--:-- [Theme music fades out]
--:-- Noelle King: Welcome to Today Explained. We're here at 100 Days of Trump Part 2. They say they like to flood the zone, and boy did the zone feel flooded. Can you remember everything?
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Oh my gosh. Liberation Day. Backing off Liberation Day. Greenland. Canada. Canada. Ukraine. The Oval Office meeting with the yelling. Thank you. The penny. They were going to get rid of the penny. I think I still see pennies. Showerheads. Showerheads. Immigration. Daylight savings. I think we still have that, too. Deporting some people who are citizens. Fighting with the courts. Withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accords. Doge. Aid. Project Esther and anti-Semitism. Everything is computer. Going after Harvard. Rewriting history. You did a show on that. Donald Trump said there are two genders. The Pope's funeral. Yep, the eggs are still pricey. A weird number of SIG Hiles.
--:-- Noelle King: Today, I think we focus on one main theme. How about that? Yeah, which one?
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Revenge, Sean. Revenge.
--:-- Noelle King: Coming up on Today Explained. Support for this show comes from ServiceNow. AI is only as powerful as the platform it's built into, don't you know? That's why it's no surprise that more than 85% of the Fortune 500 use the ServiceNow AI platform. Didn't know that. While other platforms duct tape tools together, ServiceNow seamlessly unifies people, data, workflows, and AI, connecting every corner of your business. And with AI agents working together autonomously, anyone in any department can focus on the work that matters most. I've never met an AI agent. Learn how ServiceNow puts AI to work for people at servicenow.com.
--:-- Noelle King: Support for this show comes from strawberry.me. Be honest. Are you happy with your job? Or are you stuck in one you've outgrown? Or never wanted in the first place? Sure, you can probably list the reasons for staying, but are they actually just excuses for not leaving? Let a career coach from strawberry.me help you get unstuck. Discover the benefits of having a dedicated career coach in your corner. Go to strawberry.me slash unstuck to claim a special offer.
--:-- Noelle King: You're listening to Today Explained. Okay, Andrew, go ahead as always, give me your full name and tell me what you do.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: I'm Andrew Prokop, senior correspondent, Vox, covering politics.
--:-- Noelle King: All right, so we're talking today because President Trump has now been in office for a thousand days. How would you say the first thousand days have gone?
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Time flew. I didn't really realize that it was the year 2028. 100 days in, for clarity. What are sort of the big themes of the second Trump administration?
--:-- Andrew Prokop: I've been thinking about it as I've tried to, you know, rise above the day-to-day headlines and focus on the recurring stories, things where big things have happened already that have made a difference. And I think there are really four stories of that nature so far. The first is the economy and tariffs. It's a big deal. It's a big deal. This is the beginning of making America rich again.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: The second, I would say, is immigration, as Trump attempts to impose his mass deportation agenda, as he is making the U.S. a less welcoming place for foreigners generally. All sorts of big, high-profile battles and showdowns, and we're probably just at the beginning of that.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: I'd like to go a step further. I mean, I said it to Pam. I don't know what the laws are. We always have to obey the laws. But we also have homegrown criminals that push people into subways that hit elderly ladies on the back of the head with a baseball bat.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: The third, I would say, is Elon Musk and Doge and this general agenda of kind of dismantling government, cutting government spending. This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy. Firing federal workers.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: But the fourth, I think, and one in which in some ways is the most ominous, is what I view as Trump's agenda of retribution. I am your warrior. I am your justice. And for those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution. I am your retribution.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: He has been more willing than any other president in recent memory to use the power of the federal government against people who he views as his political enemies or people who are viewed as being on the left.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: There's a strong argument that no one should be surprised by this, because when President Trump was candidate Trump out on the campaign trail, he repeatedly said he was going to go after people, places, things, institutions.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Is what we are seeing, I know you were watching that carefully, is what we are seeing what Trump promised? Well, he said different things at different times.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: There were some moments. I remember one moment when he was on Fox News and the host was basically begging him to to say, I'm not going to seek retribution against my political enemies. My question is very serious one. You know, people are claiming you want retribution. People are claiming you want what has happened to you done to Democrats. Would you do that ever?
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Look, what's happened to me has never happened in this country before. And it has to stop because... Wait a minute. I want to hear that again. It has to stop. Well, it does have to stop because we're not going to have a country anymore. And if you're elected, what does that mean? Define that.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Look, what I've gone through, nobody's ever gone through. I'm a very legitimate person. I built a great business. And I think he has chosen pretty much a maximally aggressive course as compared to, you know, all of the possibilities that had been expected as to how far he could go on this.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: If we focus at first just on Washington and on the mix of politicians and lobbyists, et cetera, who inhabit this place, who's Trump gone after? Well, he's gone after a lot of people involved with the Biden administration, you know, Biden himself, several of his top officials.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: The security detail for Anthony Fauci was terminated last night, sir. Do you have a comment?
--:-- Andrew Prokop: No, I think, you know, when you work for government, at some point your security detail comes off.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: He's gone after people who are involved in sort of the legal resistance against Trump or were involved in the cases that were about investigating or indicting Trump But he also gone after some of his own people or people who used to be some of his people They all made a lot of money they can hire their own security to
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Then there's the case of Mike Pompeo, who was Trump's secretary of state in his first term. He seemed to be in line for another top appointment as recently as perhaps October 2024. But somehow people behind the scenes convinced Trump that Pompeo was somehow against him.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: And then suddenly during the transition and at the beginning of the administration, we see these personal public attacks on Pompeo and then yanking his security details.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: A top aide associated with Pompeo, Brian Hook, as well, someone who was on Trump's State Department transition team before suddenly being kind of penalized by Trump's retaliation.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: So he's really sort of used it, you know, against Democrats, against his critics, but also people on his own side who he feels like stepped out of line in some way or demonstrated insufficient loyalty.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Mike Pompeo and Brian Hook are very interesting because the security detail for them would appear to matter. These are both men that have had threats to their lives. They both worked on Iran.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Oh, this is extremely unusual. It's unprecedented as far as I know. It's extremely petty. You know, the justification that they give is, oh, this is expensive and we don't want to, like, fund it.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: But, I mean, that's just silly. It's a rounding error in expense. It's just like a personal form of payback that's like, hey, if you step one toe out of line, I'm not going to, you know, make sure that a hostile foreign power doesn't assassinate you.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: I'm going to, you know, leave you open to that possibility. I'm not doing anything for you. Let's move on to the colleges, universities, Columbia, Harvard, etc. We've covered on the show how Trump has gone after them.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: What is Trump's rationale for going after these colleges, which seem to fall mainly in the category of like elite? Elite universities were kind of in right wing thinking, were basically deemed of certain of Trump's top donors, the center of wokeness.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Like they were what unleashed wokeness on society. Right wing activists like Christopher Rufo want to really kind of smash the universities. But of course, the public universities under left-wing bureaucratic rule are hostile to open inquiry, hostile to civic debate.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: To really go after, as we've seen Harvard and this belief that the universities are the power centers of the left, and if you can take away their research funding, if you can threaten their tax-exempt status, if you can threaten all kinds of other consequences, you will force them to behave in ways that are more accommodating to the right.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: He seems to understand that for some percentage of the population, it's going to feel really good that he's going after Harvard. He talks less about his campaign of revenge on law firms. Again, these are elite law firms in Washington, D.C. and other urban centers.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: What is what is Trump doing to them? So this is more related to kind of the prosecutions and investigations of Donald Trump, which often involved certain people who either used to be or are at these law firms.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: And so I think he has some resentment about that. And then there's also, again, there's this right-wing agenda, activist agenda as well, where they argue that, oh, these big law firms are kind of in their own way centers of progressive activism as well in what's known as the pro bono work that they offer to do for various causes.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: So, you know, you have this Trump effort to kind of punish these big law firms. And as we saw in universities as well, of kind of deals or agreements in which they say, oh, OK, we will do these things differently. We will pledge this amount of pro bono work or money to these causes that Trump likes and so on.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: Yeah, you said earlier that a lot of this is unprecedented. And I wonder, presidents can do a lot legally. They have a lot of leeway, even things that look a lot like revenge. How much of this is in the purview of what a president is allowed to do, but maybe ordinarily doesn't for reasons of self-control?
--:-- Andrew Prokop: And how much is actually testing the power of what the executive branch is allowed to do? The president can do a lot of things that with his authority that he perhaps due to older notions of decorum or fairness or ethics that seem out of date in this administration that he would not have previously done.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: But they're also just doing a lot of stuff that seems completely illegal. And so why not both? They're pursuing both and they're going to see what sticks because they fundamentally view politics and the purpose of government as about punishing their enemies.
--:-- Andrew Prokop: And which in this case they've defined so broadly as to define like as to encompass all sorts of liberal or left leaning institutions as well as the specific people and groups that have that have run afoul of Donald Trump personally.
--:-- Sean Rameswaram: Vox's Andrew Prokop. Sean Ramos for him. You're up next. Who do you got?
--:-- Sean Rameswaram: We got actually someone who was a victim of President Trump's retribution season. I don't think he got mentioned in your conversation with Andrew, but former Ambassador John Bolton, who also lost his security clearance on day one. We're going to hear from him, Noel.
--:-- Noelle King: Support for Today Explained comes from Chime. Nobody likes fees and complicated banking, says Chime. And Chime gets that, says Chime. Chime is a financial technology company that says they understand that every dollar counts. So when you set up direct deposit through Chime, they say you get access to fee-free features, such as free overdraft coverage, getting paid up to two days early with direct deposit, so much more.
--:-- Noelle King: Chime says with qualifying direct deposits you can be eligible for free overdraft up to on debit card purchases and cash withdrawals Plus they say you don need to worry about monthly fees or maintenance fees
--:-- Noelle King: You can work on your financial goals through Chime today. You can open an account in two minutes at Chime.com slash explained. That's Chime.com slash explained. Chime feels like progress. Chime is a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services and debit card provided by the Bancor Bank N.A. or Stride Bank N.A. Members FDIC.
--:-- Noelle King: Spot me eligibility requirements and overdraft limits apply. Timing depends on submission of payment file. These apply at out-of-network ATMs, bank ranking, and number of ATMs according to U.S. News and World Report 2023. Chime, checking account required.
--:-- Noelle King: and make your dream a reality. Turn those what-ifs into... Sign up for your $1 per month trial at shopify.com slash special offer. Support for Today Explained comes from Upwork. If you run a business, you know that scaling your business requires the right expertise at the right time.
--:-- Noelle King: I sometimes wonder how many of you are running businesses out there. I would love to know. Please email me, noelle at king.com. With Upwork, you can find specialized freelancers in IT, web development, AI, design, admin support, marketing, and more experts who they say are ready to help you take your business to the next level.
--:-- Noelle King: With more than two decades of experience, Upwork has a simple and ambitious goal to pioneer a better way of working. Companies at every stage turn to Upwork to get things done and find more flexibility in the way they staff key projects and initiatives by accessing a global marketplace full of top talent.
--:-- Noelle King: Plus, Upwork makes posting your job easy with no cost to join. You can register, browse freelancer profiles, get help drafting a job post, or even book a consultation. You can visit Upwork.com right now and post your job for free. That is Upwork.com to post your job for free and connect with top talents ready to help your business grow. That's U-P-W-O-R-K.com, Upwork.com.
--:-- Noelle King: Today, explain is back. And here's the reason I wanted to hear from John Bolton today. Bolton served in the first Trump administration as a national security advisor. He served alongside former chief of staff John Kelly, who last October told The New York Times that that he thinks Donald Trump is a fascist.
--:-- John Bolton: Well, I'm looking at the definition of fascism. It's a far-right, authoritarian, ultra-nationalist political ideology and movement characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized hypocrisy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy.
--:-- John Bolton: So certainly in my experience, those are the kind of things that he thinks would work better in terms of running America. But when John Bolton was asked about John Kelly's assessment, he basically said Trump's too dumb to be a fascist.
--:-- John Bolton: I wanted to ask him if he still feels that way 100 days into Trump, too. I mean, I don't disagree with John Kelly on his assessment about Trump, what Trump does and what's wrong with it. But to be a fascist, you have to think in at least some conceptual level, which Trump never does.
--:-- John Bolton: Trump is a problem without without without that label. And he has caused a lot of damage. He did in his first term. He will in his second term. I just don't like to get lost in the bumper sticker argument rather than arguing about substance.
--:-- John Bolton: And I would say I don't think John Kelly disagrees with me on that. So you would quibble with the term fascist because it's just, what, simplistic or it's a slogan? It's too far above Trump's capabilities.
--:-- John Bolton: I mean, he just – he has no philosophy. He has in the national security space. He has no grand strategy. He doesn't do policy as we conventionally understand that term. This is difficult to accept.
--:-- John Bolton: I know it was difficult for me to accept that anybody could be so totally transactional, so totally focused on what's in it for him. But that's Trump. There are plenty of people around him with problematic philosophies, people who do have the ability to think at a more conceptual level.
--:-- John Bolton: But what they say may ultimately be reflected in certain Trump decisions, but it's not because he shares their worldview or anything like that. What was your impression of his approach, if not something leaning towards fascism or authoritarianism, when you were in his administration the first go-round?
--:-- John Bolton: Well, I think he wants to be the center of attention. I think that's probably his principal motivating factor. And I think his approach was once described by Charles Krauthammer very well. and Krauthammer said it to me, but I think he said it publicly on any number of occasions, that he began by thinking Trump was an 11-year-old, but he realized after a close evaluation that he was about 10 years off, Trump's really a one-year-old who just sees everything in the world and asks the question, what's in this for me?
--:-- John Bolton: Somebody else who I don't remember the name, observed that Trump doesn't have ideas, he has reactions. And I think that's also an important insight. So in my book, I said, if you took all of his decisions in his first term, they'd be like a big archipelago of dots. A lot of the dots I agreed with. But if you try to connect the dots, you know, you're welcome to it. Trump himself couldn't connect the dots.
--:-- John Bolton: What have you thought of the first hundred days of the second administration so far? Well, I think it's even more incoherent. But what you're seeing in public now that many people find surprising, I think, is what many of us who were in the first term saw in private, but that he never said in public.
--:-- John Bolton: A lot of these ideas have been kicking around. I think, obviously, they spent the four years in exile at Mar-a-Lago planning. Their first 100 days much more was accomplished from Trump's point of view than in his first 100 days in the first term.
--:-- John Bolton: I'm not sure, though, that history will record that after this burst of activity in the first 100 days, there's much more follow-up. that I think Trump will get bogged down in a lot of subsidiary issues that he happens to, that happened to catch his attention For example he now chairman of the board of the Kennedy Center And I can think of nothing more important than for a man who knows so much about buildings and the hospitality industry to spend a little time on the question of the rugs at the Kennedy Center, the carpeting, the curtains and the stages.
--:-- John Bolton: I mean, I think really some high level attention is required for that. And I think if really I get his ear, I could get him over at the Kennedy Center for a day, a week for the next several months.
--:-- John Bolton: I think you're getting at something that I'm constantly struck by, which is while this seems like a serious administration with serious ideas of Project 2025, what have you, there's also all of these distractions that make this seem like a bit of a clown car. The doge firings and then hiring back of nuclear safety personnel, the infamous Houthi PC small group chat, the tariffs, no tariffs, tariffs, just kidding, no tariffs.
--:-- John Bolton: I saw someone say, I wonder if the fall of the Roman Empire was this stupid. And that really hit for me. But at the same time, you've got the campaign of retribution we've spoken about. You've got defying court orders and challenging the judiciary. You've got the silencing of speech left and right, the First Amendment.
--:-- John Bolton: I mean, when you see these constitutional infringements, are you worried for the state of the republic? I don't think Trump is an existential threat. I think our institutions are a lot stronger than him. And not so much the fall of the Roman Empire, but the fall of the Roman Republic began with Sulla and then Pompey and then Catiline and then Julius Caesar.
--:-- John Bolton: And I'll tell you, Donald Trump is none of those four. Thank goodness. So I think we will survive. But I think many of the things you've mentioned, he has singled out by executive order, for example, Chris Krebs, the former head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Bureau at Department of Homeland Security, in his first term for prosecution because he dared to say that the 2020 election was safe and free from interference in cyberspace, which Trump didn't want to believe.
--:-- John Bolton: He singled out a fellow named Miles Taylor, who had been chief of staff to the secretary of homeland security. These are actions by a president with no predicate for a criminal investigation that I think are very threatening. But I think you've got to evaluate all this, and there are many more. You've named some. We could name others.
--:-- John Bolton: That's Trump making the first move, and he's done all this, as you say, in the first 100 days. He's done it in Trump time because he stays up until 2 in the morning. He's constantly active. The judicial system, obviously doesn't normally react with such speed. So Trump makes his headline and then moves on to something else.
--:-- John Bolton: And the real question is, what is followed up? And I think if we come back in a couple of years, we'll see a lot of the effort of the first 100 days just in ashes, because the courts will have held, I believe they will, I think they are fully independent.
--:-- John Bolton: I'm not worried about that. I think that is the ultimate check. It obviously will have cost people money for attorney's fees and time and aggravation and concern. But I think a lot of these efforts will fail and they will set precedents that will make it even harder for a future president to try this kind of thing.
--:-- John Bolton: I'm hoping, for example, that on tariffs, not directly what you're asking about, but I hope, you know, it was 95 years since the Smoot-Hawley tariffs, which were an act of monumental stupidity in 1930. I think history will record the Trump-Vance tariffs as another monumental act of stupidity And hopefully it'll be another 95 year long lesson.
--:-- John Bolton: So so from that perspective, a lot of what has happened in the first hundred days, we have to say is incomplete, because while Trump has moved his pawn to King four, the rest of the system is still reacting.
--:-- John Bolton: You, of course, I believe, have worked under four presidential administrations, from Reagan to George H.W. Bush to George W. Bush to, of course, President Trump. Does that, you know, historical long view that you personally possess, you know, work to your advantage in these trying times of ours?
--:-- John Bolton: Well, you know, we've suffered a lot worse in this country. We did have a civil war where over 600,000 soldiers died of one cause or another and the country moved on. So I'm not underestimating the problems that Trump is causing. I just think it's important to bring as many people along on the proposition that this is unacceptable.
--:-- John Bolton: And I think sometimes, you know, using the rhetoric that says this is existential turns people off. And I'm looking to convince as many people as possible that this is an aberration in American politics. that it's not sustainable, and particularly in the Republican Party, that beginning in 2026, certainly in 2028, we've got to move on from it.
--:-- John Bolton: Since you were looking ahead to the 2028 election, let me ask you quickly before we go about the 2024 election. I believe you said you wouldn't vote for either candidate and that you would write in a true conservative like Dick Cheney. Of course, Dick Cheney went on to endorse Kamala Harris. Did that change your mind when you were in the voting booth there?
--:-- John Bolton: Yeah, absolutely. I voted for Mike Pence. Justice for Mike Pence. Who did his job, according to the Constitution, on January the 6th, 2021.
--:-- John Bolton: Are you hoping he's going to run in 2028? I don't know what he wants to do. America owes Mike Pence a big debt of gratitude, a lot that happened during the Trump administration. Maybe I should say a lot that didn't happen during the first term of the Trump presidency, you can a tribute to him.
--:-- John Bolton: And I hope he's not looking for publicity, but I hope he's kept careful notes of everything he did for posterity to know. Well, no one's ever said that on this show before, sir. I appreciate you bringing that to light.
--:-- Noelle King: Thanks for your time, Ambassador Bolton. Thanks for having me. Appreciate it. John Bolton of the Bolton Pack, Noelle. Wonderful to hear from him.
--:-- Sean Rameswaram: Today's episode was produced by Devin Schwartz and Victoria Chamberlain. We were mixed by Andrea Christensdottir and Patrick Boyd. Amina El-Sadi is our editor. Laura Bullard and Gabrielle Burbay were on The Facts. I'm Noelle King. Sean Ramos-Vurham. Today's Fund.
