Katie Britt's SOTU Response, SVB Collapse Revisited, and Guest Savannah Guthrie

Kara Swisher: AI agents are getting pretty impressive. You might not even realize you're listening to one right now. We work 24/7 to resolve customer inquiries. No hold music, no canned answers, no frustration. Visit sierra.ai to learn more.

Kara Swisher: Not all journalism is the same. Take The Guardian. Our coverage has something unique: fierce independence. Nobody owns us or tells us what we can and can't say. So we're free to report the whole picture. We connect what's happening in Washington to the rest of the globe, expose corruption wherever we find it, and give fresh perspective on everything from wellness and soccer to culture, the climate, and more. Read, watch, and listen to The Guardian for free at theguardian.com.

Kara Swisher: Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher. I got to admit it. I'm crazy attracted to Senator Britt. Oh, my God. I'm doing ketamine therapy this afternoon. I have my intake. And they said, is there anything you're trying to figure out? And I'm like, well, I'm very attracted to Senator Britt. And it's deeply disturbing. I want to unpack that. I mean, I have this fantasy where she comes into my kitchen and just starts saying, "You should be ashamed of yourself" over and over. Is that wrong? Oh. Is that wrong?

Scott Galloway: That's wrong.

Kara Swisher: It was so ridiculous, but I'm very drawn to her.

Scott Galloway: Oh, Scott. And by the way, for those of you who are going to accuse me of being a sexist, I objectify Gavin Newsom all the time.

Kara Swisher: You do. That's fair. But nonetheless, anyway, Katie Britt is a senator from Alabama, the junior senator who did a disastrous—

Scott Galloway: Could you get over that?

Kara Swisher: I couldn't. I couldn't. It was weird. And it's become such a viral sensation and people are having a great—

Scott Galloway: Sometimes I love the internet, not because they're dunking on her, but they're so creative in the dunkery. It's really funny. It's witty. All these people do. And I have to say, SNL with Scarlett Johansson did a bang-up job.

[Audio clip from SNL plays] Scarlett Johansson (as Katie Britt): Good evening, America. My name is Katie Britt. And I have the honor of serving the great people of Alabama. But tonight I'll be auditioning for the part of Scary Mom. And I'll be performing an original monologue called, "This Country is Hell." You see, I'm not just a senator. I'm a wife, a mother, and the craziest bitch in the Target parking lot.

Kara Swisher: We got to find out who's the young freak from the GOP comms or from the RNC that was like directing it. Go, okay, now be disgusted. Now be seductive. Now disgusted. Seductive. Disgusted.

Scott Galloway: I agree. I agree. It was really, it was such a miss. It was such a miss.

Kara Swisher: But yes, she's weirdly compelling. Isn't she? She's weirdly—

Scott Galloway: She's better than Tommy Tuberville.

Kara Swisher: Yes, because one of the best things about the Johansson thing is when she had the teacup, like she was from Get Out, like she did the teacup thing. She had that vibe. And their weird taste in cabinetry, the whole thing just blew my mind.

Scott Galloway: That's not their kitchen. Come on, give me a break. That was nobody's kitchen.

Kara Swisher: No, that was nobody's. Someone chose that kitchen?

Scott Galloway: Maybe it was their kitchen, but they took away everything that's in a kitchen.

Kara Swisher: I think it was her kitchen.

Scott Galloway: Well, it needs some things in it. Like, nobody has children in that kitchen, I can tell you that.

Kara Swisher: I'll come to my kitchen. She's one fucked-up sexy beast, I'll tell you that. Don't you agree? In a weird way, we're kind of riding the same bus.

Scott Galloway: No, I do not. She's not.

Kara Swisher: A little bit drawn to her?

Scott Galloway: No, no, no. A little bit drawn? No, not at all. She's the really creepy lesbian you're trying to avoid in the bar. That's really what it is. I'm just telling you.

Kara Swisher: Wow. That would be the most interesting season of The L Word. If she—

Scott Galloway: That would be. That would be pretty interesting. They had something like that.

Kara Swisher: I would tune in for that.

Scott Galloway: I think they had a plot.

Kara Swisher: I would tune in for that.

Scott Galloway: Okay.

Kara Swisher: Well, I'll talk to my friend Eileen Chaykin and see if she can help you. We're two minutes in. First name drop.

Scott Galloway: Okay. Go on. Get on with the rest of the show.

Kara Swisher: Well, she is my friend. I don't know what to tell you. There's nothing. The facts are the lesbians all know the lesbians. Speaking of which, we were just at South by Southwest. Do you miss me? We spent a little quality time together. Did you like it? I'm being very serious now. This South by Southwest.

Scott Galloway: I love—

Kara Swisher: It's fun. It was fun. I love spending time with you. The panels were great. The audiences were great. I thought that folks who run it here did a fantastic job. People were, I mean, I think you were in your element.

Scott Galloway: I had three different people ask me to sign your book, which was kind of humiliating.

Kara Swisher: What did you write? What did you write in my book?

Scott Galloway: I just wrote, "Don't read this." No, I said, I write the same thing in every book I sign. I write "Life is So Rich, Scott," and I put the date.

Kara Swisher: Oh, that's nice. But yeah, your book was freaking everywhere. Everywhere. Anyway, what did you think?

Scott Galloway: I loved it. I thought it was really well done. I've always liked South by Southwest. I don't love CES. I don't like a lot of these industry gatherings. But I've always loved—not just the food is so good. Austin is an amazing city. I'm not a fan of Texas, the whole of Texas, and how they govern themselves. But I do love Austin.

Kara Swisher: Well, it's like you got that out. Otherwise, we might think you like Texas, Carol.

Scott Galloway: Well, I don't.

Kara Swisher: Well, anyway, I love Austin is what I love. And I think it's got a real joy of life kind of thing going on. Very creative everywhere you go. Someone was telling me as I was walking, it's like you wish other cities were, like big cities. It's very hot in the summer. That's one of the bad things. But when it says South by Southwest, it was actually somewhat cold. But we did a lot of things. We had a great time. We did a live Pivot that was really fun. It's going to air on Wednesday, I think. Extra bonus episode was super fun. The crowd was enthusiastic. But not just that. It was like we did a panel at a women's, the Female Quotient together. That was nice. We did a lot of couple things together, which was nice.

Scott Galloway: Well, you invited all the women's stuff now. I love that stuff because they're, I think, unduly and unnaturally self-conscious about being perceived as people that don't like men. They love men. Whenever I go to these things, they could be nicer and more receptive. And the nicest compliment I got is when I went to, I think it was She Media. They said half our audience was men. That never happens. And they got to hear important information about research and breast cancer. And so they were really thoughtful and grateful.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, that was lovely. Did they give you the vibrator?

Scott Galloway: I did get the vibrator. I did get the—I don't know if they were trying to—I don't know if they'd spoken to someone or people I'd had sex with and felt like—

Kara Swisher: I got several.

Scott Galloway: I'm sure you did, Kara.

Kara Swisher: I got several. I'm sure you did. Yeah, I did. I did. I don't know why it was an interest. I've never gotten a vibrator in a swag bag. I'm just saying it was weird. It was an interest. That was the gift this year at South by Southwest.

Scott Galloway: What are you going to do with it?

Kara Swisher: Oh, that's a dangerous question to ask me, Kara.

Scott Galloway: Let's just pretend you didn't ask that.

Kara Swisher: There's a butt plug in there if you're interested.

Scott Galloway: Oh yeah, there's a butt plug and a—what do you call it? A dick ring or whatever it is. I don't know.

Kara Swisher: Oh, you got that.

Scott Galloway: No, I like my sex very vanilla and very disappointing. So I bring both those things.

Kara Swisher: Okay, good. I just, I've never gotten that. I always get like, you always get like this, the energy soda or whatever, or et cetera, whatever. I got so many vibrators this year. It's kind of interesting. My phone case or something. Sex is back.

Scott Galloway: Yeah. Sex is back. Sex is back. Young people need to have more sex. There's a dearth of sex amongst young people.

Kara Swisher: Dearth of sex. That is true. That is true. In any case, we will have that bonus episode for you on Wednesday that we taped live on stage where we talked about the looming TikTok ban and moms against social media addiction. And be sure to check out all our special episodes from South by Southwest on Pivot on Prof G Feed. Oh, and I saw Megan and Harry. That was a highlight. They sat next to me at the Soho House. I think I told you, it really changed my view of him. I used to think he was a fucking idiot and now I get it.

Scott Galloway: I have behaved much more irrationally for women who are much less hot than her. She is scorching hot. She's like, Kara, she is Senator Britt hot.

Kara Swisher: Oh, Senator Britt hot, come on.

Scott Galloway: She, no, but seriously, she's beautiful. She's so much more beautiful than Senator Britt.

Kara Swisher: She's beautiful. We're going to objectify women, as apparently we're doing. Oh, my God.

Scott Galloway: I'm like, I get it. All is forgiven, Harry. I get it. I get it.

Kara Swisher: You get it?

Scott Galloway: I totally get it. I get it.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, we do have a lot to talk about today. We're going to do a round robin of all kinds of things, including Elon Musk's role in the 2024 election and what's happening with regulation one year after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. Remember that? Plus, our friend of Pivot today is today's show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie, who has a new book, "Mostly What God Does: Reflections on Seeking and Finding His Love Everywhere." I thought it'd be good for you because you talk about faith in a different way, but we'll get to her in a minute. But I think you have a very deep faith streak in you. That's my feeling.

Scott Galloway: I do. I know you say you're an atheist, but I think you're much more spiritual than I have ever been. And you will be today when you do the ketamine.

Kara Swisher: We're going to get to the Oscars in a second, but what are you doing in this ketamine therapy, speaking of touching the face of God?

Scott Galloway: The honest answer is I don't know. A friend of mine is an investor in ketamine clinics. I've always been very curious about it. So he heard I was going to be in South by. So he's sending me to this place called Cougar. And I had an onboarding with him yesterday.

Kara Swisher: Cougar.

Scott Galloway: No, I did Cougar last night at the bar here at the Proper. There's a lot of that here. But the—I don't know where I got that. Yeah, I'm doing ketamine therapy. And I think I've been, I'm like you. I've never—I've always—it's like Burning Man for me. I always plan to do it and then I back out. We'll see if I back out this time. I'm supposed to be in an hour and a half. I want to know what it's like and I don't want to do it. In all seriousness, I have such a wonderful life and I have really wonderful, deep, meaningful relationships. And you and I have both said the same thing, that whatever demons are there, we've managed to suppress them.

Kara Swisher: Yes, we have.

Scott Galloway: And I'm just not sure I need to let them out.

Kara Swisher: Well, they're out a lot, Scott. I'm sorry. Yours are out quite a bit. They dance around a lot. I think people are aware. I'm going to talk about them. Yeah, are you in the other? Yeah, I think it'll be good for you. They bring the egg salad.

Scott Galloway: They bring the egg salad. Let me just say, I'd really like you to do it because I'd like you to tell me what it's like because I don't want to do it. But I might do it someday. But it's interesting. It's in a controlled—for people who don't know, it's in a controlled environment with a therapist.

Kara Swisher: Oh, yeah, it's clinical. Clinical. And it'll be interesting to see how you feel. Have you ever done ketamine?

Scott Galloway: No, I don't. I've been turned off of it because, quite frankly, I just know so many rich private equity and tech bros that no longer drink, they just do ketamine. And I just been—it's like when I was in college, Kara, I've never done cocaine. When I was kicked in the face playing soccer in high school, I used to get terrible bloody noses. So I thought, okay, cocaine's probably not the right drug for me. But more than that, it was imprinted on me very early. A lot of my fraternity brothers used to use cocaine to try and get women. Women seem to have a special relationship with jewelry and cocaine. Very sexist, but I also think true.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, this is the 80s, but go ahead.

Scott Galloway: And all the guys I knew that were really into cocaine were guys who had no game or no action themselves and used it as a means of trying to attract women who are really into cocaine. And I also don't like it because it's a very private, it's not a community drug. When we used to smoke pot, it was like, everybody smoke. Hey, do you want some? And we'd laugh. Cocaine felt like, oh, let's go in the—let me find a woman who likes cocaine and go into the bathroom and do blow with her. And it always really turned me off. And I felt the same way very early about ketamine. All these stories about these tech bros thinking there's a free lunch around some sort of drug, and I've never done it.

Kara Swisher: Yeah. All right. Well, this will be interesting. I have never done either of them. I've never done cocaine. People thought I did cocaine.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, I know. You don't even drink. I can't imagine how you put up with the environment here without drinking.

Kara Swisher: I don't know. I had a delightful cranberry juice last night.

Scott Galloway: My favorite moment of South by Southwest as we're talking about this, Kara, we did this fun game, and Kara was the moderator, and she stood up on a couch, and she started to look unstable and like she was going to fall. And I'm not exaggerating. Every business person at Vox screamed and leapt to try and save her. They saw their entire future flash before her eyes. It was like they were Clint Eastwood in the Line of Fire. They would have taken a bullet for you.

Kara Swisher: That's true. But you know who stabilized me? A pair of lesbians. Did you notice sitting? They were great. They're really great.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, they're influencers. They're brought by my friend, Joe. I met them. The cooking one.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, they're nice. The Persian lesbian. They're fantastic. They're my new friends. They just bought a house in the Hollywood Hills.

Scott Galloway: Yes, exactly. You're hanging with the lesbians, too.

Kara Swisher: Lesbians buy homes? That's so fascinating.

Scott Galloway: Anyway, let's get to the thing. One thing we missed last night. Next, they're going to want to have kids.

Kara Swisher: Yes, I know. It's crazy. Okay. We missed the Oscars last night. I watched bits and pieces of it because we were at this party, which was kind of a baller time to run a party. But Oppenheimer won Best Picture at the Oscars. Other highlights of the night. It actually was apparently a very good show, and it looked pretty good. And Ryan Gosling performed "I'm Just Ken" from Barbie, joined by Slash. It looked fantastic. I saw it in the video. John Cena walked on stage wearing nothing but the winner envelope for Best Costume 50 years after the infamous Oscar streakers incident. And he's a handsome man. And of course, host Jimmy Kimmel, reading the review of his performance he found online, which was by former President Donald Trump, happening in real time, was very funny. Let's listen.

[Audio clip from the Oscars plays] Jimmy Kimmel: I just got a review. "And has there ever been a worse host than Jimmy Kimmel at the Oscars? His opening was that of a less than average person trying too hard to be something which he is not and never can be. Get rid of Kimmel and perhaps replace him with another washed up but cheap ABC talent, George Slopinopoulos. He would make everybody on stage look bigger, stronger, and more glamorous. Blah, blah, blah. Make America great again." Okay, now, see if you can guess which former president just posted that on Twitter. Anyone? No? Well, thank you, President Trump. Thank you for watching. I'm surprised you're still watching. Isn't it past your jail time?

Kara Swisher: Scott, did you watch?

Scott Galloway: I thought it was really good. Everything I saw was adorable and delightful. It looked like a real tight show. I heard rave reviews on it. Look, 19 million people watched it, 55 million people watched it in 1998. But the shampoo effect of—I think I'm like most people. I didn't watch it, but I've been seeing clips of it. So it's still relevant. It's just the difficulty, and I spoke to the board or the Oscars or whatever they call it, the Academy of—the challenge they face is how do they—they're still relevant, but how do they monetize that relevance? Because when their deal is up, and I think Disney, they're just not going to have nearly the bargaining power when they were negotiating that deal with three times the audience. But it's still relevant. And what it does is, you love the movie The Holdovers, but I saw that the woman won Best Supporting Actress, I think, for it. And it immediately reminded me, oh, I have to watch that. So it does have relevance and influence. But it was good. It was good. But you're right. It's not going in the right direction. And I'm not sure what they can do about it. They'll just have to hold it and just have lesser people there, I guess.

Kara Swisher: I guess. And get less money for it. And just let them have their party. I don't know anything else but that. Another thing, President Biden, someone who did a little better, brought in $10 million in 24 hours after the State of the Union. For context, the Biden campaign and affiliated Democratic allies raised $42 million for the whole month of January. Really incredible, just incredible, an incredible win because he looked like he's not dead because he's not dead. You were right. The expectations were so low that he surprised the upside. Remind me, have you heard these stories? And supposedly this has happened several times where people go to the morgue to identify mom and she sits up and everyone is suitably and justifiably freaked out.

Scott Galloway: Yeah. No, I do not hear those stories, but okay. Dead mom and mom sits up. That's kind of what happened here. We're like, okay, everyone was sort of expecting him to drool or fall down and he didn't. He was good.

Kara Swisher: Or maybe he perhaps wasn't as bad as you thought he was, and that was ginned up by the right wing. Maybe you got taken advantage of by people, and he wasn't as bad as people think he was.

Scott Galloway: Look, after seeing Senator Britt, I'm down for being taken advantage of by crazy right wing people.

Kara Swisher: Okay, anyway.

Scott Galloway: Abuse me. Do with me what you will.

Kara Swisher: I shall, I shall. You poor cabinet aesthetic. You saucy minx.

Scott Galloway: You're a saucy minx.

Kara Swisher: Oh, gosh. That's what you need to say to me. I thought he did great.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, he did great. And I think he's really pushed it back, and he's actually leaning into, oh, I'm old. Yeah, I'm old and making fun of it and doing really funny things.

Kara Swisher: I think smart. You own it. You own it. You own it. That's how he's going to win this. I mean, if you watch both those things, I don't know. The clips are relevant. It's kind of like the Academy Awards. I don't think a lot of people tuned into the State of the Union.

Scott Galloway: They did. That's not true.

Kara Swisher: But it was just a general—you take away certain themes and the themes you take away is he's old, but he's still alive and she's crazy. I mean, it was sort of like, yeah, we're old, but they're crazy. They're crazy. And also, they managed to get to talk about the craziness and stuff like that, including making a mistake. And let me go into this. You did talk about Senator Katie Britt's Republican response to the State of the Union. Britt spoke in this dramatic fashion, mocked by Scarlett Johansson. Besides the dramatics, Britt mentioned a woman she'd spoken to at the U.S.-Mexico border who had been sex trafficked, except the story she referenced happened under George W. Bush, with John M. Katz first pointed out. It just was a loser night for the Republicans. I know these things are just minute by minute, but it was not a good—it sort of reset everything and the numbers shifted dramatically. It was really interesting. I think you're going to see it in the polls. But Biden, everyone's like, oh, he's okay. Like that. And then it was—you know what I mean? That was what he needed to do, as we said he needed to do. He has to keep doing it and being out there and being in social media and all kinds of social media, but he certainly—he did himself a favor and they did themselves no favors whatsoever by lying and being crazy.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, that was—you know, I don't know. We have a bias. If you're going to talk about that stuff, this is pretty sensitive stuff that obviously—and only that the woman didn't get a heads up that they were going to reference her. And it happened during the Bush administration, I think. It just—I don't know. It just—more than anything, okay, misinformation is bad, but I think worse than that, you've got to have your shit buttoned up when you're talking about things like that. It's one thing to lie about the economy or whatever, but I don't know. I found it really just tacky. Just sort of, okay, you're going to weaponize this woman's suffering and get it wrong.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I agree. I agree. This is how they tell stories. This is what Trump does all the time. It just doesn't work for other people. Trump lies almost continuously. Everything comes out of his mouth. You have to fact check. But in this case, it doesn't work for them all. The rest of them can't do it because I think people catch them and they look stupid.

Scott Galloway: Speaking of stupid and weird, Kate Middleton, the princess of Wales, is apologizing for any confusion caused by a family picture that several photo agencies retracted after concerns of digital manipulation. She wrote, like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. The princess said in her apology, posted on social media, but it brought more confusion. The photo was released over the weekend on Mother's Day in the UK, seemingly to dispel some recent conspiracy theories about her whereabouts after her surgery. She hasn't been seen. She's been seen a little bit and doesn't look great, actually. And the picture didn't look like she looked in a paparazzi picture caught of her. But conspiracy theories continued on social media, continued noting things that appeared to be off about the photo, including hand position, leaf alignment, that the grass was green and it's winter in Britain and the trees had leaves on them. I'm sure you've been very concerned about Kate Middleton, but here you are in Britain. It's not good. And the British press apparently just knew it, that it had some editing in it. I don't know. It seems like they're doing themselves a huge disservice and sort of keeping this story alive. Just that something's really wrong with her or she's divorcing him. That's the other rumor, whatever, because she didn't have her rings on her fingers in the picture. Anyway, what do you think?

Kara Swisher: I like both of them. I think it's not a—I don't know. I wouldn't describe it as a hard job. I'd describe it as a strange job. And I think they do their best. I think they're both real class acts. I think they take their loyalty to their family and to the crown really seriously. I think he's going to be a great king at some point. I like her. To be honest, Kara, I didn't see the big deal. I wondered how much editing and touch-ups were done for Tim Cook's cover on Vanity Fair. I didn't see the big deal here.

Scott Galloway: I see the big deal in that there's already these conspirators. Everyone's like, now I'm a Kate Middleton truther. You know what I mean? I just think it creates undue. King Charles has been sick. It's the lack of disclosure. And then doing something that was a little bit—you would never put out any kind of photo. So now you have AP and Reuters saying your photo stinks. That's not like—it's not like Aunt Julie in the Midwest studying every bit of it. It creates conspiracy theories by being so—you cannot be information sneaky in this environment, especially in the AI environment. And here you had like Harry and Meghan saying these people lie all the time. You just don't realize it. And the press goes along with it. And this is what they did. But here they did. They're obviously not telling the full truth about what's going on with her. And she does have a right to privacy. But she kind of doesn't have a right to privacy in a weird way. I mean, she has a right to it. But she doesn't. That's just not where she lives. Part of the job. You get to wear jewels and everyone. I mean, there's just a downside. And she signed up for it.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I just think it was ridiculous. Touching up a picture is crazy. Because in today's world, you can't do that. You can't do it. I mean—

Scott Galloway: I really hope that Kate and William—I mean, I'm a fan. I'm a fan of the crown or whatever you want to call it, the royal family. I think they're great for Britain. I think they're a great symbol. I think they're great for tourism. I think they create more economic value and people seem to enjoy them. If Kate and William were to split up, I think that would be really damaging. I mean, you got the other brother who took off with a 40-year-old woman who's been divorced once who claims that the family of 90-year-old white people are racist. And then if they get divorced—oh gosh, I think it would be like, okay, what the royal—it's not really a family anymore. It's just the royals. Anyway, I like them. I hope that's not true. I hope that there are—

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I don't know. I just think they're creating undue. They're going to have to come clean now of these mistakes. And this amateur thing, even her statement, they just keep getting caught in stupid little lies. And therefore, it creates—they have to understand how conspiracy theories work. And they're literally doing a favor for every conspiracy theorist that you try to bat down. But in this case, I'm like, what did happen? And I'm not that interested in her.

Scott Galloway: Yeah, but the age-old adage, and it's really hard to listen to, but you know it's true. It's never the infraction. It's the cover-up that gets you in trouble.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, there's no infraction. If she's sick, she's sick. If they're having marital problems, they're having marital problems. It doesn't—I don't know. But everyone fills in the white space is your favorite expression. Everyone fills in the white space now.

Scott Galloway: The guy who put on a master class in crisis management around poor behavior was David Letterman. Do you remember he was sleeping with one of the younger staff?

Kara Swisher: Yeah.

Scott Galloway: And rather than cover up and lie about it, he's like, okay. He went on a show.

Kara Swisher: Because he was getting blackmailed.

Scott Galloway: He went on a show. Yeah, but a lot of people get blackmailed and still continue to lie about it.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, no, I know that.

Scott Galloway: He went on a show and admitted it and apologized for it. And everyone—the thing about Americans is Americans love to forgive. They do. And as long as you—

Kara Swisher: See Donald Trump.

Scott Galloway: Go ahead. As long as you kind of come clean and apologize and seem somewhat and overcorrect, if you will, I think Americans love to forgive. What they don't like is when you consistently lie because they sense something's up and then everyone turns into a personal private investigator.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, they do. Now you can. The people spend—I looked at some of these Kate Middleton sites. They are like—honestly, they could all be reporters. They're like, and this, and this was here, and this. I was like, wow.

Scott Galloway: Well, it's weird. It's weird. And when it's done right, it's amazing when people do those group investigative things. But this seems a lot of energy on something terrible, like just not of our business, but it is our business.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, let's go on a quick break. When we come back, we'll look at the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank one year later, and we'll speak with a friend of Pivot, Savannah Guthrie.

[Ad break]

Kara Swisher: From Pushkin Industries, I'm Jonathan Goldstein, and Heavyweight is back. The new season is bigger than ever. Bigger hopes. "I keep waiting for this moment when he says, Mom, I get it. I'm sorry." Bigger dreams. "Tom Hanks wants to meet with you. This is a real chance." And bigger heartbreaks. "I thought it would be my movie moment and maybe he would even whisper in my ear, 'I've always been in love with you.'" Check out new episodes of Heavyweight on Apple Podcasts.

[Ad break]

Kara Swisher: Person to person, it's the same connection that's needed in business. And it can be the hardest part about B2B marketing, finding the right people, making the right connections. But instead of spending hours and hours scavenging social media feeds, you can just tap LinkedIn ads to reach the right professionals. According to LinkedIn, they have grown to a network of over 1 billion professionals, making it stand apart from other ad buys. You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company roles, seniority, skills, and company revenue, giving you all the professionals you need to reach in one place. So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience and start targeting the right professionals only on LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn will even give you $100 credit on your next campaign so you can try it for yourself. Just go to linkedin.com slash pivotpod. That's linkedin.com slash pivotpod. Terms and conditions apply. Only on LinkedIn ads.

[Ad break]

Kara Swisher: Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start? Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin, or what that clunking sound from your dryer is? With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top-rated pros, see price estimates, and read reviews all on the app. Download today.

Kara Swisher: Scott, we're back. It's been a year since the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. Remember that?

Kara Swisher: We saw one of the largest bank runs in U.S. history with customers trying to withdraw $42 billion in a single day. For full disclosure, Vox was also caught up in it, too. So was your co-host, Kara. Oh, Scott Galloway was also caught up in it. Two other banks, First Republic and Signature Bank, also collapsed in SVB's wake. After government intervention and some major restructuring, Silicon Valley Bank is now operating as a subsidiary of First Citizens Bank. One year later, regulation is slowly materializing after months of floating fixes. The Fed and other regulators could unveil new rules this spring.

Kara Swisher: Talk about this because it sort of went away with whether regional banks were vulnerable. And this was a particularly unusual regional bank in a lot of ways because it was industry specific. But just this last week, New York Community Bank accepted a billion dollar rescue package from the former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, among others, to stay afloat. So what do you think about this?

Scott Galloway: Well, I'll talk about what went down. I think there's a lot here. I remember getting emails from people, from VCs and investors and CEOs, companies I'm involved with. And they said, have you heard about this? Should we take our money out? And I said, it's up to you, but give me a minute. And I, cause I didn't know what's going on. I remember it was at dinner and I went and I went to the FDIC has a website. And do you know how many depositors have lost money? None. Zero. Zero.

Scott Galloway: So I went back and I said, look, I don't, you have to do what you're going to do here, but what I really don't like is all these people, all these small men in search of a balcony on Twitter claiming there's going to be lines around the corner of banks, creating this incel panic room so they can get attention. And here's the thing: they did. They moved in, they shorted up, and they ring-fenced the contagion.

Scott Galloway: Now, going meta, it indicates a few things. One, there are certain externalities and risks we haven't fully contemplated or registered based on the fluidity of capital flows or ease of access to certain things based on everyone having a supercomputer in their pocket. Usually when there was a bank run, you had the evening or the weekend to calm people down, or they had to wait in line for an hour to get their money out. But now within two minutes, you can transfer all your money to JP Morgan, which a lot of people did. And you can start a bank run on Twitter.

Kara Swisher: No longer. I don't think any longer it could. That went out of, I don't think it could now, but go ahead.

Scott Galloway: The other thing, I mean, a few things here. One, the most recent bank earnings showed every bank is struggling except for the one that could start loaning out money at higher interest rates than they pay, and that is Jamie Dimon. He is hands down the biggest beneficiary of SVB's collapse. If you look at JP Morgan's earnings, they were champagne and cocaine, and overnight, they just had this massive additional capital base that Janet Yellen gave them for free, and a ton of capital washed into JP Morgan because they thought, I don't want to deal with this shit. I'm just going to go to the biggest, most secure bank that is now too big to fail, which is JP Morgan.

Scott Galloway: And it also indicates that we should be more thoughtful, something I'm very worried about. And I think it's the same problem that caused this bank run as president with something else. My roommate, my junior at UCLA, had an addictive personality and he liked to gamble. And this really shady guy would show up and it was his bookie. And I remember thinking, I would never do this shit. This guy is just, this feels so sketchy. But now it's on your phone and Charles Barkley and Kevin Hart are telling you to do it. And I think we're going to see a massive increase in young men who are much more risk-aggressive, engaging in gambling.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, it is. It's absolutely. Gaming has always been, it's like video games. They're there and they're bigger than you think and they're in the similar genre. Yeah, I agree with you. But just to close the loop, I take the other side of this. All the calls for regulation and everything, I think this was an example of the banking system and its regulation working almost perfectly. Because when Senator Warren calls for one-to-one banking being a boring business, it's like, okay, you realize, Senator Warren, you're going to dramatically slow the economy. Because the miracle of the modern US banking system is the following. $100 deposited into a bank, as long as they all don't ask for it back at the same time, and it's different people with different time horizons, the bank can turn around and loan out $120 or $130 to consumers and small businesses who can buy more cars, build more plants. And because they have different time horizons and different needs, they don't all ask for it back at the same time. So effectively, our economy is run on leverage that is very low cost and results in an ability to essentially grow the economy much faster. If you don't have on what I'll call irregular, but consistent basis, a few bank failures, it means you're not aggressive about loaning out money.

Scott Galloway: But they still could have – they moved. They did a great job. I 100% agree.

Kara Swisher: But they have to still prop up these local banks and find a way to not let this become one single giant mega banks. That's, I think, the area they should focus on is mega banks.

Scott Galloway: But they have FDIC insurance. I get it.

Kara Swisher: But too much consolidation is an issue. There should be a series of regional banks. Agreed. Agreed. That's where they need to focus.

Kara Swisher: And anyway, former President Donald Trump reportedly wants Elon Musk to speak at the GOP convention. According to CNBC, this follows Musk and Trump's recent meeting down in Florida, along with some Republican donors. Trump is probably seeking cash infusion for his campaign. Trump was just on CNBC a little while ago. And when asked about Elon, he said, I've liked him. We obviously had opposing views on a minor subject called electric cars. Musk said he's not going to give money to Trump or Biden's campaigns, but he hasn't ruled out giving to PACs.

Kara Swisher: And speaking of that, interestingly, a story I think you should look at this New York Times investigation by David Fahrenthold and Ryan Mack. His multi-billion dollar charitable foundation has been haphazard and largely self-serving. The Times dug into the Musk Foundation and covered a number of donations that had links to Elon, his employees or his businesses. Musk's philanthropy also makes him eligible for large tax breaks. And his foundation has failed in recent years to give away the bare minimum required for these tax breaks. We only have a second. This is all I have to say is that he needs Trump and Trump needs him in that for money or somehow.

Scott Galloway: So he's whatever, if he speaks or whatever, I think he'll do. He'll be nuts. I don't think they should. I should think about not having him because he could say anything. And the second, although he can be very funny too and charming. So if the charming one shows up, it could be very helpful. As the foundation, what a surprise. He's self-serving and non-generous. The richest man in the world is not very generous with his philanthropy, and he'll do it so that it suits him. I think he's a lock. I think he's going to speak there. He has an enormous following. And he comes across as, okay, he supposedly voted for Biden and Hillary, but now he's on board with Trump. And there's rumors that Musk guaranteed his bond. So I think this makes a lot of sense.

Kara Swisher: Let me put it this way. Crazier, less popular people have spoken at both conventions.

Scott Galloway: Yeah. Peter Thiel was there.

Kara Swisher: Yeah. I think they'll probably pick him out. I think it's, you never know what he's, I think it's a big risk. It's like the Katie Britt thing. It's a risk because he could do anything. As the philanthropy, of course, this is what he's doing. He could hardly, hardly cares about this stuff. He just did it for, he's not doing it to help people like other people are.

Kara Swisher: In any case, enough Elon Musk. Apparently he had a rave. Did you go to that there at Austin?

Scott Galloway: I was not invited.

Kara Swisher: I was not invited either. Anyway, all right. Oh, well, too bad.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, let's bring in our friend of Pivot. Savannah Guthrie is the co-anchor of the Today Show and NBC News' chief legal correspondent. She's also the author of *Mostly What God Does: Reflections on Seeking and Finding His Love Everywhere*. I want to be clear, this is the real Savannah Guthrie we're talking to, not the AI or deepfake Savannah Guthrie. We'll talk about that in a minute. But I first want to talk about the impetus for the book, because when you told me about it, we text from time to time, you said, this is not what you think it's going to be. And you were almost apologetic. It was interesting. And that this would surprise people who know you as Savannah Guthrie, journalist, interviewer, you do tough interviews, you're on the Today Show, you're very well known. You're talking about your faith here. Talk to me about what the impetus was, because I was surprised, actually. I had no idea.

Savannah Guthrie: I know. I was surprised, too. And I mean, almost apologetic is just my zone. You know, that's where I live. That's the emotional space I inhabit for most of my day. But, you know, honestly, my faith has been important to me. It always has been. And all my close friends and my colleagues, everyone knows that. So I don't mean that they would be surprised, but more that I was surprised that it was something I wanted to write about or put out there publicly. Not because I was ashamed, but because it's so personal. It's so vulnerable. I mean, if you're going to write a book about faith and it is in any way authentic, then you're more or less putting your heart out there. And in this world, which I don't have to remind you, that's really terrifying. And so for me to put it out there like that, I'm certainly not holding myself up as any kind of model of behavior or anything. I'm not any kind of theologian or biblical scholar. It's just reflections from a real person, a real life, learning more from disappointments and setbacks than any triumph, that's for sure.

Kara Swisher: Let's leave aside the performative people who talk about religion, who do it for some other reason. You were a quiet, faithful person, as most people are. You know what I mean? People, they don't, do you think people are scared? That's scared and ashamed to talk about it, but you don't, because it's so personal. That's why you didn't want it. You don't talk about it or publicly, I guess.

Savannah Guthrie: Yeah, publicly. I mean, I have talked about it, you know, from time to time, which is how this opportunity to write about it came to me. You know, I've certainly never run from it, but, you know, I think people are quiet about their faith because for one thing, isn't the mantra, you're not supposed to talk about religion or politics.

Kara Swisher: Well, I mean, one of those has to hold.

Savannah Guthrie: Well, yes, it is, but that doesn't happen.

Kara Swisher: That doesn't happen.

Savannah Guthrie: Yes, it doesn't. But also because I'm not out here trying to proselytize or persuade. The truth of the matter is I never thought I would write a book about God. I never thought I'd write any book. And I didn't want to, really. I was happy to just have this be something personal to me. But when the opportunity came up, I found myself not able to say the immediate no I've said to every other offer of any kind of writing whatsoever. And the reason was because it seemed intriguing. It seemed challenging. It seemed terrifying. And it's the subject I'm most passionate and interested in. And I'm always telling, you know, especially young producers or interns or people that have ever asked me for advice, I always say, you know, get out of your comfort zone. Anything interesting you do in your life will be outside your comfort zone. It's on the other side of a big risk that you take. And it had been a while since I had taken my own advice. And so I thought, I'm going to try.

Kara Swisher: By the way, it's a bestseller, so people are responding to it. In the book, you write about some deeply personal topics, including the loss of your father who died when you were teenagers. You also talk about your husband and your kids and how you see both marriage and parenthood as metaphors for relationships with God. Talk a little bit about this, why you wrote it the way you did.

Savannah Guthrie: Well, the big revelation is mostly what God does. That's the title of the book. And the rest of the sentence is mostly what God does is love you. And I grew up in the church. I had a traditional kind of Baptist upbringing. And there's a lot about that that I still love and treasure. But there was also a lot of guilt and shame and rules and a sense for me of always failing, never measuring up, and always kind of wondering what this looming God figure might have thought of me. And through a life of, again, more mistakes than anything else, what I came to realize is that mostly what God is doing at any given time is loving us. It comes actually from Scripture. It comes from a verse in Ephesians that was retranslated by a scholar named Eugene Peterson. And the verse goes, watch what God does, and you do it too, the way children learn proper behavior from their parents. Mostly what God does is love you. When I read that sentence years and years ago, it was a radical reframing of how I thought about God rather than this angry taskmaster scolding or being disappointed or having a bill of particulars of all the ways we and all of humanity fails. Mostly what God is doing is loving you. That's true for me. It's true for you. It's even true for Scott. I'm teasing.

Savannah Guthrie: But the thing is, is that I wrote about it in the terms of parenthood, because that was another moment where when I had kids, I was in my 40s. I was so lucky to get to have kids at that late date long after I thought I had screwed up everything and would never have my chance. And to have a child is truly the most, I think, the closest we'll ever get to understanding how God relates to us. You know, we love our kids. We're amazed by our kids. We delight in our kids. We relish their little accomplishments. We delight in their milestones. We not only love them, we often like them. We adore them. Well, that's how God feels about every human being. And I'm not making this up.

Kara Swisher: Yes, I know. There are other versions of it. Scott, why don't you come in here?

Scott Galloway: By the way, you know God is dog spelled backwards. So dog. There you go. Savannah, it's really nice to meet you.

Savannah Guthrie: Hi, Scott.

Scott Galloway: First off, congratulations on your success. I think this is a brave book for someone in your position to write because you're just subjecting yourself to a lot of scrutiny and your vulnerability, and I can see why it's a bestseller. So acknowledging that, I love what you've written. I love what David Brooks has written about the importance of community and how much comfort religion gives people, and that there's definitely a hole in American society where people are having trouble finding each other and the agency of something bigger than them. And religion plays an incredibly important role. And as a devout atheist, I also want to acknowledge that I think we would probably benefit from an upsurge in religious institutions in America.

Scott Galloway: Having said that, I worry, or what would you do to provide comfort to people when you say most of what God does? What I see mostly God being used for, quite frankly, right now is oftentimes good people do good things, bad people do bad things. When good people do horrendous things, usually God is at the center or some form of their vision of God. And what I see in America is the religion and legislation that the line is being blurred and being used for, quite frankly, incredible misogyny, incredible discrimination. So what would you do to provide comfort to people that recognize the importance that church plays, but see increasingly that God is being, if you will, weaponized?

Savannah Guthrie: Well, I understand those sentiments. I live in the real world too. And I write a lot about doubt in the book. And the doubt isn't, does God exist? The crucible of doubt for any deeply thinking faithful person is, where is God? Why would a good God allow unmerited suffering?

Kara Swisher: Yeah, and you say this. You say this in one chapter you write, "Waking Each Morning to an Overnight News Summary," which often has headline after headline of bad news you wrote. It feels like taking 20 punches to the gut in rapid succession.

Savannah Guthrie: Yeah. And I mean, I hear and understand exactly what Scott is laying out. I mean, again, I live in this world too. I would only say that what you're describing has more to do with humans than it does to do with God. And I understand, but I would say, try to get back to the source material. Go back to basics. Look for God for yourself. Look within. I mean, looking out in the world, whether, I mean, frankly, any human institution and every human, even our most treasured and most devout or most faithful or most moral humans we have, they're still human. And this is, in my faith view, this is not the world that God intended. We live in a broken world. And there's just no getting around that. And P.S., I don't have the answers to that in this little yellow book. I don't. The only thing I say is that I believe that God yearns to engage with us even on our doubts, even with our doubts. In fact, I think that's part of faith. I think doubt is kind of faith being worked out. It's not an exception to faith. It's an aspect of faith. Indifference and apathy, now that might get you a little more opposite of faith. So I understand all those doubts, and I don't try to run from them. I try to explain how I have dealt with them either personally with my own setbacks or the world that I see that breaks my heart every single day.

Kara Swisher: What do you say to—he just said he's a devout atheist, right? Scott just said I happen to be more of an agnostic because I don't know. And every now and then—

Scott Galloway: Which means you're a closeted atheist.

Kara Swisher: No, I'm not. No, I'm not, because I've been literally walking by churches recently and thinking I'd like to go in. I agree. I don't know why. I don't know. I don't. And I don't go in, by the way.

Scott Galloway: Community.

Kara Swisher: Maybe. I'm sorry. I don't mean to answer for you.

Scott Galloway: Okay. I don't know. I don't know.

Kara Swisher: No, it's something else. I don't know what it is. It's not. I don't want to see more people, Scott. That's something I want to do the opposite of. But what, it's true, Savannah. Who are you writing for? Are you writing to reach those people? Or what's the goal here for you?

Savannah Guthrie: I mean, the book is not for any particular person. I really mean that it is not in any way proselytizing. If it's persuasive, that's not what it's intended to do. It's a description of a relationship with God, and I hope that it's ultimately appealing, because I think God is quite compelling. So I write about, there's a chapter called "The Fragrance of the Gospel," right, which is a line from Scripture. But I say, you know, the idea is it's a fragrance, right? It's not a stench. It's not an odor. It's not the person next to you wearing too much perfume. It's a fragrance. I hope that a life that is lived with recognition that God loves every human heart, yourself, and every human you see on the street, I hope that life carries a fragrance that is appealing and compelling. But no, I'm not trying to write to any particular person. I'm trying to write to every particular person who cares to pick up this book. And in a lot of ways, I'm writing to myself because this encouragement is something I need all the time. I mean, I still need to be reminded that God loves me, that even more radically, that God could like me. I mean, if you could let that in, if you could really let it in, even for a moment, it's pretty transformative. But it's not the kind of thing that you learn once and then it stands for all time. It's like when you get married, you don't say, I love you, sweetie. And then in 30 years, you're like, remember I told you on a wedding day? No, you are in it every single day. And you have to continue to seek that connection. And that's how I think about faith as well.

Scott Galloway: Scott, by the way, I love you, Scott.

Kara Swisher: Thank you for saying that. Should I leave?

Scott Galloway: No, no, it's okay. So I'm asking this question generally for an answer, not as a comment. What advice, I know you have kids, I have 13 and 16-year-old boys, and I genuinely struggle with the role that I should play in determining what the role religion should play in their life. As someone who believes at some point I'll look into their eyes, and I believe our relationship will come to an end when I die. I also recognize as someone who spent a lot of time in temples and churches that there is something wonderful for kids about being involved in a religious institution, but I struggle with how to incorporate it in a thoughtful way.

Scott Galloway: Anyways, what advice would you have for someone who, you know, buys into the institutions, not necessarily the lineage, and see some of the danger. And quite frankly, if I woke up one day and my kid was super religious, I got to be honest with you, Savannah, I would be heartbroken. But at the same time, I realized the value it can play in their lives. And I want to incorporate it in a thoughtful way. What advice would you have for parents that feel the same way?

Savannah Guthrie: Yeah. Well, I mean, I'm definitely with, you asked me, but I definitely do not present myself as somebody who could give any kind of advice on parenting as I'm just struggling along blindly myself. But I'll tell you what I do. My husband is Jewish. We have an interfaith household. What I have decided, and this is a little different because I do carry a deep faith within me. So what I try to do is share that with my kids. And yes, to a certain extent, you're talking about religious institutions. I go to church. I've always belonged to a religious institution, but to me, I don't let the religious institutions ruin God for me. I try to know God for myself, know Jesus for Himself through scriptures, through prayer, through personal interaction. And of our religious institutions, which are imperfect as all humans are, I try to take with grace the best that they have to offer and then have grace with their failings.

Savannah Guthrie: But what I try to do is teach my kids about the God that I know, and not just in a way of dragging them to church, although I do. My sister says in our growing up, she said, God was the sixth member of our family. And what she meant by that was we were always kind of in conversation with God or about God. And when my kids have a problem, I might introduce God into the topic. This is easier for me because I believe in God and you don't. But I think that's how I try to do it. And if you don't have those feelings, you feel strongly that's different. But if somebody was wondering, they might just say, especially with a 13 and 16-year-old, I have no doubt your boys are quite smart as you are. It's okay if you want to investigate that a little bit. And you have to understand that faith, it's intellectual, but it's also spiritual and emotional, we're on multidimensional realms here, okay? So, you know, you can't, nobody can sit here and prove it to you and give you a set of facts, even if they gave you incontrovertible facts that wouldn't be enough. Faith is, in the end, a leap. And I, if I had older kids, I think that's what I'd say to them. My little kids, you know, these, they're seven and nine now, as they start to ask questions, my view is, I told them what I know, they will choose for themselves their faith or no faith at all. And that will be their choice. I only know my responsibility is to expose them to the God that I know.

Kara Swisher: How do you incorporate the Jew, your husband being Jewish? How do you incorporate? Because there's a lot of families like this. There's like my family, my wife is Jewish, but we haven't done anything at all. And I wouldn't bring them to church. Although with my older kids, what my ex-wife did was she took them to all different churches all the time. Like she would go to a temple, she would go to a Sikh temple, she would go to a Baptist. She brought them to a lot. Unitarian was where she tended to zero out on, but she took them to a lot of places, which I thought was kind of a great idea.

Savannah Guthrie: I couldn't, I didn't. I think, I mean, look, my view is sort of give God some access to their hearts and let him do the rest. I mean, why do we act like we're going to, what we say is somehow going to be what they end up believing anyway. So I feel a responsibility because I do feel my faith so strongly that I want to share with them what I know. My husband, he comes from a Jewish tradition, and he shares his traditions, and we let those all live alongside each other. Now look, we don't have to get into chapter and verse why at some point, although there's so much in common between our faiths, why at some point there may be questions and a conflict. And when that day comes, I hope that we can answer it with as much love, understanding, grace, and humility as possible for all we know and all we don't know.

Savannah Guthrie: But, you know, my kids used to go, they don't go to this school anymore, but it wasn't a religious church, a religious school, but it had religious, it was an old religious school, but a hundred years later in New York City, it didn't. But they still had chapel every week. And what I loved about it was, you know, the chapel had nothing religious in it, but it was space and time for something other than the here and now. For something other than what's right in front of you. So maybe it's a long-winded way of getting to something of an answer, Scott, which is to, however you do it, to leave a little space. And if God chooses to enter that space, well, won't you be lucky, even though, Scott, you'll be in despair?

Scott Galloway: Why should anything change? Why should anything change?

Kara Swisher: Let me just tell you, Savannah, you don't know that, but one of the things Scott's doing this afternoon, he's going for a ketamine therapy session. He's trying it for the first time. So this is going to fuck him up. This is going to be good.

Scott Galloway: I may see God. There's a decent chance I'm going to see God in about 60 minutes.

Savannah Guthrie: Well, you know what, Scott? My big view, and I write about this in the book, is God speaks our language. You open your heart and you give a little access point, then let God do the rest. He's God. You're not.

Kara Swisher: Yes. As you were sitting here thinking, the reason I am interested, I grew up Catholic, and they hated gay people. They did. They did. They did. And that was what made me reject it so strongly. And I thought they were horrible in so many ways, the people that ran the church, including around sexual assault and stuff. But one of the things that I think I'm attracted to is the quiet. It's so quiet in there. And I think you're right. Being quiet is a very difficult thing these days.

Kara Swisher: But I do have to ask you about these AI-generated companion workbooks being sold to a company. Your book, mine are—there's full books of Kara Swisher with really creepy-looking Kara Swisher faces on them.

Scott Galloway: You look hot. Stop it. You look hot in those photos.

Kara Swisher: It's not going there right now. With Savannah, we have a nice guest in our thing. We have a nice lady with us. Stop it. You look hot. What did you think when you if you brought them up to me what did you think when you first saw them pop up And these are workbooks I was shocked Workbooks that they sell to a company your book and you had nothing to do with them And you could do a workbook for example

Savannah Guthrie: Well yes I mean, and here's the thing. My mother's the one who told me about it. She said, oh, honey, I bought your workbook. I'm like, what workbook? And then she told me to look it up. And then I saw it. And you know, what is horrifying about it is, well, I mean, first of all, who knows what the heck it says with our names on it. But also people spend their real money. It's not like it's $1. It was $14.99. Actually, at one of my book events, this nice lady brought it to me. She said, I just wanted you to know there are these fake workbooks. And I said, oh, I'm all over it. I know. And I, of course, immediately said it to the publisher, but there's very little they can do. I don't understand it totally from a legal perspective. If there's a true likeness to your book, like there were a few that came on that were light yellow like mine, they could get those taken down. But the others, they don't. And it's just really unfortunate because people are spending their money on it. And also for authors and even publishers, you know, that's a book not sold if somebody's buying a workbook that's fake.

Kara Swisher: Right. No, 100%. I hope you know I complained to the CEO of Amazon to your behalf. So, you know, I just was like, it was like crazy, but they can't do anything. Scott, final question?

Scott Galloway: So when you and your boyfriend, now husband, were thinking about building a life together, and I don't know if you had the conversation around religion, but it's unlikely unless people meet at church or temple that their exact views on this topic calibrate perfectly. And did you have conversations around this? Did you find you needed to accommodate? Did one person grow into it more than the other? Was it less important to one person than the other? So did it shape more around who it was important to?

Scott Galloway: Talk about how you decided that religion should morph or not such that you could shape a life together.

Savannah Guthrie: We talked about it a lot. I came up in a tradition where you weren't supposed to marry outside the faith. I think his tradition probably was the same as well. So right there, we're already heretics in some sense. But we talked about it a ton. We actually faffed around and dated for five long years before getting married, and this was one of the topics that came up. How can we make this work and still have integrity with both of our faiths? That's something that we're trying to do and not water down either one.

When they're little, it's easier to do that. When they're older, I anticipate that will come up and we will deal with it as it does. But what I knew I couldn't do was in any way water down or walk away from my faith. My husband has known this about me since our very first date and would never ask me to. I have to give him a ton of credit. For me to not only be this person, but then to be in this strange position where I'm writing a book about faith, which is so out there. He never once was like, "That's great, sweetie, but do you need to?" He completely and totally supported me, which I am so grateful for.

The biggest thing I've learned is whether you have a lot of faith or a lot of doubt or something altogether different, people long for connection. They want to have conversations that are deep and meaningful. I've had more conversations, even with friends I've had forever, since writing this book. Even Kara and I, who are text besties, and we've talked about a lot of things. When I said I was writing this book, it opened up a conversation we hadn't had before. I loved that she was so open and interested. She said, "I love talking to people about faith. It doesn't mean I agree with your faith. It means, isn't it interesting to have these conversations?" Isn't this more valuable to spend time talking about what you believe, what you don't believe? Let's connect as humans. This is the stuff that actually matters. I'm hoping the book at least creates that opportunity.

Kara Swisher: That's exactly right. My favorite course I ever took was called Problem of God at Georgetown. It was taught by a Jesuit priest. It goes, we're here to discuss, is it God's problem with man or man's problem with God? It was all about existentialism. It was mind-blowing. It was a mind-blowing class for me in a lot of ways. Anyway, this book is really interesting. I've really enjoyed reading it. Scott does talk about community a lot. It's important. This is what it's about, faith and community, which doesn't necessarily have to have any religion at all. The book is *Mostly What God Does: Reflections on Seeking and Finding His Love Everywhere* by Savannah Guthrie and her AI friends. Thank you so much.

Savannah Guthrie: Thank you. I so enjoyed it.

Scott Galloway: Thanks, Scott. Thanks, Kara.

Kara Swisher: Nice to meet you, Savannah.

Scott Galloway: All right, Scott, bringing a little God in here. We should have a lot. We vary ourselves.

Kara Swisher: It's a great discussion. It really is to talk about that in an intelligent way, which usually it does not get intelligent, unfortunately. One more quick break. We'll be back for wins and fails.

[Ad Break]

Kara Swisher: Okay, Scott, would you like to go first? Or would you like to go first?

Scott Galloway: You go first, Kara. I've been doing all the speaking.

Kara Swisher: I think the biggest fail this week is a political one. The Republicans badly misplayed their hand. They look very stupid. They kept indulging themselves by saying "Weekend at Bernie's" for Biden. He's not. It's not true. It wasn't true in the first place. He's old. And they've given him a very good in here. I think what the Democrats should do is start to define Trump in ways that are actually true. My thing was, repeat: rapist, racist, fascist. Use those techniques. I think they did themselves a disservice. I don't really want them to win, but they did themselves a disservice.

For the win, I love that Barbie got really shafted in the Oscars. Everyone's focused on the "I'm Just Ken" performance, which was great, Ryan Gosling. But Billie Eilish is such a talent, an enormously deep, moving talent. She won an Oscar for a song she sang. She deserves every bit of it. She was carrying it around. The song is "What Was I Made For?" from *Barbie*. It's one of the most beautiful songs and so moving. Everything she does is fantastic. So that's my win and fail.

Scott Galloway: Nice. Yeah, Barbie should have won everything.

Kara Swisher: Okay, I can't resist. What award should Barbie have won instead of?

Scott Galloway: Margot Robbie could have. I know Emma Stone won it. There were a lot of good people. The woman from *Flower Moon*. She should have at least been nominated. I thought she was a fantastic actress, Margot Robbie.

Kara Swisher: I agree. She's great. And she was quite good in this. Did you see *I, Tonya*? I thought that was her best film.

Scott Galloway: Yes, she was fantastic. But because she was wearing pink, you didn't see how good the performance was. And it really was.

Kara Swisher: That's an interesting frame. I hadn't thought of it. Anyway. Okay. So my win, and we keep talking about this, the TikTok ban. I think they chose the wrong word. It should be called TikTok regulation. It looks like it's going to pass the House. We'll see if it passes the Senate. Biden has said he'll sign it. This is how it's going to play out. On the eve of the ban, the folks at ByteDance are going to say, "The jig is up. It's no longer a propaganda tool we hoped it would be." They don't want to lose a quarter of a trillion dollars. So they will come to some sort of accommodation. Money wins and money will win here. No one is going to lose their TikTok. That's my win. Also for the shareholders of TikTok, including ByteDance who sell it, the value once this cloud of uncertainty is removed, I believe the value of the company is going to go up 50 to 100%.

Kara Swisher: Can I counter that for a minute with intelligence by Mark Cuban? We had a long talk about this. He said it's actually not valuable without the algorithm. The Chinese will not let us have the algorithm because it will show that they may or may not have done what we think they may or may not have done, which is all kinds of manipulation. He said the best thing would have been to get your history on the service and reverse engineer the algorithm. I barely understand what he's saying, but it's very complicated. Then you find out whether the Chinese did cheat or put their finger on the scale. They can't let you know if they did. And if they didn't, well, they probably did. He said it's not as valuable. You get the user base, but you're not getting the algorithm and it could be a real problem for the company. I asked him if he was making a bid for it, because he's always been interested in these social media sites. He said no, because of that.

Scott Galloway: I think with a quarter of a trillion reasons to try and figure out an AI algorithm, this thing has so much momentum that I do think... He made that point. I don't think TikTok is going to go away. Reels isn't as good as TikTok, but with this kind of opportunity and the developments in AI, the new owners are going to do a decent job. It might not be as good.

Kara Swisher: I get it. I just was interested by this, and I had not heard it from others. He's so smart. I always listen to what he says. Go ahead.

Scott Galloway: My fail is anti-Semitism on campuses. The signs: "Zionist not allowed," "Zionist not welcome." Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism. These signs were at UC Santa Barbara. The University of California changed my life, and it was very upsetting for me to see this. I think anti-Zionism signage from people who aren't having a thoughtful conversation around history and actual data is thinly veiled anti-Semitism. Israel is held to a double standard that's not applied to any other nation. The right to existence of no other sovereign state is called into question. Anti-Zionism becomes anti-Semitism when the Jewish people as a whole are held accountable for the actions of the Israeli government, typically resulting in discrimination, harassment, or violence against individual Jews. We are seeing more and more of that. It is not going away on campuses. Protesting at Jewish temples, at Holocaust museums, saying "Zionists not allowed on campus." I see that as anti-Semitism.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said very eloquently in the UK, "You want to protest peacefully, you want to have signs saying you're pro-Palestine, pro-Gaza, you're anti-Israel, fine. But you start yelling hate speech and become violent, we're going to move against you and hold you accountable." I'm very disappointed that the University of California leadership hasn't taken more of a leadership stand and distinguished between free speech and hate speech. I thought this was moving from a boil to a simmer. It's not. It appears to have picked up again in the last couple of weeks. That's my fail.

Kara Swisher: We had an interruption during our Gavin Newsom event in California over protesters. They kept saying, "Call for a ceasefire." I get it. I just think some of the things that are continuing to happen and how Netanyahu... Biden is even saying, "I have a red line of what you're doing there." And Netanyahu is ignoring him completely. Biden handled it well. And by the way, the protests at your book signing, I think are entirely acceptable and appropriate.

Scott Galloway: I agree. Except they weren't listening to him. They didn't want dialogue in that case.

Kara Swisher: But I get it. It's fair game. He's fair game to have Gavin Newsom and all these roles. I just feel like it's getting worse. At this point, they've got to have a ceasefire. They really do.

Scott Galloway: Can I take the other side of that?

Kara Swisher: Please do.

Scott Galloway: A religious fundamentalist violent group takes control of the Mexican government. It's elected democratically. They believe that white evangelical Texans are treating immigrants poorly, have been inhumane to people trying to get across the border, and decide to couch it in religion and say they should be exterminated. They don't have a right to existence. They build tunnels and they incur into Texas. They kill everyone at the University of Texas, all the faculty, all the family members. On the way back to Mexico, they take the freshman class of SMU hostage and put them under tunnels in Mexico City. What would we do to them? It would be the great Sonora charred parking lot. There'd be no calls for a ceasefire.

Here's what happens. We should absolutely coordinate with the Israeli government to allow humanitarian aid. The fact that Netanyahu is doing anything to get in the way of that is diabolical and wrong. At the same time, if it was us, we wouldn't be calling to save the hospital in Playa del Carmen. We would not listen to calls for a ceasefire. In my view, until Hamas is eliminated, even Qatar is sick of Hamas senior level officials. If they do not release the hostages, I don't think there should be calls for ceasefire. There was a ceasefire on October 6th. There will be one once they put down their weapons and surrender. Israel should be given the same expectation, the same rights we as Americans demanded when someone attacked us at Pearl Harbor or on 9/11, and that is unconditional surrender. Any ceasefire other than for humanitarian aid just leads to them rearming, rebuilding, and eventually more death.

Kara Swisher: All right. I wonder why it's ginned up again. But I do feel like Netanyahu is exactly the wrong leader at this moment. He's not making it more secure. Most Israelis and most Jews agree with you.

Scott Galloway: I agree.

Kara Swisher: I know. I apologize. I don't mean to be hostile towards you. I think you're evoking a good viewpoint. I get what you're saying, but it's devastation all over the place. Biden said the way we reacted at 9/11, you get what we did. Probably we did too much. Anyway, we want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business, tech, or whatever's on your mind. Go to nymag.com slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 855-51-PIVOT. Okay, Scott, that's the show. We'll be back on Friday for more.

[Outro music]

Kara Swisher: Today's show is produced by Larry Naiman, Zoe Marcus, and Taylor Griffin. Ernie and her Todd engineered this episode. Thanks also to Drew Burrows and Neil Severio. Nishat Kurwa is Vox Media's executive producer of audio. Make sure you're subscribed to the show wherever you listen to podcasts. Thanks for listening to Pivot from New York Magazine and Vox Media. You can subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com slash pod. We'll be back later this week for another breakdown of all things tech and business. Love the poor. That's a decent place to start. We'll see you next time.