've come down. And the two that have been eating share have been one, Gemini, and two, the LLMs, the open-weight LLMs coming out of China. Mm-hmm. That's exactly right. And it makes sense that- And that's it. By the way, that's it. The others are not growing. And by the way, Google Search still gets about 90 times the number of queries. Yeah Yeah Just on a different point They done a good job integrating AI They have Greg Shove the CEO of Section AI that upskills corporations for AI adoption has said something to me that I thought was really bang on He said, of the billion people out there that might use AI in the next couple of years, only 40 million are going to be willing to pay it. So really, open AI right now is one of two forks in the road. They either get massive, massive enterprise adoption or they go bankrupt because there's no way there's enough consumers willing to pay 20 bucks a month. I'm saying, let's go for Google. Which one are you going to be? So, anyways, but this is, I think this is a huge win for Alphabet. They're going to be put in front of the most valuable consumers in the world or the ones, you know, the ones that have money. And I would imagine the reason they're doing this is they're thinking that this is going to give an enormous boost to Gemini. So they either strategically have decided they don't want OpenAI as a viable competitor, and two, they've also, I wouldn't be surprised, people forget, these are people with enormous egos. And I say that in a good way. They are so, they will not spend time with their families, they will ignore their health because they want to win so badly and they want to be relevant in the world. And one way to do that is to be the CEO of a company and beat everybody else. I wouldn't be surprised, and I'm curious what your thoughts, if Tim Cook, quite frankly, is a little pissed off at Ive and this whole bromance of how, and the implication that OpenAI is going to build products. Interesting. Yeah. And so, and they've kind of, alphabet for Apple is the devil they know, but this is going to absolutely elevate or accelerate the market share of Gemini relative to open AI. I didn't have a lot of insight there. No, you had a lot of insight. I was just going to say, you actually did have insight. Let me, what about the lawsuit? Very quickly. I don't have a view on it. Yeah, well, they should sue them. They should sue them. They've been sucking away their value forever and doing it in a monopolistic way. So, yes. I'm up for any lawsuit against Big Tech at this point. Yeah, I like a lawsuit. Oh, and then, Dina, the way I read that, and I'm curious for you. I do know a lot about this, but go ahead. Yeah. Oh, see, my thing is that essentially Meta and Jensen and Juan all realize one thing. Quote, unquote, she's not in charge of partnerships with the government around data centers. She in charge of figuring out a way to elegantly get them the government to pay for it and ultimately bail them out Because their plans around data centers even they cannot finance So what is she there to do? Finance. Yeah, I think Dina is there to go to the Treasury Secretary and the Commerce Secretary. You know why it makes sense for the government to issue bonds and backstop $4 trillion in debt for us? Because it'll grow the economy. I mean, I think she's there with the world's most elegant, biggest fucking hat to try and get Trump to justify and announce that he's going to backstop. You know, you know, Scott. So you agree? Oh, I think so. I think she's there. She's a goldmine. I mean, they leave out. A lot of the reaction was, oh, it's a sop to Trump. I don't think that's the case at all here. I think she's actually a very deft networker. She left the Trump administration rather early and has a very good reputation as a networker. She was at Goldman Sachs, very tight with those people, was there for a long time. She knows everybody and actually across all party lines, which is really interesting. And so I think Meta doesn't have much capital experience in figuring out how to capitalize these things, these data centers, and has been very far behind. The other thing is, you know, I think the stop to Trump is too easy, is too easy. I think she's the right person, especially if Trump starts to lose power. She is not. She is. She has been close. Everyone has to who's participating has to be have a relationship with Trump. But it's not she hasn't gone over the edge in the way that some others have. So there's that. I think she has some credibility with Democrats from what I can glean. She's now the head of the she's now the head of the big tech pack and she will orchestrate the largest bailout for tech since COVID. Possibly. Or else figure out how to capitalize this stuff, right? How to get the money for it. Which is a bailout if it comes from the government. Yeah. So the other thing I think she has to avoid being is Sheryl Sandberg too, right? Like seen as that way. And so- I don't think she will though, unless she's going to like claim, you know, well, let me just be honest. Unless she's going to pretend to promote gender equality while depressing teens all over the world. She will not. She's actually, interestingly, she's very close to Nikki Haley. She's definitely a Republican, a very interesting background. But I agree with you. It's all about the data centers. Good for you, Scott, not knowing everything. There you go. Financing and Give me the money to start a paper And actually honestly I love Aspen I love Aspen As much as I hate to comment Mark Zabriskie is a very sharp choice One of the better business minds of the last century Yeah, I got to say, he's made the right choice here. He's made a lot of bad choices. This one's a good one for him. And it's too easy to say it's just a suck up to Trump. It's not. It's absolutely not. It's a suck up to everybody. All right, Scott, one more quick break. We'll be back for predictions. What turns unrest into a revolution and where could it lead? The big open question is whether this set of protests that are currently underway is the end or the beginning of the end of this third phase of sort of modern governance when it comes to Iran, the end of clerical rule. I'm Jake Sullivan. And I'm John Feiner. And we're the hosts of The Long Game, a weekly national security podcast. This week, we cover the massive nationwide protests in Iran and the U.S. response. The episode's out now. Search for and follow The Long Game wherever you get your podcasts. Some of this video coming out of Minneapolis is telling a story about the surge of ICE agents that started last week after Rene Good was killed. Another controversial video has emerged of ICE. It turns out the people being arrested were U.S. citizens. These are observers making sure that kids can walk home from school without being taken apart by the horrible Gestapo that we have here. A group of men approached a woman at a bus stop, pulled her aside, and then walked her into a vehicle. The polling is also telling a story. Support for ICE is dropping. And more Americans than ever before, 46%, told Economist YouGov pollsters they want ICE abolished. Meanwhile, the messaging from the White House is that ICE has immunity. So what does that mean for the people, some of them citizens, that ICE agents are dragging out of cars and workplaces and off of streets around Minneapolis? That's on Today Explained. We air every weekday. Is the American dream still possible? And it shouldn't be a wake up that if you work hard, play by the rules, we're going to make the American dream accessible and affordable to you. You're not going to struggle. You're going to strive to achieve something. For those who think that the system is rigged, breaking news. You're not paranoid. I'm Preet Bharara. In this week, former Chicago mayor and U.S. ambassador to Japan, Rahm Emanuel, joins me to break down the affordability crisis, education, why Trump supporters Preet Bharara. Preet Bharara. And this week, former Chicago mayor and U.S. ambassador to Japan, Rahm Emanuel, joins me to break down the affordability crisis, education, why Trump supporters feel betrayed, and what a Rahm Emanuel presidential campaign might look like. The episode is out now. Search and follow Stay Tuned with Preet wherever you get your podcasts. Okay, Scott, Let's hear a prediction. The only thing I want to say is I thought that XAI is disabled the ability for Grok to create sexualized images of real people, including children, following a wide backlash. It's pretty easy to generate those deep things, by the way. But I think I got it right that he was going to give up, even though he was pretending he wasn't on this stuff. I think he's going to continue to double down. That's my prediction. because, like, I don't know what else to say. This guy is a really heinous character, and he thinks equating free speech with sexualization of children is really where we are right now with him. And that Apple, I don't think Apple and Google will do anything about it, which they should have before this. But he's backed off, so there you have it. Maybe they did behind the scenes. I don't know. Go ahead. Yeah, so we've been talking about Warner Brothers' discovery. It's about to go into boring mode where they just try and get the CFIUS and antitrust and all the lawsuits and reviews for the next 18 or 24 months. The next thing that's going to preoccupy us is there's going to be most likely an activist because it's so bad, but Disney's going to be put in play. The leadership transition here is uncertain. Iger says he plans to retire, but succession issues have traditionally invited shareholder activism. And a moment of a leadership change is an opportunity for an activist to kind to pop up and play CEO. Have you been called Scott Galloway? There you go. Yeah. I was literally the world's worst athlete in the history of UCLA. And I imagine I'm like the world's worst activist. They'll get pressure from activist investor, whether it's Nelson. You know, this thing, basically it's at its... It's flat. In a market that's tripled or quadrupled, it's flat over the last 10 years. And you look at this IP in these parks, there very few companies that have more assets than Disney right now Nobody has it Warner Warner would be the second but Disney top You right There just something about I mean look at Disney These parks these cruises are singular and Netflix can't spin up a Disney park in two, three decades. It would take 50 years. Obviously the IP here, Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar, theme parks, ESPN. Why flat then? Why is it flat then? Because they haven't been able to grow earnings. And you can't get around it. You'd have to argue it's been poorly managed. It's like, how on earth is Intel worth less than it was 25 years ago when it was the leader in microchips? And also, the biggest reason why Disney will be put into play, it comes from that movie, what was it called? Wall Street, where Charlie Sheen is saying, why did you have to go after this company? Why do you want to break this? And he finally, this is a shit. And he goes, because it's breakable. And Disney is breakable in the sense that unlike most media companies, it has very modest anti-takeover or poison pill provisions. It has an annually elected board. It doesn't have a staggered board. Once you get on a board and you said, you know, we're smarter than everybody else, including our shareholders, we'll start. I was on the board of Gateway Computer and we finally found a fucking bidder to buy that Joey Bag of Donuts company. And all the board members sat around and said, including the guy who went on to be the governor of Michigan, they tried to put in a poison pill. And they're like, we just want you to come in through the front door. And I'm like, all the Yahoo, farm speak just means you think you're smarter than shareholders. You now think you own this company as opposed to shareholders. Disney has not done that. That means a bidder only needs to persuade the majority of shareholders to replace directors, which can make hostile approaches- He's been through this. He has been through a few hostels, as you know, with Ike Parmutter and a whole bunch of people. And also, the other thing that I think's lined up here is, I think people look at Disney and go, yeah, fucking A. Disney, someone should go in there and acquire 2% and be an activist. And that's probably what happens here. But what Warner Brothers has probably shown the market that, oh, if you find the right billionaire and the right the right pockets of money in the Gulf and the right bankers really hungry for fees, you can assemble this type of money. And there's so much money on the sidelines. Yeah I don think they let the Saudis into this one It going to be an apple It going to be someone who doesn need the Saudi help I just trying to think Disney an American brand I mean Warner is too but Disney There's no way. They're opening a Disney in the Gulf, right? They are, but they're not going to let the Saudis own Disney. Well, I don't know. I think all you need to do is give Mickey Mouse a beard and a morality police. Okay. I think it's apple. It's got to be apple. If they had it set. By the way, can I make another prediction besides these? They just have to change the name of the ride from It's a Small World to something like It's a Small World and more restricted that we live in. I think I was at this dinner and a pharma guy was there. And as I was sitting here, I thought, because they're doing pharma and tech are doing all these deals together, whether it's open AI or all of them are doing deals, these health deals. deals. I think big tech is going to go after pharma next and own. Oh, that's super interesting. I was like, oh, I looked at him and he's going on and on about Trump or something. I said, you know what? You're going to get owned by tech. You're the next frontier. They're doing the media stuff, but it's not peanuts compared to you. And actually, in terms of doing great things, AI combined with pharma is an amazing, huge opportunity. See, I think actually the golf owning Disney is a bigger fit than you think, especially with the Star Wars franchise, Desert Planets, Dynasties, Family Drama. Done. Fits perfectly. Okay. They can have the golf. They're not getting Disney. So they can have golf and tennis or whatever the hell, but not Disney. It's going to be hard. That'll be made. There'll be a lot of pushback on that. Well, I like that. They'd have to ban gay days. they'd rebrand them as Imagination Maintenance Closures. Also, that's on Warner. My Hedgerobbler is on Warner. Anyway, on HBO. Anyways, my prediction is Disney is about to be the object of our obsession. It's most likely going to be an activist because it still is a very big pill to swallow. But they have good for them. And I hate poison pill provisions and anything that shifts accountability and authority from shareholders to a bunch of people who think they're smarter than everyone else on a board because they show up for a Cobb salad and get paid $300,000 a year called boards of directors. You would not believe how arrogant we become when we go on boards I really don think I going to go on a board this year That one of my little goals All right board people I interested Anyway that a great prediction but you will and may steal my idea of tech buying big pharma Okay. But I just, to come to your defense, I thought of you and you'll like this because it makes you look good, but you got a ton of shit on one of the social platforms. Someone insulted me about my take on masculinity and then someone weighed in and said, yeah, and we should have known this. he partners with Kara Swisher, who's been a total, total corporate shill for big tech. And I thought immediately, I've been on the nominating committee. When you go on a board and they don't like you, i.e. Scott Galloway, they put you on the stupidest committee. They put you on the nominating and governance committee. And the one thing the nominating and governance, and I always end up on a compensation committee because it's the worst fucking committee, or the absolute worst is the audit committee because you have to do real work. But anyways, on the nominating governance committee, the thing you do is find new directors when directors roll off. And good boards roll, you know, kick, politely have a conversation with his golf buddy who's been there 24 years. Maybe it's time for you to move on, or we talk to their nurse. But anyways, I'm not exaggerating. I know exactly what they're looking for in directors. You check every fucking box, literally and figuratively, except you're unafraid and you're a pain in the ass. Pain in the ass. If you were not speaking truth to power and totally unafraid, I'm not exaggerating. I think you'd be the chairman of fucking OpenAI or Tesla right now. So the notion, I think your abrasive truth, kind of tell truth to power has cost you, Cara, hundreds of millions of dollars. So for anyone on any social media platform, they can say they don't like you. They can say you're arrogant. There's some truth. Whatever. Fine. But to say that you are a corporate shill. I know. They do that. I don't know what the opposite of that is. It's because I was close to Elon and wasn't. And they just can't. These are these sort of censorious fucks. And if you'd stayed close to him and kissed his ass, you'd be on the board of Tesla and worth $200 million. I'd be running CBS News. That's what would be happening. And I'd be standing at your place in Soho. Yeah, exactly. I know. I'm aware. I'm aware. But most of the criticism I get is from being with you. That's good to know. Board people, come find me. Yeah, okay. Anyway, we don't care that we're shrill or dislikable or anything else. We don't care. We want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business tech or whatever's on your mind. Go to nymag.com slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 888- or dislikeable or anything else. or dislikeable or anything else. We don't care. We want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business tech or whatever's on your mind. Go to nymag.com slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 855-51-PIVOT. Yes, we do not care because we like ourselves and we like each other. That's the way it's going to go. You're not going to split us up. We are going to do that ourselves. Okay, that's the show. Thanks for listening to Pivot and be sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. We'll be back next week. Scott, read us out. Today's show was produced by Lara Naiman, Zoe Marcus, and Taylor Griffin. Ernie Intertide engineered this episode. Manolo Moreno edited the video. Thanks also to Drew Burrows, Ms. Severa, and Dan Chalon. Nishat Kourouas, Vox Media's executive producer of podcasts. Make sure to follow Pivot on your favorite podcast platform. Thank you for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media. You can subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com slash pod. We'll be back next week for another breakdown of all things tech and business. you