MAGA's Epstein Civil War, SpaceX's xAI investment, and Trump's Rosie Threat

Kara Swisher: Adobe Acrobat Studio, so brand new. Show me all the things PDFs can do. Do your work with ease and speed. PDF spaces is all you need. Do hours of research in an instant. With key insights from an AI assistant. Take a template with a click. Now your Prezo looks super slick. Close that deal, yeah you won. Do that, doing that, did that, done. Now you can do that, do that, with Acrobat. Now you can do that, do that with the all new Acrobat. It's time to do your best work with the all new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

[Ad break]

Kara Swisher: So, your AI agents, they make the team that uses them more productive, right? But if they aren't connected to other agents, or your data, or your existing workflows, how productive can they really make your teams? Any business can add AI agents. IBM connects your agents across your company to change how you do business. Let's create smarter business, IBM.

[Ad break]

Kara Swisher: What do walking 10,000 steps every day, eating five servings of fruits and veggies, and getting eight hours of sleep have in common? They're all healthy choices. But do all healthier choices really pay off? With prescription plans from CVS Caremark, they do. Their plan designs give your members more choice, which gives your members more ways to get on, stay on, and manage their meds. And that helps your business control your costs, because healthier members are better for business. Go to cmk.co slash access to learn more about helping your members stay adherent. That's cmk.co slash ACCESS.

[Ad break]

Kara Swisher: Our occasional disagreements are why people show up.

Scott Galloway: That and how sexy I am.

Kara Swisher: Hi, everyone. This is Pivot from New York Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast Network. I'm Kara Swisher.

Scott Galloway: And Donald Trump is definitely on that list, that abstain list. But are you? I think I'm one of the few people that's not.

Kara Swisher: I know. I was surprised. First off, we have to start. We have to change. Rosie O'Donnell should legally change her name to Rosie Epstein.

Scott Galloway: Yeah. I have never seen a lamer attempt to distract people from what is going on. And by the way, I just want to acknowledge, I thought this was going to be old news and blow over. You were right on this. Thank you.

Kara Swisher: I was thinking about it. I was saying this last night to a friend. And I went, last week I was in Ibiza on the most perfect night at Calvin Harris. You know, I like the pop 40 DJs concert. I had taken X for the first time in 30 years.

Scott Galloway: What? Oh my God.

Kara Swisher: I like me so much on X, Kara. I really found a lot of...

Scott Galloway: Did you think about hugging me? Did you think about me?

Kara Swisher: I'm trying to think. You did not, you were not front of mind of me when I was on Molly. And I'm like, the music sounds amazing. It was a perfect night. And people are coming up to me and telling me how much they love my work and how important my work is. And I'm like, with my pupils looking like frying pans. And that was one of the best nights I've had in such a long time. And I thought, would I rather have that again or just be sitting back in my hot girl summer watching Republicans eat themselves alive over this? I got to be honest, I am so here for this. I think it's amazing.

Scott Galloway: I agree. Thank you for acknowledging that. I actually, Amanda had the same... a lot of people thought it was distraction. And I'm like, no, no, this is at the heart of what he has. And Amanda did make this point. He has trained them into QAnon, right? They're going to regret the training into QAnon, which was useful when it was useful. But these people really, truly believe this. And I've spent a lot of time on these networks, so I know it. When there's like, "Oh, it's no big deal." I'm like, no, no, this is like, in a religion, what's the center of it? It's at the center of this thing. And the pedophile thing is particularly resonant with them. They absolutely believe Hillary Clinton had a basement. Some of them do. They absolutely believe that there's a cabal that killed Jeffrey Epstein, etc. So it's one of the structures of his presidency in a weird way. You couldn't believe it. I don't believe it, but it's true.

Scott Galloway: But it's just so intellectually or morally inconsistent. It's like, if Jeffrey Epstein had invited a bunch of migrant workers to his island, we would have nuked it. But as long as it was just pedophiles. And this notion that we're shocked that a man found liable of sexual abuse, which is rape, might be on a list of a powerful man inviting people down to an island with underage women, like that's supposed to be a big shocker.

Kara Swisher: Yeah. Well, actually, let's get to this today because it's really important. We have other things we're going to talk about, like tariffs and how Elon is blurring the lines between his businesses. Another thing I think I got right there. But just so you know, where Donald Trump is now, he's doing the wrong thing in dealing with them.

Scott Galloway: 100%. When he put that thing out, I was like, no, no, no, no, sir. You have to be with them. Even if you're not with them, you have to be with them.

Kara Swisher: He says he doesn't like what's happening to his MAGA boys and gals. He's urging them not to waste time on Jeffrey Epstein, keeps saying he's dead. He has been throwing his support behind Pam Bondi in a true social post. And also he was at some soccer thing where everybody booed him and he clapped at her. He put his hand up, like his thumb up. But this civil war, let me just give people the idea, is really quite something. And many are demanding that Bondi, who they're calling Blondie, which is funny, be fired over this memo that found no evidence of a client list or Epstein being murdered. She's been very explicit about this. The Epstein investigation led to the White House confrontation between Bondi and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who's been pretty vocal about Epstein cover-up claims. He made his career. He made his podcast career. That was one of the structures of his podcast career. He didn't show up at work last Friday. There were rumors. Of course, he was leaking all over the place, clearly, that he's insisting. But the administration says he's still on the job. I suspect he'll fall into line because that's the kind of guy he is. But who knows? One of the things that's interesting is the various factionalism. And I'll go through this very quickly. Fox News is calling this a ticking time bomb. And Megyn Kelly, never not to weigh in on something grotesque, said over the weekend this could actually cost Trump the midterms. She's against Bondi, I guess. Bannon's against Bondi. I guess Elon's against Bondi. Charlie Kirk's against Bondi. Laura Loomer. Anyway, it's really quite something. It's like a weird little civil war. Now, I think they're going to fall into line now because I think he's going to put the kibosh on it behind the scenes. But I don't know. What do you think? What do you imagine?

Scott Galloway: Well, just around perception, first off, it doesn't even seem that they're that upset about pedophilia. They're that upset about not pursuing a conspiracy theory. And the thing that strikes me is that if someone had counseled him on how to appear to be more guilty, it would have been difficult. Right. He immediately gets defensive and says, "I can't believe you're not focusing on the tragedy of Texas" or "I'm thinking of canceling Rosie O'Donnell." He could not be acting more guilty. And whoever is coaching him is like, no, don't bring it up. He could have said this is an important case and the FBI, it's up to the FBI how they want to handle this.

Kara Swisher: Right. Except that he's made his career on it. That is the thing. He was very much, which is almost suicidal because he's been photographed with him like 67 times. There's videos of him dancing with his, white man dancing together. He's clearly been down there. He's on the logs. Let me, the only thing I would say is I know a lot of people who went down there, by the way. And I've told you I was invited to his house once and I declined because he's a sexual predator, which I told the PR person. I'm like, no, I'm not going to a sexual predator's house. But one of the things that is interesting is a lot of people who went down there, I don't believe necessarily went for sex. I think it was interesting. He was an interesting guy. It was kind of sexy. He was giving a ton of money away. Even Bill Gates. I think he was bored. I don't know what happened with Bill Gates. But I'm just saying, there was a lot of... And what was really interesting to me, and Melinda Gates talked about this. I was not happy with his affiliation. And someone, I think it was Sergey Brin, he and his wife were invited down. They went down, and the minute they got off the plane, his wife Ann knew what was up and was like, we're getting the fuck out of here. And so I think a lot of people went for these things for curiosity, sort of the same way they went to the Diddy parties, I guess. And some of the people went for full-on abuse of minors. It's weird, but the fact that they didn't know... the people who went that weren't necessarily doing that is grotesque too in a lot of ways. So it's always the cover-up, not the scandal. And he's handling this exactly incorrectly because all of a sudden he's created a massive cover-up of his own manufacturing. And watching them eat their own tail of conspiracy theory when it comes home for you.

Scott Galloway: But let's just... You have a situation. Okay, I'm in St. Bart's, and a Microsoft billionaire invites me on their yacht. And I go on the yacht, a lot of hot people, great party. I go, I have a good time, I leave. What if it ends up there were underage women on that boat? Did I do my due diligence? I went on this boat, I won't even say who it is, but it wasn't the founder of Microsoft. It was one of the founders. But I didn't do diligence around the personal behavior of this guy or whether he'd been convicted of anything or whether there were underage women on the boat. I just went because it sounded like a really good time. Now, I think there were a lot of people, quite frankly, just caught up in the strafe here. There are a lot of people who deserve scrutiny and to have their reputation ruined or to have legal ramifications. But I think there were probably a shit ton of people who are like, oh, it's a rich guy who throws great parties. And yeah, he wants to give me a ride to Boston on his plane. He gave a lot of people rides on his plane. I can absolutely see how people get caught.

Kara Swisher: The only thing is, it was before he was convicted, there was a lot of rumors about it. I knew them because he was at a lot of tech events. And after you, I think you have less of an excuse. After Florida convicted him. Many people knew about that.

Scott Galloway: But do you think every powerful person has an obligation to conduct a background check on everyone they spend time with?

Kara Swisher: No, it's just a world that I think people aren't familiar with. And I think you and I are a little bit, I'm sort of more peripherally, you go to more of those abuses and things like that. But there is a world where they all sort of swan around just like Jeff Bezos's wedding. There's a world like that. And one of the things about Epstein, like I was at a dinner he was at with 200 people and I got attacked by the anti-Epstein forces. Like, you were part of that. I'm like, literally, I never even met him. I was near him. I guess there was a photo where I was vaguely adjacent to him, but I didn't talk to him or anything else. So it was really, some of that happened a lot. He was at like 10 things, as I recall. I think that's where I was, where he was. But what was interesting is people that actually then took the next step after his conviction. I'm always like, very bad judgment on your part to do so. But if he had said, in my younger days, I love to have a good time. I love to be at great parties. This guy seemed like, let's be honest, he was a guy who loved to have a good time. He was giving money away. He invited me to his island. I went. I had a great time. I didn't engage in pedophilia. I didn't have sex with underage minors. But I went. It was a terrible error in judgment. And I apologize. If he just said that. But the fact that he's trying so hard to create weapons of mass distraction gives people an understandable suspicion that he did more than just go to the island. And it's always the cover up. It's not the scandal itself.

Scott Galloway: Talk a little bit about the... I think his misjudging of the depth of this mania on the right over this issue.

Kara Swisher: I didn't see it. Did you see this?

Scott Galloway: I did not see. I told you. I said this is not a distraction. This is going to blow up because I've spent... I've listened to these people and I've seen all the online stuff and they really are like rabbit around this. Look at what happened to Roseanne Barr. Look at what happened to... There's a lot of people who became insane over this topic, like a ton. And even the average person who isn't right. I've noticed a lot of people putting up like, well, I wasn't into the Epstein conspiracies, but now I am. You know what I mean? Like regular people are now like, what was he doing there? And so he's dragging in reasonable people, I guess, who would mostly just say, ugh, this is just ridiculous. I'm not a conspiracy theorist.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I don't. I find the whole thing a lesson in karma when you foment a conspiracy theory, and then they came for me. This is the ultimate example of that, right? What do you think is going to happen next?

Scott Galloway: Every time I think that Republicans are going to stand up for not having Medicaid stripped away from the people who elected them, or that someone who's convicted by a jury of his peers, including Republicans on that, of all 34 counts or whatever it is, I think this is the final straw, or I get hopeful that Lisa Murkowski or Susan Collins actually pretend to care.

Kara Swisher: I think you're right. I think they're all going to eventually fall in line. I think they're all going to wring their hands. The only thing is Pam Bondi, I'm curious, she might be the blood offering here.

Scott Galloway: No, no, I think Dan Bongino is.

Kara Swisher: I think he can't give in to this. He can't. Like, he might. That's the thing, because he's so desperate for attention and love from these people. That's the only thing he could do is give Bondi up in that regard. By the way, she's terrible, but it's like a list. We want to stack rank the idiots. I think what it shows is how quickly this is all going to devolve when Donald Trump is out of the picture. I think this is their... we are seeing their ass right now.

Scott Galloway: When you say devolve, what do you mean?

Kara Swisher: Meaning they don't... none of them, they're so different. Like there was always a problem of the left and the center in Dem politics. There is that, right? There's the centrist people who think the left is too left. There's a left who thinks the centrists don't understand that someone like Mundomini is the future. That is normal, right? That is a normal political party, like the Tea Party and the more institutionalists in the former Republican Party. But this group, they are so on opposite sides of everything. And not just opposite sides. People who are on the same side on one thing are on opposite sides on the other stuff. And so the fracturing of this Republican Party that Trump has built, once he is gone in some fashion, is going to be spectacular. Because you think J.D. Vance is going to hold this together? You think Don Jr.? No, none of these people have the power of Trump to hold this stuff together. And even he is showing signs of not being able to, whether it's age or misjudgment or something like that. But I just think it's going to be spectacular. You're seeing the signs of what's going to happen next. I mean, I think you are.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, speaking of a mess, Tariffpalooza is continuing. He's saying the U.S. will impose very severe tariffs on Russia if there's no peace deal with Ukraine in the next 50 days. I'm sure Putin is quaking in his boots. He's also threatened to hit EU and New Mexico, two of America's largest trading partners, with 30 percent tariffs starting August 1st. And Canada also back in the crosshairs. In a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump said Canadian goods would face 35 percent tariffs starting next month. Trump cited concerns about fentanyl coming across the border again as a justification. The ones from Brazil were because he didn't like a case against Bolsonaro. Talk a little bit about the Russian plan. I mean, this just keeps going. And the markets have not gotten yippy as before. Some people, including Jamie Dimon and others, think it's a problem that the markets aren't paying attention to this. So, thoughts?

Scott Galloway: I think literally, like I said, the market just continues to yawn. None of these things have come through. He always backs down. The market seems to be rerouting around it. The companies that are driving the NASDAQ and the S&P are essentially global companies now that don't appear to be subject to those tariffs, right? AI and Meta and Microsoft, to a certain extent, so far.

Kara Swisher: Well, except for copper. The 50% tariff on copper, which includes defense, electricity, and tech. U.S. imports over 40% of its copper. And switching to domestic supplies could take up to a decade. Industry groups are warning. They could slow AI data center growth. They have an event tomorrow in Pennsylvania, a $70 billion investment. And then Peter Thiel calls J.D. Vance and says, you're about to shut down AI. And the moment there's a whiff that this is going to threaten AI and the seven stocks that were responsible for 38% of the S&P checked down 20% and there's panic buying.

Scott Galloway: He listens to the markets and he listens to a small group of people, including Jamie Dimon, I think. And I think he's just going to back down. I think he's playing poker with a weak hand and keeps hoping the other folks around the table are going to fold. And I mean, just in terms of what's nonsensical, Canada, arguably our closest ally, largest undefended border in the world. Housing is a real issue in America. Young people are really angry because the percentage of first-time homebuyers is at an all-time low. The entrants are paying for the price of the incumbents weaponizing zoning such that they can increase or decrease the supply of new houses. And you want to talk about taking inflation up. What are the two primary inputs for a new house or two of them? Canadian lumber and Mexican drywall gypsum. You want to make things worse. You want to start talking about panic buying before the tariffs that creates inflation. The first uptick in an inflation number here, I just think they have to fold. And what happens if inflation really starts to spike and Chairman Powell, who has his own ego, says, you know what, we're contemplating raising interest rates. Well, Trump has the crosshairs on him, too, but he can only crosshairs so many people.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, but he doesn't care. He's in there for at least the shirt.

Scott Galloway: I just think the markets, the adult in the room in the cabinet is not a DUI hire to head the defense secretary. It's not an acolyte to basically pervert our justice system, our attorney general. The adult in the room here is the bond market, the 10-year and to a lesser extent, the equity markets. And they will absolutely respond. If these tariffs actually become a reality, you're going to see the markets... I mean, my co-host at Prop G Markets said what's interesting is that when these things clearly weren't going to happen, the markets kind of freaked out. And now the markets have gotten used to him and aren't freaking out. And he wonders that, okay, maybe Trump is so angry he's not being taken seriously that he'll actually go through with a couple of these things. But what is so insane and so stupid about these threats is the following. Trade agreements take 18 months minimum just to hammer out.

Kara Swisher: Not 90 in 90 days? What?

Scott Galloway: And then they take four years to implement because just the logistics of trying to track this stuff and figuring out the regulatory bodies that will do it and the payments. And the notion that he just sets this goal. And this is why business people shouldn't be president. He just doesn't understand how government works.

Kara Swisher: He's also playing. He played at being a businessman. I'm sorry. Just like he was a laughable businessman. I agree.

Scott Galloway: And the thing he doesn't... the overarching construct or philosophy that he doesn't understand about global trade and geopolitics is that the most visionary move in geopolitical history was when after defeating an army that had put people in concentration camps, had murdered our soldiers, violated Geneva Conventions, that was the Japanese, had brutalized tens of millions of people across Europe. We defeated them, and what did we decide to do? We decided to borrow a shit ton of money and rebuild their nations, recognizing that if we could create prosperity overseas, it would be of massive benefit domestically. That was the most visionary thing I believe ever done geopolitically. And what that set off was a recognition that global trade and prosperity are not a zero-sum game. It's not a win-lose game. That when Vietnam does really well, they not only export those Nikes, they start importing them and buying them.

Kara Swisher: You know, it was interesting. There was a story, one, everyone's writing the story, which we've talked about for months now, which is that suddenly all these other partners are getting together across Europe with China, Europe with, we talked about this early, but they are suddenly writing about it. The second thing is a lot of the people here who are here legally are sending all their money back to their countries now and not spending it here, which is interesting. Before the outflow of capital from immigrants here who are here legally is huge, is like gained because they don't feel that this is the place to put down roots or long term. And I have to tell you, I've heard from so many people about nervousness of leaving, a lot of students leaving this country and maybe not wanting to stay, like before they would have, at U.S. would have been the place they would have stayed and brought their incredible talents. Now they're like, I think I'm going back. I think I'm going back kind of thing, which I never heard from these people before, these kind of people.

Scott Galloway: The analogy I use is that what if one NBA team got the number one through number one million draft picks. Every other team, their first pick for their team was the millionth and first draft pick. We get the top million. We get the top people around the world. We get the most elite of the elite. What do the smartest people in Scotland all have in common? They left. And the majority that left came to America. And World War II, the most elite scientists, including the guy who figured out relativity, decided to come to America because they didn't like the environment in Europe that was emerging. And now we have thousands of scientists applying for intellectual asylum in France. I mean, literally, I want to go RFK, scientists can get on the plane.

Kara Swisher: They get on the plane. That's right.

Scott Galloway: And who did... what did these European scientists who saw an emerging fascism and inhospitable environment, what did they bring to the U.S.?

Scott Galloway: They brought our ability to land on the moon. They brought, not Nazis, but people who fled the Nazi regime, they brought chemotherapy, they brought quantum computing. Oh, and by the way, they brought the bomb, folks. And had the bomb, had the scientists who understood how to split the atom stayed in Vienna or in Austria, the war could have ended much differently. And instead, what we've decided is, let's take the most elite human capital in the world and let's encourage them to go back, go abroad. Anyway, it's ridiculous. Again, the biggest own goals of the last 20 years have been the unnecessary invasion of Iraq and Brexit. This could be bigger economically than all of those things.

Kara Swisher: I would agree. But the problem, the only problem is he is still in our innards ripping everything out.

Kara Swisher: All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break. When we come back, Google makes a major AI deal and SpaceX invests in xAI.

[Ad Break]

Kara Swisher: Scott, we're back. The AI talent war is escalating still. Google just hired the CEO and co-founder of Windsurf, an AI coding startup, along with several of the company's employees. Under the $2.4 billion deal, Google also gets some non-exclusive licenses to some of Windsurf's technology. The startup will still operate independently, but without those key employees. The move comes after a $3 billion deal between Windsurf and OpenAI fell apart. Windsurf's founders were reportedly wary of sharing Intel with Microsoft. It's the latest setback for OpenAI, which has been losing talent to rivals like Meta in recent weeks. First of all, this seems to be getting a little insane. The second thing is it feels like everyone's running, trying to get to the borders. Pick someone, get all the people they can, and pick up the land grab in terms of people. And they're also doing non-deal deals where they're trying to be cute with the government. "We're not buying this company. We're just buying everything that matters and gutting them."

Kara Swisher: Related, SpaceX reportedly invests $2 billion in xAI, and that's not all. Elon Musk says that Tesla shareholders will revote on whether to invest in xAI. Let's listen to what I said about this back in April. It looks like he's not interested in making cars anymore, or he's making other things. He wants to shift Tesla. And I think you're going to merge xAI, X, and this together in a big unholding company once. Yeah. So now SpaceX, too. This is, he's making a turducken in here. He said in a post on X that he does not support a merger of Tesla and xAI. But who knows what he's saying. By the way, he also said that Grok will be available in Tesla vehicles after the launch of Grok. Four users have discovered the model seems to refer to Musk's opinion also through news articles and X posts when answering questions. So it's mostly Musk stuff that they're borrowing from the LLM. Anyway, talk a little bit about this.

Scott Galloway: Well, the more interesting one, I think, is these acqui-hires. It's become so difficult to find alpha or the outsized returns because so many VC firms have raised a ton of money. There's just more capital now chasing fewer good deals. Some of them have gone really downstream and are actually incubating and starting companies themselves and then spinning them out. That was kind of what essentially Sam Altman's Y Combinator was doing. If I were a young venture capital partner, I'd try and find 12 really bright AI researchers and a couple managers at various companies and say, "Get together. I'm your first 50 million in. Find, determine a very small slice of the AI world to focus on." If we can build 12, 20, 50, 100 really talented AI people, the focus on your research is important, but it's not profound. Essentially, if you're an HR manager or recruiter and you can pull together a couple dozen really well-respected AI executives who can show an ability to work together and build stuff, the marketplace is so frothy and there's so much cheap stock that within 12 to 36 months, someone might show up and pay a billion dollars for those 24 professionals.

Kara Swisher: Or 2.4 to rent you.

Scott Galloway: To rent you. Yeah, or figure out a way not to raise the antennae of the DOJ or FTC and do some sort of crazy license that gives you money. But it's got to be a great time to be an AI researcher with any credibility anywhere. If you are a really talented young partner at a VC, you identify 300 talented AI engineers, researchers, executives, product managers. You call them and say, "Come start a company. You got 50 million. Within 24 months, we're going to be acqui-hired at one to three billion." Because these companies, no one talks about the technology or the company or the brand or the customers they have. They're just the war on talent here and the cheap capital chasing this talent has created alpha, if you will.

Kara Swisher: So do you think it's going to get past the government?

Scott Galloway: Not for too long. I don't know. Under this administration, yeah. Although Inflection certainly did. Remember, Microsoft got that one. But the FTC and the DOJ are mostly now about bothering media companies, who and what is giving money to or bothering Trump, or woke media companies. That seems to be their focus. I think these guys have been so savvy at weaponizing government and giving money to the right people that I would imagine an acqui-hire... I was part of an acqui-kill.

Kara Swisher: Really? They bought you and killed you?

Scott Galloway: Yeah. I always feel like I have a pretty good instinct for business. When my company, L2, was acquired, I couldn't figure out what they were doing. I gave them a list of the most valuable people at the company. Pretty much all of them left. Every decision they made, it was like that episode of Seinfeld where George Costanza decides to do everything entirely the opposite. Everything they did was entirely the opposite. I'm not exaggerating. I did a call weekly with my quote-unquote boss, which was hilarious, a group of people dramatically less talented than me that just showed up and talked big thoughts.

Kara Swisher: Wouldn't you like to get that time back?

Scott Galloway: And they literally told me, "Don't do anything. We don't want you doing anything." And I left. I hated it so much, I left several million dollars on the table. My partner used to say to me, I'd say, "I can't handle this. I got to get out of it." And she'd say, "How much money do you get if you just go in for five more mornings?" And I would do the math and she'd go, "So you don't want to just go in for five more mornings?" Oh, right. Yeah. She would do that to me every week. Anyways, finally, I said, "I'm out of here." There's a point where you can't anymore.

Kara Swisher: I have had that job. I've like, no, I can't.

Scott Galloway: I would say things like, "I think there's an interesting opportunity to go after Latin American CPG companies and I want to hire two people and start doing research there." And they're like, "Well, hold off on that." I have to come to the conclusion that we were threatening them and they thought, "We'll take a competitor off the market. We'll milk them for their cash flow. We won't make any new investments in the company. And this guy doesn't have a good idea in his head." And then a potential competitor is gone. This company, as I look back on it, has acquired a bunch of companies in verticals that were threatening their mothership. That's no way to create a company, by the way.

Kara Swisher: Oh, this company's done.

Scott Galloway: To their credit, this company's done really well from a shareholder's standpoint.

Kara Swisher: Oh, really? Okay. All right. Well, I still think it's non-creative and awful, not using Scott Galloway's God-given talent.

Scott Galloway: That's right. That's right. That's right. Sell more shit on the internet. Facebook's evil. Sell more shit.

Kara Swisher: What do you think of my correct prediction, once again, about this doing more of the integrating with this company, with all this stuff? Even if he says they're not merging, they're kind of the same thing, right? It doesn't really matter if they merge or not because they're interwoven in such a way that they're impossible to pull apart.

Scott Galloway: Well, first off, everyone says Twitter is now worth $33 billion. Not really. He got his other company to invest at a mark on that company to give it a $33 billion cap. He's essentially figuring out, "Okay, I've got some really amazing assets and I've got some shitty assets and I'm going to conglomerate to prop up my shitty assets, which are overvalued," specifically Tesla and a little bit Twitter. And he is a visionary. He wants to bring all these things together with AI at the heart, with Twitter providing all of the data set, with SpaceX and satellites giving better guidance and autonomous driving capability and his Tesla cars gathering more information and turn it into just kind of one big AI-driven company with distribution around cars, rockets, satellites, media. I mean, you can see this becoming kind of like Skynet, right? And he is a visionary.

Scott Galloway: Having said this, and this is unrelated, but I think important. If I were the FTC or the DOJ, in my view, the most dangerous monopoly in the world right now is SpaceX. 60% of low Earth orbit satellites are owned by one company. That is not acceptable. This is one private company, who is run by someone who is reportedly a drug addict, and can turn off and on battlefield technology that might shape the future of Europe and democracy. Okay, it's bad that Meta has too much control over the ad market. SpaceX is the most dangerous monopoly in the world right now. Do you realize 87% of space launches weren't from America. They weren't from NASA. They were from one company, SpaceX. That is an enormous security risk.

Kara Swisher: Well, speaking of that, of course, he's getting protected by people. Texas Governor Greg Abbott doesn't want to reveal his and his staff's communication with Elon Musk and his representatives from these companies. ProPublica's Texas newsroom requested the emails. Abbott's public information coordinator argued they should not be released in part because they include, quote, "intimate and embarrassing information." I want to, I mean, how much more embarrassing can this guy be in public? I don't know. He's sort of speaking of showing your ass all the time. This is what he does. Interestingly, he constantly is making a mess. So it'll be interesting to see who steps forward. It's certainly not going to be Greg Abbott, who's such a chode, but who could make that happen? Like make that, obviously other companies.

Scott Galloway: When you say "make that happen," you mean a breakup of SpaceX?

Kara Swisher: Not the breakup of SpaceX, but that the government has more leverage on them. I mean, obviously, more competitors would be one way, but certainly not. People like Greg Abbott will protect him.

Scott Galloway: Well, no, the DOJ and FTC and an attorney general, they'll do their jobs. They'll focus on the long term.

Kara Swisher: She's busy with Epstein.

Scott Galloway: The long-term well-being, material and economic well-being of American citizens. But what I took from the Epstein thing and what you just said about Governor Greg Abbott's reticence to let go, I believe that pretty much almost every piece of information, unless it's just scurrilous, intimate information on someone's private life that's for nothing but clicks... Why were they talking about that? What this all comes down to is I believe that this fidelity, this passion, this irreverence for anonymity has become dangerous. What do stormtroopers, the KKK, and ICE have in common? Or people on campus not allowing Jews into certain parts of UCLA public spaces? They're all wearing masks. What I see online is this ridiculous fidelity to anonymity has resulted in troll farms that are tearing society apart, or letting people behave in a way they would never behave in person. But now they're doing it in person. I mean, those ICE people should not... I'm sorry if their jobs are hard. They picked it. This is the life they've chosen.

Scott Galloway: What has been the most accretive, positive thing among law enforcement in America? I would argue that it is the following: body cams. If you're a cop and you run up against somebody who's mentally ill and treating you like shit, I can't imagine how tempting it is to just punch them in the face and put cuffs on them. I can empathize with that. But because they have a body cam on them and their badge number and their identification on their vest, they behave in a manner that is incredibly honorable and shows fidelity to the law. And some of them still don't, even despite the body cams. I think our men and women in blue are, given the situations they are thrust into every day, remarkable and show a lot more patience than your average citizen.

Scott Galloway: That was a reversal in anonymity. They not only don't have masks, it's like if you're a cop and you're going to use the full weight of the federal government and laws where you can deploy lethal power and incarceration against citizens, then we need to know exactly who the fuck you are and record it in 4D color. And when you let people put on masks, you're going the opposite way. There's going to be a decline in civility and fidelity to the law because you just get this rah-rah speech that the president said it's okay. "Go in there. And if there's a 13-year-old screaming, 'No, my mother is a citizen,' or you might put your knee on the head of a woman working at Home Depot," because people can actually see your face. That's a good thing.

Scott Galloway: I have argued for this. I believe social media and these platforms should force identification. You could still have accounts that are anonymous. If there's a person who needs an account to talk about women's rights in the Gulf, you could figure out pretty easily: is this person using an anonymous account because they're in real danger? Or are they doing it just to tear at the fabric of society or let people engage in depraved behavior? But anonymity, in my opinion, is one of the most damaging things in our society, conflating the First Amendment with anonymity. It goes back to the Epstein list. Let it out. Let it out. Scott and Carol, release the Epstein list. We are with Roseanne Barr on this one.

Scott Galloway: At the same time, Democrats have to put away this bullshit purity test on everything. People are human. And if someone ended up on a plane going to an island, a party, and there's no evidence that they engaged in anything, then it's like, okay, forgive them. Yeah, they had poor judgment. But release, for God's sakes, release the list. And Governor Abbott, everything that happens at a level of governor or Senate... What do you think is embarrassing? What do you think's in there? What's intimate and embarrassing?

Kara Swisher: They're probably saying, "Give me money and I'll make sure..."

Scott Galloway: Yeah, that's more than embarrassing.

Kara Swisher: Right. "Intimate and embarrassing." It was a weird choice of words.

Scott Galloway: The Nixon tapes eventually got released. Yeah, everything should get released. I agree.

Kara Swisher: You said something that was really powerful. People should be able to have secrets. And that is if it's just people's private lives. Okay, I don't think people have a right to publish everything. I do believe in privacy. I do believe that people should be able to have secrets. But when it comes to national security, government regulation, conversations among our elected representatives, I believe that for defense reasons, you can say it needs to be sealed for a certain amount of time. But eventually, be clear, folks, it's all going to come out. And what's going to happen to their behavior? It's going to improve.

Scott Galloway: Well, you know, it's interesting. I'm seeing online a lot of people when these ICE people go in now, sort of normal people, they were bothering a janitor. And all these doctors and nurses were like, "Get the fuck out of here" or "Show your face." And they're like, "You're assaulting an officer." And she's like, "I am not. I am not doing that. Take off your mask." You're seeing a lot of people personally offended by it. And it's not the American way to hide your face. I think that's been really inspiring.

Kara Swisher: You know what?

Kara Swisher: In the Superman movie, the bad guys are hiding their fucking faces all the time. And not Superman because he's a very handsome man. All right, Scott, let's go on a quick break. And when we come back, Elon Musk and Don Lemon go to court.

[BREAK]

Kara Swisher: Scott, we're back with more news. This is just a quick thing. Don Lemon's lawsuit against Elon Musk and X over the cancellation of their partnership will go to trial. Musk's team had tried to convince a judge to strike the complaint. San Francisco judge ruled that Lemon credibly alleged Musk had committed fraud by false promise. He'll probably win. Elon still won't pay him. As a reminder, Lemon filed the suit after X canceled his partnership a few hours after he taped a contentious interview with Musk. I don't know if Don will win this one, but it's good that he gets to go forward. We'll see some interesting emails with Linda Iaccarino and stuff. I hope he gets his money. I hope they all, at X, there's a whole bunch of people from Twitter who haven't gotten their money. They all should get their fucking money, Elon, give them their money. You know, even if you don't like them, give them their money. So we'll see. He probably won't. I love Don Lemon. I like the fact that he got fired from CNN and got fired from Twitter. And I think he's one of these people that's doing really good work. If you follow him on his Lemon Drops podcast, what I appreciate about Don, I also appreciate about Megyn Kelly, even though I don't agree with her politics. It's clear they work really fucking hard. And I really appreciate people who've achieved a certain level of celebrity status and probably economic security and just show up and work really hard. And I think he's fearless. I'm a huge fan of these new niche media companies. I like them. I'm rooting for them. And so I hope this is what happened. He's going to take them to court. My guess is Musk's attorneys are going to go, we'll fight and intimidate and try to embarrass him. But legally, we don't have a leg to stand on. And when they realize he's not backing down, they'll settle with him. And I hope he gets a big check because it was embarrassing for him to accept a job, ask real questions, and then be fired unceremoniously. And he's entitled to whatever severance he's legally entitled to.

Scott Galloway: Yes, yes. He should have never signed it, but that's another issue. I agree with you about the niche media companies, but there's a very big difference in what Don Lemon's doing and what Megyn Kelly is doing. I get that she works hard, but she works hard insulting women, screaming about things. I just, if that's the way you want to make your business, it's fine, but it's grotesque. I'm sorry. And a lot of these companies, some of them are amazing and some of them are just a bunch of hacks and they both will benefit.

Kara Swisher: Well, okay, I'll use others, whether it's Puck or The Information or what they're trying to do with The Daily Beast or Axios. Even if you don't agree with them with the way they acquit themselves, I'm here for these little niche media companies running The Daily Wire. I hate their shit, but I totally respect what they've built.

Scott Galloway: See, I have a much bigger reveal. It's got to be well done. I like the Bulwark. I don't agree with a lot of stuff they do, but they actually do journalism. The ones that don't are heinous. I'm sorry. They're just hacks, and I don't like hacks doing well, even if they're exciting and innovative in some way.

Kara Swisher: Well, okay, now do traditional media. I would agree. Same thing.

Scott Galloway: Same thing. I have the same filter for those. I agree.

Kara Swisher: I agree. Anyway, I had this interesting argument with Alex because he was insulting CNN or something like that, and I said, you know, the reporters of CNN are great, and you don't have to like the night stuff, and you need to distinguish between them. And he said, I can't. And we had a great discussion about it. And I would agree with him. If it tends too much towards the screamy and not the amazing reporters, I have a problem with it, too. All the stations.

Scott Galloway: The problem is it's the screamy stuff that makes all the money, Kara.

Kara Swisher: I get it. That's why I don't like the small ones that do it or the big ones or they're shitty reporters or they have disingenuous work. I just don't like it no matter what. Anyway, speaking of someone who's disingenuous, tech investor and Trump advisor Mark Andreessen said universities will pay the price for promoting diversity and alleged discrimination against Trump supporters. Andreessen made statements and messages sent to a group chat with White House officials and tech leaders. He's always doing this. He's such a... if you've ever gotten a text from Mark Andreessen, he's so high handed. It's kind of ridiculous. The investor said he views Stanford and MIT as mainly political lobbying operations fighting American innovation. He's got to fucking be kidding me. The messages discussed the counterattack against universities and called for the National Science Foundation to receive the bureaucratic death penalty. They never keep these group chats confidential, and I suspect Andreessen doesn't care. I like them out because you see what an arrogant asshole he is. But, you know, again, as usual, they say things very firmly as if things don't have nuance. Parts of MIT and Stanford and lots of universities, including conservative ones, can have a lot of problems and parts of them are great. And again, the same thing, he can't distinguish between that and has decided to say things like, they will pay the price, they will die a death, all this. There's so much drama with these men.

Scott Galloway: I actually agree a lot with what Mark said.

Kara Swisher: I don't. But go ahead.

Scott Galloway: Well, that's clear. And in our occasional disagreements, white people show up. That and how sexy I am.

Kara Swisher: Can I, before you begin explaining why.

Scott Galloway: Before I rant. No, when you have a point, I think you do it from a place of real thinking about it. I think he does it because he's an unpleasant piece of shit. And so they backfill into an ultra conservative point where they just want to cash subsidies and then not pay taxes is where it all comes from. He gets break after break after break, and then he pretends everybody else hates America.

Kara Swisher: Yes, exactly. Go ahead.

Scott Galloway: So look, 60 years ago, 12 black people at Harvard, Princeton, and Yale combined. That was a problem. We needed race-based affirmative action. The DEI apparatus has become so large and so, in my opinion, unuseful, and it creates more problems now than it solves. 52% of gay men go to college, 34% of straight men. Again, Harvard's freshman class is 60 percent non-white, but 70 percent of those non-whites come from upper income homes. The academic gap between black and white was double what it was from rich and poor 60 years ago. It is now flipped. So what we need is affirmative action based on the primary arbiter of your success moving forward. And that is how wealthy or not wealthy your household is.

Kara Swisher: Correct.

Scott Galloway: Because we still have an economic apartheid because of our checkered history in this nation where black and Latino households only have $20,000 in wealth and whites, $150,000. But quite frankly, there has been too much privilege crammed into the small number of non-whites who are rich. Tyler Perry's kids shouldn't have a better chance of getting into college. Having said that, my industry is guilty of artificially constraining supply such that we can raise prices faster than inflation, which is total bullshit. We should be letting in more kids. And we have let in a preponderance of international kids relative to domestic kids. He was right on that. Not for diversity, that's lying, but because they pay full freight. And we love kids from Honduras or from Italy who pay the full tuition, the full sticker. So we're not inviting them for diversity or for DEI. And it has come at the cost. The cartel, the artificial scarcity, the LVMH-ing, the rejectionist, exclusionary culture trying to be a hedge fund for LVMH as opposed to a public servant has crowded out a lot of unremarkable good American kids who might have remarkable futures. He has a point. But the culprit, he positions it as if it's non-whites who are the problem or advancing the rights of non-whites or women. That's not the problem. The problem is a system that has basically said we're going to reject too many kids. We're going to sit on the GDP of Costa Rica and only have 1,500 kids. Or what do you know, Harvard, and create some Vaseline over the lens that letting in the Taiwanese daughter of a private equity billionaire is somehow diversity. It isn't. International students are outstanding. We love having them. Giving kids with adversity in their background, maybe it's a kid from the inner city, maybe it's a kid who struggled with his sexual identity. Maybe it's a kid going through transition. Fine. But how we solve the problem and how we come together is the following. Every university in this nation that has over a billion dollars in endowment should grow its freshman class faster than population growth or lose its tax-free status. Here's what we need. We need to let in more international students, more trans kids, more gay kids, more white kids from red states. We need more kids. You know where you don't have this argument is community colleges. Because if you just show up and pay the fucking tuition you're in. So we don't have all this agita and all this problem. So instead of arguing about who gets in and who doesn't and creating unnecessary agita in between special interest groups, which is totally unnecessary, we just need to let in more kids. UCLA, 74% admissions rate. When I applied, I was unremarkable. Now it's 9%. We need to just let in more kids such that people like Marc Andreessen can't cloud a very real issue or use that as cloud cover for what is this thinly veiled, ultra conservative viewpoints that, quite frankly, come across as a little bit bigoted and hateful against special interest groups who needed a leg up for a long time.

Kara Swisher: I'm going to insert myself. He's a grievance person. Everything is a grievance. And it all relates to his unhappiness at growing up or whatever happened with his family or whatever. Everything always is a grievance with this guy. And let me tell you, it was from the start when I started covering him. He was always aggrieved by someone or something, and it was always someone else's fault. Always. This has been literally when he was selling Netscape stock, it was Netscape's fault. When he was doing this, it was Microsoft's fault. This guy can never find fault with himself. One. But if he wants to solve the problem, it's pretty easy. He went to an amazing university, the University of Illinois. By the way, public universities will educate two thirds of our kids. And a lot of them, including the University of Illinois, are doing their level best to live up to their mission, and that is to let in not only just amazing, frequently remarkable kids, but just good kids that might end up being frequently remarkable. If he wanted to change things, and I walk the walk here, I do this, he should be giving a shit ton of money to the University of Illinois under the condition of the following, let in more kids. And guess what'll happen, Mark? More Republican white kids from Kentucky will get admissions. Yes, he will not do this. So one of the things when he goes, the tell is mainly political lobbying operations for fighting American innovation. Shut the fuck up. It's the same thing that he does all the time with all his arguments. He's frequently wrong, but never in doubt. And it's exhausting with this guy.

Scott Galloway: All right.

Kara Swisher: I'm just saying, I think you make a good faith argument about the DEI bureaucracy, but the solution of these guys is to kill rather than try to figure out what the best way of getting the most kids in. They do not care about what you care about. They would never give the money to create that vocational thing. They would never go for, they are not solutions based ever. They are tear down based and they really don't like people. I mean, ultimately they don't like people. And by the way, if you saw Marc Andreessen with a poor person, I'd be shocked. He just doesn't like... they don't care. And I think you do. So that's why I allow it from you and not from them, even if you agree.

Scott Galloway: Thanks for your grace.

Kara Swisher: But you have good faith. You have good... there's a difference between disagreement under good faith and disagreement because you're a giant fucking asshole who needs therapy about his parents.

Scott Galloway: I got a little of that.

Kara Swisher: Yeah, I know that. I know that. I did Molly with Calvin Harris. Mark, come with me. I can't believe you didn't wait to do Molly with Kara Swisher.

Scott Galloway: I would never do it with you anyway because we'd hug and then weird things would happen.

Kara Swisher: Okay, Scott, one more quick break. We'll be back for wins and fails.

[BREAK]

Kara Swisher: Okay, Scott, let's hear some wins and fails. I shall go first. You go first. I saw two movies, one with Mr. Louis Swisher on, we saw F1. I thought it was a solidly good movie. Brad Pitt looks fantastic. There's a young guy in it, I'm blanking on his name, who plays the young driver. He's amazing. The whole thing is delightful. And you know exactly how it's going to end. There's not a stitch of...

Scott Galloway: I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume he wins a race.

Kara Swisher: He wins a race. Right. But he does. You know, he tries to let the kid win, but he wins. And of course, then, you know, it's like a Clint Eastwood movie, this thing you've seen 109,000 times. That said, I learned a lot about cars and about tires. I like a lot about tires. There was a one sexy lady technologist in it who I love, who is his love interest. And I wanted to go to F1 after it. I have to say, I was like, I would like to go to F1. This was really interesting. And the whole, there's a little technology in there. Fantastic movie. Superman, also a great movie. I have to say I liked F1 better, but I can see why everybody, Superman is goofy, funny. It is so not woke. It's just goofy. Superman has always been an immigrant. It's always been a tone of this series. He comes from another planet. There's always this thing of him being from Krypton. I thought the guy who played him was delightful. I thought Rachel Brosnahan was fantastic. She was in Marvelous Mrs. Maisel. I thought the whole cast was great. It was so fucking goofy. It was like there were jokes all over the place. And there was one character, this guy who plays Mr. Terrific, another person I've never seen. So funny. Whoever did this has an amazingly good sense of humor. And I think they brought it right where it belongs. I thought, I like Henry Cavill, but too brooding. All the Supermans before Chris Reeve, who I thought was wonderful, too brooding. Now it's really fun. And I see why it's getting, it's what everyone wants. It's a fucking relief to go to that movie. And there's a dog in it too. And then Supergirl shows up and she's like a badass partier. And it's just fun, fun, fun, fun. So that's my win. My fail is Trump attacking Rosie O'Donnell. And I thought Rosie... No, Rosie Epstein. Rosie Epstein. Let's just call her Rosie Epstein. She called her a threat to humanity. She moved to Ireland, by the way. I thought O'Donnell's reply was so fantastic. She did it a bunch of places, but she called him King Joffrey with a tangerine spray. And I love that. And I called her Oleana Tyrell. I thought AOC had the tweet of the week and it reads, "Wow, who would have thought that electing a rapist would have complicated the release of the Epstein files?" Yeah, that was really good, too. I love these women that like slap the fucking shit out of this guy. But what is he doing? Rosie O'Donnell, he's obsessed with her. This has been going on for a long time. He's obsessed with getting people to look away from possible implications of pedophilia.

Scott Galloway: No, it goes back. You remember, speaking of Megyn Kelly when she used to do a good job.

Kara Swisher: That's got nothing to do with this. Rosie Epstein. That's all I have to remember. Rosie Epstein. Anyway, fail Trump, victory Rosie. Okay, your turn.

Scott Galloway: So I'll excuse my win and my fail for a personal indulgence here. As you know, my father passed away last week. I wanted to talk a little bit about him and a couple of the takeaways over the past few days. My father was born out of wedlock in 1930 in Sydney to a woman who was a domestic helper, a nanny for the McVicker family, a rich family in Australia. And one of their daughters was childless, which was a crime back then. And they said, we'll adopt your baby. And they gave her some money and she agreed. And then she had the baby, changed her mind and basically convinced her boyfriend, my grandfather, to meet her at the docks. And they immigrated back to Scotland. My dad was raised in Depression-era Scotland. He says his first memory was during the Clydesbank, I think it was called Raid, where the Luftwaffe bombed some docks and some factories. And he was very, he felt a real sense of patriotism. He was 15 when the war ended, but he said when, I love this image, he said when he was 10, him and his buddies in service to their nation, anyone with an accent in their neighborhood, they would follow around and take notes on them and then report them to the authorities. Like if someone had an Italian accent, they assumed they were a spy and they would follow them around. I love that story. And it was he, at the age of 17, lied about his age, wanted to join the RAF. And he was told he was too tall to be a pilot. So he joined the Navy. And within 48 hours of joining the Navy and saying he could swim well, he was jumping out of a helicopter, practicing pilot rescue in a freezing North Atlantic, trying to put 150 pound dummy back in a basket, sent his money home to his mother so he could save to come to America, got home after serving honorably in the Royal Navy for two years and found out that his mom had spent all the money on whiskey and cigarettes, which kind of scarred my father and has always had a really unhealthy relationship with money, but basically made the best decision I've ever made. And that is he took a huge risk and came to America where he met my mom, his second wife, and I was born to his second wife, my sister, who's been an enormous source of love and reward for me for a long time by his third marriage. He really did live kind of the American dream. One of my favorite stories was when he first got to San Diego, he interviewed to be a salesman at a candle manufacturer. And the HR person said, how long have you been here? And he said, two weeks. And she said, you got to wait here. And she brought in her boss and said, we have to hire this guy. He's only been here two weeks, and he's already learned to speak the language. And my dad, you know, had a pretty nice life. But the reality, Kara, my father wasn't a very high character person. He had four marriages, four divorces, left his last wife when she had late stage Parkinson's, wasn't as kind as he could have been to me and my mom or to my sister. And that created a lot of tumult in my life. And that gets to some of the learnings. The first learning is having gone through this. First off, a lot of people, I've gotten about 600 or 700 text messages and emails from you and other people who have been very supportive and nice. And I just want to say thank you. It does help. But also, just to be grateful, I've been sort of overwhelmed by gratitude, even though maybe it wasn't purposeful. Again, the best thing that happened to me was being born in America. My dad took that risk such that I could be born in America. I have broad shoulders. I'm tall. I have a good voice. And I have made an exceptional living communicating. And all of those things I inherited from my father. And there's no reason not to be grateful for those things. And that helps a lot, just to focus on the good stuff. And then about the advice I would have for anybody that I learned with my relationship, which was tumultuous at times with my father as a following. And that is about 20 years ago, I decided, look, I used to go back and forth. I had very conflicted relationship with my father because he wasn't very good to me as a kid. And so I would get angry at him as an adult and think, I don't want to be a very good son. And then I recognize, and it's been an enormous unlock in my life. Just imagine the son you want to be, or the partner you want to be, the girlfriend you want to be, the employer you want to be, the boss you want to be, and hold yourself to that standard and stop keeping score. And it was such an enormous unlock for me. I've had such a wonderful relationship with him for the last 20 years, just trying to be a generous and loving son and not think about whether or not I was in the debit or the surplus category. And I've approached, that's just been such an enormous unlock for me in the rest of my life, thinking about what kind of partner do I want to be, what kind of friend do I want to be, and living to that standard, not keeping score. And that started with my decision to try and be a loving, generous son, regardless of what had happened in our relationship previously. Anyways, I'm writing this book on masculinity, and I digress to these three pillars of masculinity, of being a protector, provider, and a procreator. My dad did protect his country. He took huge sacrifices and put himself in personal risk to try and do the right thing and served his country. He did provide for two families, and obviously he was a procreator. He had two kids and four grandkids, but it's also a cautionary tale. He never was really able to speak, to think about others in a very generous way. So even when my sister and I were thinking about whether or not we should have a service, we decided not to because the reality is the sad truth is nobody would show up. He didn't have any friends. He didn't really have anybody other than his daughter and his son who care about him. And so it really is a cautionary tale. But my dad did serve his country. He did his best. He checked the primary box, I think, around being a father, and that is he was much better to me and his daughter than his father was to him. Anyways, 95, lived a very rich life, and his son and his daughter will miss him terribly.

Kara Swisher: No, Scott, I'm so sorry. Almost made it through.

Scott Galloway: It's okay.

Kara Swisher: Scott, this is your best quality. Don't think it's not. Let me just say, I know your sister just a little bit. She's wonderful. But the best thing he did was give us you.

Scott Galloway: That's nice. Thank you.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, now you got me crying.

Scott Galloway: There you go. We'll have to go through this. I'm lucky at some point.

Kara Swisher: There you go. We'll probably have a party.

Scott Galloway: Four wives, four divorces when you were in 70s California with a strong Glaswegian accent. You could not only think with your dick, you could listen to it. God, he had a nice time.

Kara Swisher: Yeah. Yeah, and you and then his son last week was in Ibiza having Molly. Win, win. Win, win.

Scott Galloway: Win, win.

Kara Swisher: No, I'm serious, Scott. You are a journey, and I really appreciate that about you. And I think you took a lot of lessons from your dad. You had a tough time. And it sounds like your mom was the real strong person for you. But it's still, you're from where you're from, right?

Kara Swisher: Yeah, that's right. And that's what makes you the person you are. Anyway, I really appreciate that. And whatever you need, all of us are here for you, including all your listeners and me too.

Kara Swisher: Anyway, we want to hear from you. Send us your questions about business, tech, or whatever's on your mind. Go to nymag.com slash pivot to submit a question for the show or call 855-51-PIVOT.

Kara Swisher: Scott, I can't believe you made me cry. Elsewhere in the Kara and Scott universe this week on *On with Kara Swisher*, I spoke with astrophysicist and author of the new book *More Everything Forever*, Adam Becker. Let's listen to a clip.

Adam Becker: [Clip] I think that a lot of what's happened in this country over the last, at this point, 10 years has shown like the kinds of risks that we as a society take by having billionaires, by allowing that kind of concentration of wealth. It erodes the democratic fabric of the country. And at this point, our democracy is in mortal danger and may already be lost.

Kara Swisher: That was a particular—it's a great book. It's about the idea of "more everything forever," which is a lot of sort of these tech people think when, in fact, it's more everything forever for themselves. Anyway, it's a great book. He's really interesting. He sort of knocks away all the myths around living on Mars, et cetera, all their dreams that are not good for most of humanity, but it's good for them.

Kara Swisher: OK, that's the show. Thanks for listening to *Pivot*. And be sure to like and subscribe to our YouTube channel. We'll be back on Friday. Scott, read us out.

Scott Galloway: Today's show was produced by Lara Neyman, Zoe Marcus, Taylor Griffin and Kevin Oliver. Ernie and Todd, engineer of this episode. Thanks also to Drew Burrows, Mio Sabero, and Dan Chalon. Nishak Kruaz, Vox Media's executive producer of podcasts. Make sure to follow *Pivot* on your favorite podcast platform.

Scott Galloway: Thanks for listening to *Pivot* from New York Magazine and Vox Media. You can subscribe to the magazine at nymag.com. We'll be back later this week for another breakdown of all things tech and business. Thanks to everyone for all your warm wishes. It helps a great deal.

[Advertisement: Adobe Acrobat Studio] [Advertisement: Saks Fifth Avenue] [Advertisement: Smartsheet]